EIR Summary - St. Michael's Abbey
EIR Summary - St. Michael's Abbey
EIR Summary - St. Michael's Abbey
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>St</strong>. Michael’s <strong>Abbey</strong> Environmental <strong>Summary</strong><br />
ENVIRONMENTAL<br />
IMPACT<br />
Based on monastery<br />
church, monastery school,<br />
and associated facilities<br />
POPULATION AND<br />
HOUSING<br />
Assesses the inducement of<br />
population growth<br />
PUBLIC SERVICES<br />
Assesses potential impacts to<br />
potable water, storm water,<br />
sewer, electricity, and<br />
telephone/cable<br />
RECREATION<br />
Assesses the availability of<br />
and anticipated demand for<br />
recreational facilities<br />
TRANSPORTATION<br />
AND TRAFFIC<br />
Assesses increased vehicular<br />
traffic when compared to<br />
existing traffic flows,<br />
increased pedestrian, cycling<br />
and equestrian traffic and<br />
parking<br />
UTILITIES<br />
Assesses the origination<br />
of the project’s water<br />
supply, examines<br />
stormwater, sewer,<br />
electricity and<br />
telephone/cable services<br />
ST. MICHAEL’S ABBEY<br />
LEVEL OF<br />
SIGNIFICANCE<br />
DETERMINATION<br />
LESS THAN<br />
SIGNIFICANT<br />
LESS THAN<br />
SIGNIFICANT<br />
WITH MITIGATION<br />
LESS THAN<br />
SIGNIFICANT<br />
LESS THAN<br />
SIGNIFICANT<br />
WITH MITIGATION<br />
LESS THAN<br />
SIGNIFICANT<br />
KEY FINDINGS<br />
With the unincorporated population of the County<br />
projected to increase by 68,095 persons between 2010<br />
and 2035, the 97 permanent residents of the project<br />
would represent approximately 0.14% of the total<br />
anticipated growth of the County. (Although the<br />
current on-site population of the Fathers would likely<br />
be transferred to the Project site, the <strong>EIR</strong> does not<br />
account for the cessation of activities at the existing<br />
<strong>Abbey</strong> site)<br />
NO PROJECT /<br />
NO DEVELOPMENT (1A)<br />
vs.<br />
ST. MICHAEL’S ABBEY<br />
Alternatives Comparison<br />
*EXISTING<br />
ENTITLEMENT (1B)<br />
vs.<br />
ST. MICHAEL’S ABBEY<br />
DIVIDED USES ON<br />
DIFFERENT SITES (2)<br />
vs.<br />
ST. MICHAEL’S ABBEY<br />
REDUCED<br />
DEVELOPMENT (3)<br />
vs.<br />
ST. MICHAEL’S ABBEY<br />
- - = = =<br />
An on-site septic system would be provided to serve<br />
the project. The project will meet county requirements<br />
that mandate on-site retention of storm water runoff - - +/- - -<br />
over existing conditions.<br />
All demands for local park recreational facilities would<br />
be fully satisfied by the Project’s proposed on-site<br />
amenities.<br />
The Project Applicant will offer an open space and trail<br />
easement for future open space and/or trail<br />
implementation to the County or another entity<br />
approved by the County. This 16 ft. wide easement<br />
would be located along the south side of Silverado<br />
Canyon Road and total approximately 0.39-acre of onsite<br />
easement dedication and 0.71 acre of off-site<br />
easement dedication.<br />
The project would add 2-13 additional vehicles to<br />
Santiago Canyon Road during peak hours. Vehicle<br />
trips to and from the site on Sundays are expected to be<br />
higher than weekday volumes yet would occur during<br />
non-peak hours. A traffic signal would be<br />
implemented to reduce impacts at Santiago Canyon<br />
Road/Live Oak Canyon Road intersection.<br />
- - + +<br />
=<br />
Removes south side of<br />
Silverado Canyon Road from<br />
project area (and with it, the 16<br />
ft. easement)<br />
- - + ++/- =<br />
An on-site septic system would be provided to serve<br />
the project. The County requires all new development<br />
projects to retain storm water runoff on-site above - - - - - - -<br />
existing conditions.<br />
The <strong>St</strong>. Michael’s <strong>Abbey</strong> Draft <strong>EIR</strong> will be available for public review and comment for a period of 45 days beginning on June 4, 2012.<br />
*Applies to just one of the two parcels within the proposed project<br />
4