06.09.2014 Views

Nesting of green turtles (Chelonia mydas) at ... - Seaturtle.org

Nesting of green turtles (Chelonia mydas) at ... - Seaturtle.org

Nesting of green turtles (Chelonia mydas) at ... - Seaturtle.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

154 B.J. Godley et al. / Biological Conserv<strong>at</strong>ion 97 (2001) 151±158<br />

nesting success was 99.5 (S.D.= 122; range= 5±444)<br />

while the mean number <strong>of</strong> surveys to collect these d<strong>at</strong>a<br />

was 14.4 (S.D.= 7.5; range= 10±37). The mean values<br />

for nesting success for each beach varied 4-fold, from<br />

0.13 on beach 10 to 0.52 on beach 12 (Table 1), with a<br />

mean <strong>of</strong> 0.33 for all beaches (S.D.= 0.08; n=25 beaches).<br />

The overall nesting success for Ascension Island<br />

calcul<strong>at</strong>ed as total nests divided by total activities was<br />

0.39. When nesting success for the three main beaches<br />

(1, 12, 27) were plotted against time, no trends were<br />

detected.<br />

By multiplying the nest success (p) for each beach by<br />

the respective number <strong>of</strong> activities (a), the number <strong>of</strong><br />

nests on Ascension Island over the season was estim<strong>at</strong>ed<br />

<strong>at</strong> 13,881. The f<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> a nesting activity is e€ectively a<br />

binomial problem, with outcomes <strong>of</strong> either a ``nest'' or<br />

``no nest''. We used a standard equ<strong>at</strong>ion to calcul<strong>at</strong>e the<br />

variance in the estim<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> the mean nesting success<br />

value for each beach, i.e. variance=pq/a where q=1 p<br />

(Bailey, 1981), and then from this variance 95% con-<br />

®dence limits (95% CL) were determined. Since the<br />

variance <strong>of</strong> the sum <strong>of</strong> a series <strong>of</strong> estim<strong>at</strong>es is simply the<br />

sum <strong>of</strong> their individual variances, the 95% con®dence<br />

limits on the estim<strong>at</strong>e for the total number <strong>of</strong> nests was<br />

readily determined as 13,092±14,660.<br />

3.2. Magnitude <strong>of</strong> nesting<br />

A total <strong>of</strong> 36,036 marine turtle nesting activities was<br />

estim<strong>at</strong>ed over the entire season, with the number <strong>of</strong><br />

activities per beach ranging from 47 to 9651. Density <strong>of</strong><br />

nesting activities varied widely from 534 to 10,001<br />

activities/km, as did nest density which ranged from 213<br />

to 5200 nests/km. Overall density <strong>of</strong> activities (total<br />

activities/total beach surveyed) was 6204 activities/km<br />

and total nest density (total nests/total beach surveyed)<br />

was 2390 nests/km.<br />

3.3. Sp<strong>at</strong>ial distribution <strong>of</strong> nesting e€ort<br />

Included for comparison are d<strong>at</strong>a from the surveys by<br />

Mortimer and Carr (1987; Table 2), and Mortimer<br />

(1992; from a partial survey carried out in April 1992).<br />

There were many more activities in the 1998/1999 season<br />

than in the two seasons recorded by Mortimer and<br />

Carr (1987), with the total being gre<strong>at</strong>er by an order <strong>of</strong><br />

two and three than in 1976/1977 and 1977/1978 seasons,<br />

respectively. To compare the sp<strong>at</strong>ial vari<strong>at</strong>ion in nesting<br />

e€ort <strong>of</strong> the 1998/1999 season with th<strong>at</strong> <strong>of</strong> previous<br />

surveys (Mortimer and Carr, 1987; Mortimer, 1992),<br />

d<strong>at</strong>a from individual beaches were combined into the<br />

clusters de®ned by Mortimer and Carr (1987; Table 1).<br />

In general, among beach sp<strong>at</strong>ial vari<strong>at</strong>ion was similar in<br />

all seasons. The only marked change since the studies in<br />

1976±1978 appears to be the proportion <strong>of</strong> nesting<br />

occurring on beach number 12.<br />

3.4. Temporal distribution <strong>of</strong> nesting e€ort<br />

The temporal distribution <strong>of</strong> nesting activities is<br />

shown in Fig. 2. Nests were ®rst recorded on 2 December<br />

1998 and continued until the last clutch was laid on<br />

31 August, 1999. The peak <strong>of</strong> nesting was in March with<br />

90% <strong>of</strong> nesting occurring between 13 January and 7<br />

May 1999 and 95% <strong>of</strong> nesting recorded between 4 January<br />

and 18 May 1999.<br />

We used stepwise multiple regression to investig<strong>at</strong>e<br />

the rel<strong>at</strong>ionship between the available we<strong>at</strong>her parameters<br />

(maximum temper<strong>at</strong>ure ( C), minimum temper<strong>at</strong>ure<br />

( C), rainfall (mm)) recorded on each day (2<br />

December 1998 to 31 August 1999) and the estim<strong>at</strong>ed<br />

number <strong>of</strong> nests for th<strong>at</strong> day on the whole island. The<br />

most signi®cant variable was maximum daily temper<strong>at</strong>ure<br />

(r 2 =0.58) with a model including temper<strong>at</strong>ure and<br />

rainfall explaining slightly more <strong>of</strong> the variance<br />

Table 2<br />

Estim<strong>at</strong>ed number <strong>of</strong> activities recorded in the 1998/1999 season in comparison with d<strong>at</strong>a collected by Mortimer and Carr (1987) in the 1976/1977<br />

and 1977/1978 seasons. In addition, d<strong>at</strong>a from the partial survey carried out by Mortimer (1992) are included<br />

Beaches 1976/1977 1977/1978 1991/1992 1998/1999 c<br />

1 2793 (15.4) a 2195 (18.2) (13.1) 4500 (12.5)<br />

2±5 1821 (10.0) 1569 (13.0) (11.3) 5434 (15.1)<br />

6±11 2453 (13.5) 1428 (11.8) (17.0) 4599 (12.8)<br />

12 3118 (17.1) 1760 (14.6) (28.1) 9651 (26.8)<br />

14±20 1341 (7.4) 783 (6.5) (1.4) 2819 (7.8)<br />

21±26 976 (5.4) 822 (6.8) (5.5) 1820 (5.1)<br />

27 2703 (14.9) 1469 (12.1) (12.5) 3216 (8.9)<br />

28 804 (4.4) 420 (3.5) (1.8) 1172 (3.2)<br />

29 1743 (9.6) 1191 (9.8) (6.9) 1986 (5.5)<br />

30±32 440 (2.4) 456 (3.8) (2.6) 839 (2.3)<br />

Total 18,192 12,093 na b 36,036<br />

a Numbers in parentheses denote the percentage <strong>of</strong> the total for the season.<br />

b na, Not applicable.<br />

c It should be noted th<strong>at</strong> in 1998/1999, d<strong>at</strong>a were not included from beaches 13, 18, 19, 20 and 32 (see Section 2).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!