25.09.2014 Views

Jul - The R-390A Frequently Asked Questions Page

Jul - The R-390A Frequently Asked Questions Page

Jul - The R-390A Frequently Asked Questions Page

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

$4000 (maybe $5000, I don't remember). Of course, it was probably better than new in many ways.<br />

> My 390 is cleaning up nice Roy. I can't wait to have it finished so it can kick some <strong>390A</strong> butt. :-) Fair<br />

Radio's knobs are nice, but don't look original because they have no casting marks. <strong>The</strong>y are too perfect.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re are some cast knobs that don't have significant casting marks. I don't know which contract made<br />

them. Paul<br />

From cbscott@ingr.com Thu <strong>Jul</strong> 11 15:15:07 2002<br />

Subject: [R-390] OT<br />

Can someone give me some advice concerning some optoisolators? I built an interface to go between<br />

the computer to my Knwd TS440. It uses a MAX232 level converter and four NEC PS2501<br />

optoisolators. <strong>The</strong> project did not work and, after finding a bad solder joint, the MAX232 seems to be<br />

doing what it should, but all the optoisolators seem to be blown.<br />

I was careful handling them (assuming they are somewhat static sensitive), but all of them appear to be<br />

bad. <strong>The</strong> diode part checks okay with the Fluke DMM's diode-checker mode, but the EC junction<br />

doesn't seem to be working. I've ordered replacement isolators, but before I start playing with them I<br />

have a couple of questions.<br />

Is it possible (or safe) to check the EC junction using the Fluke's diode-checking function? Unless the<br />

LED is forward biased, should I see anything across this junction with the Fluke?<br />

How "rugged" are these devices? Given that I strap a ground wire around my wrist and have my feet on<br />

the concrete floor, should this be sufficient to keep from "blowing" them? Are they as rugged as, say, a<br />

2N2222? Thanks, Barry(III) - N4BUQ SAND<br />

From R<strong>390A</strong>@r390a.com Thu <strong>Jul</strong> 11 15:57:21 2002<br />

Subject: [R-390] Filter Caps<br />

Several had written me over the past few months asking if I would rebuild their filter caps. I had<br />

responded that I was out of the Mallory 350V elements and had to decline.<br />

I found a small cache of caps at a supplier out west. I now have enough in hand to rebuild 12 sets of<br />

caps. I also have enough parts on had to build 4 solid state 3TF7 replacement modules. If you are<br />

interested, let me know. Chuck Rippel, WA4HHG<br />

From drewmaster813@hotmail.com Thu <strong>Jul</strong> 11 17:47:04 2002<br />

Subject: [R-390] Re: Miltronix EAC<br />

Barry (Hauser),<br />

<strong>The</strong> single "tube" you refer to on the modified power supply unit is probably a thermal time delay relay.<br />

This would allow sufficient time for tube warm-up then would apply B+. An example of an R-<strong>390A</strong><br />

power supply modified this way can be found at: members.aol.com/ac5zt/r390a.html<br />

One opinion holds that application of B+ before cathode warm-up causes deterioration ("stripping") of<br />

32

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!