âThe question is not whether we can afford to invest in every child; it ...
âThe question is not whether we can afford to invest in every child; it ...
âThe question is not whether we can afford to invest in every child; it ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Information Calculation Cost Benef<strong>it</strong><br />
86% of 394 youth served<br />
rema<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> the home (339)<br />
Average cost of placement<br />
$57,788<br />
339 youth<br />
X<br />
$57,788 =<br />
$19,590,132<br />
IHBT Grant FY 08 & 09 (394 youth) 394 x $7,500 =<br />
$2,955,000<br />
Typical Case Rate for IHBT =<br />
$7,500<br />
55 youth placed 55 x $57,788=<br />
$3,178,340<br />
Average cost of placement<br />
$57,788<br />
394 youth served <strong>in</strong> IHBT Grant<br />
FY 08 and 09<br />
Cost saved m<strong>in</strong>us cost of IHBT<br />
and cost of youth placed<br />
$13,456,792 divided by <strong>to</strong>tal<br />
youth served (394)<br />
Total Benef<strong>it</strong> (19,590,132 –<br />
3,178,340)/Total Service Cost<br />
(2,955,000)<br />
$2,955,00<br />
Total cost of<br />
IHBT<br />
$3,178,340<br />
Total cost of<br />
placement<br />
For <strong>every</strong> ($1)<br />
dollar spent <strong>in</strong><br />
IHBT<br />
$19,590,132<br />
Placement costs avoided<br />
Total Benef<strong>it</strong><br />
$13,456,792 (for all youth<br />
served)<br />
$34,154 (Cost sav<strong>in</strong>gs per<br />
youth)<br />
$5.55 <strong>is</strong> returned <strong>in</strong> placement<br />
costs avoided<br />
3/16/2012 53<br />
• Over $16.4 million <strong>in</strong> placement costs saved at the<br />
cost of approximately $3 million (IHBT for 394 youth)<br />
• Total Cost Benef<strong>it</strong> over $13.4 million saved for 394<br />
youth served (IHBT grant 2009)<br />
• The <strong>to</strong>tal cost sav<strong>in</strong>gs per youth <strong>is</strong> $34,154<br />
• For <strong>every</strong> dollar spent <strong>in</strong> IHBT/MST there was a<br />
return of $5.55 or 555% <strong>in</strong> placement costs avoided.<br />
3/16/2012 54<br />
• Technical Ass<strong>is</strong>tance <strong>is</strong> needed <strong>to</strong> maximize effectiveness of<br />
IHBT<br />
• Agency/program level fund<strong>in</strong>g requires more than Medicaid<br />
• A uniform data collection system <strong>is</strong> necessary <strong>in</strong> order <strong>to</strong><br />
provide timely cl<strong>in</strong>ical feedback and track qual<strong>it</strong>y improvement<br />
• Stakeholders/funders <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly rely<strong>in</strong>g on data <strong>to</strong> make<br />
f<strong>in</strong>ancial dec<strong>is</strong>ions<br />
• Multiple partners and multiple systems are needed <strong>to</strong> support<br />
implementation<br />
• High level tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g and ongo<strong>in</strong>g coach<strong>in</strong>g and moni<strong>to</strong>r<strong>in</strong>g of<br />
fidel<strong>it</strong>y<br />
So, where <strong>is</strong><br />
Ohio on IHBT?<br />
ODMH comm<strong>it</strong>ted <strong>to</strong> add<strong>in</strong>g IHBT <strong>to</strong><br />
Medicaid service menu by FY ‘13<br />
IHBT workgroup completed <strong>it</strong>s review<br />
ODMH conduct<strong>in</strong>g rate sett<strong>in</strong>g exerc<strong>is</strong>e<br />
Next Steps: Prepare SPA and subm<strong>it</strong> <strong>to</strong><br />
CMS<br />
Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g and roll out<br />
Current IHBT status<br />
• Approximately 20+ certified IHBT s<strong>it</strong>es<br />
• 16 MST teams for 10 counties<br />
• Other non-certified <strong>in</strong> home programs<br />
3/16/2012 55<br />
56<br />
14