ESF Guidance Manual 4 Annex 11: Article 13: ESF Verification ...
ESF Guidance Manual 4 Annex 11: Article 13: ESF Verification ...
ESF Guidance Manual 4 Annex 11: Article 13: ESF Verification ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
will follow the procedures set out in the Managing Authority <strong>Manual</strong>.<br />
Extrapolation of irregularities – CFOs<br />
31a. Where A<strong>13</strong> On the Spot verification visits establish that there are<br />
irregularities within one or more subset populations being tested (such as<br />
participants with job outcomes) and they have similar characteristics (such as<br />
missing participant records), the sample will be extended. This will establish<br />
whether or not the irregularity is likely to be repeated within the rest of the<br />
subset population.<br />
If the extended sample establishes that there are similar irregularities, the<br />
principle of extrapolation will apply. The extrapolation will cover the remaining<br />
unchecked population in order to calculate the full extent of the irregularity<br />
within that subset population. A formula will be applied to extrapolate the error<br />
across the whole population under that payment type, provision and claim<br />
period. This process is also in line with A16 procedures.<br />
CFOs should also note that the impact may extend beyond the period tested<br />
to the remaining unchecked subset population, other claims or operations. If<br />
this is the case the CFO will be asked to conduct further work on the<br />
remaining population to identify any additional irregular expenditure. CFOs<br />
should inform the MA of the methodology used, subsets and periods covered<br />
by their audit activities to demonstrate the basis for any additional irregular<br />
expenditure. This work may be reviewed by the Managing and Audit<br />
Authorities.<br />
Coverage<br />
32. All CFOs and all their claims will be subject to <strong>Article</strong> <strong>13</strong> on the spot<br />
verification activity. The selection of the expenditure and providers will be<br />
undertaken on a sample basis. The Managing Authority is required to set a<br />
sample size that achieves ‘reasonable assurance as to the legality and<br />
regularity of the underlying transactions’ (extract from EC guidance).<br />
Following consultation with the Audit Authority, the sample <strong>Article</strong> <strong>13</strong> on the<br />
spot verification at CFO level aims to cover a minimum of 20 per cent of <strong>ESF</strong><br />
and match expenditure claimed, but excluding administrative costs, during the<br />
lifetime of the programme. A key principle is that all providers/sub-contractors<br />
may be the subject of an on the spot check during the lifetime of the<br />
programme. The level and frequency of verification activity is summarised in<br />
the tables below.<br />
CFO verifications<br />
<strong>Verification</strong> activity<br />
Administrative<br />
verifications<br />
On-the-spot<br />
verifications of<br />
Undertaken<br />
by<br />
GLA<br />
Managing<br />
authority<br />
Managing<br />
authority<br />
Coverage<br />
All interim and final claims will be<br />
checked<br />
All CFO interim claims will be subject<br />
to selection through the sampling<br />
<strong>Manual</strong> 4 <strong>Annex</strong> <strong>11</strong> - <strong>Article</strong> <strong>13</strong> Strategy | September 2012 Page 8 of 33