Disciplinary Counsel v. Anthony Lewis-Jerdine, Case No. UPL 09-01
Disciplinary Counsel v. Anthony Lewis-Jerdine, Case No. UPL 09-01
Disciplinary Counsel v. Anthony Lewis-Jerdine, Case No. UPL 09-01
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
(e) Respondent's conduct was the result of a motive other than<br />
dishonesty or personal benefit.<br />
Under these circumstances, relator believes that an order that respondent<br />
cease and desist from engaging in similar circumstances is an appropriate remedy in<br />
this matter.<br />
Relator does not believe that a civil penalty is warranted.<br />
Respectfully submitted,<br />
. oughlan (0026424)<br />
ounsel<br />
~_¥_-<br />
Assistant <strong>Disciplinary</strong> <strong>Counsel</strong><br />
Office of <strong>Disciplinary</strong> <strong>Counsel</strong> of<br />
The Supreme Court of Ohio<br />
250 Civic Center Drive, Suite 325<br />
Columbus, Ohio 43215-7411<br />
Telephone (614) 461-0256<br />
Facsimile (614) 461-7205<br />
4
Change language