Attenuated Plaque - summitMD.com

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Comparison between Ruptured thrombosis vs. Erosive thrombosis No Plaque Rupture (n=23) Plaque Rupture (n=17) p-value TCFA 73.9% 64.7% 0.53 MLA site Lumen Area (mm 2 ) 3.5±1.4 3.1±0.6 0.34 Vessel Area (mm 2 ) 16.0±4.4 20.3±5.5 0.09 Plaque Burden (%) 78.2±5.5 83.6±4.7 0.002 Necrotic Core (%) 23.1±11.9 19.1±10.1 0.26 Maximum NC site Lumen Area (mm 2 ) 4.8±2.0 5.4±1.7 0.40 Vessel Area (mm 2 ) 16.0±4.3 18.6±5.3 0.11 Plaque Burden (%) 70.3±8.0 70.3±7.9 0.97 Necrotic Core (%) 34.3±12.9 28.7±9.1 0.13 Sanidas E @ CRF
Small rupture NC fissure thrombus Big rupture thrombus Sanidas E @ CRF
Page 1 and 2: Assessment of Vulnerable Plaque by
Page 3 and 4: Plaque Rupture & Echolucent Plaque
Page 5 and 6: Calcium Nodule Data obtained in the
Page 7 and 8: Distribution of Calcium Nodule Simi
Page 9 and 10: Histological Atherosclerosis Classi
Page 11 and 12: Pathological Intimal thickneing & F
Page 13 and 14: “Confluent”
Page 15 and 16: Thick cap fibroatheroma Thin cap fi
Page 17 and 18: Incidence of NC at the bottom/shoul
Page 19 and 20: PROSPECT 27731-003: Index 3/15/05 L
Page 21 and 22: PROSPECT 82910-012: 012: Index 2/13
Page 23 and 24: True or Artificial Necrotic Core?
Page 25 and 26: Necrotic core and Calcium are toget
Page 27 and 28: Echolucent Plaque and VH
Page 29 and 30: Attenuated Plaque and VH Attenuated
Page 31 and 32: Attenuated Plaque Data obtained in
Page 33: Plaque Morphology of AMI/SCD w/Thro
Page 37: Vulnerable Plaque? Pathological Int

Attenuated Plaque - summitMD.com

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?