Demographic Change and the Expansion of Urban Areas in MD ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Figure 4.10 High technology establishments by zip code, 2000……………………………………..60 Figure 4.11 Employment centers in Central Maryland……………………………………………….61 Figure 5.1 Percent of land area in farms by county, 1978 and 2002………………………………...65 Figure 5.2 Farm acres by county, 1978 to 2002……………………………………………………..66 Figure 5.3 Number of farms by county, 1987 to 2002………………………………………………68 Figure 5.4 Change in the number of farms by zip code, 1987 to 2002……………………………...70 Figure 5.5 Farm size in Montgomery County, 1982 to 2002………………………………………..72 Figure 5.6 Farm size in Worcester County, 1982 to 2002…………………………………………..74 Figure 5.7 Real agricultural property values by county, 1986 to 2005 (in 2005 dollars)…………...75 Figure 6.2 1986 classification for Montgomery and Frederick counties……………………………78 Figure 6.3 1995 classification for Frederick and Montgomery counties……………………………79 Figure 6.4 2001 classification for Frederick and Montgomery counties……………………………80 Figure 6.5 Progression of urbanization for Frederick and Montgomery counties, 1986, 1995, and 2001………………………………………………………………………………………81 Figure 6.6 Montgomery County classification totals………………………………………………..82 Figure 6.7 Frederick County classification totals……………………………………………………85 v
Figure 6.8 Change in developed LPI 1986 - 2001…………………………………………………..90 Figure 6.9 Change in forest LPI 1986- 2001 ………………………………………………………..91 Figure 6.10 Change in agriculture/open LPI 1986 - 2001…………………………………………….92 Figure 7.1 Distance from non-agricultural parcel………………………………………………….100 Figure 7.2 Distance from the interstate highway…………………………………………………..100 Figure 7.3 Quality of land in agricultural production……………………………………………...101 Figure 7.4 Map of probability land will change from agricultural to urban use…………………...103 Figure A.1 Classification Workflow………………………………………………………………..112 vi
Page 1 and 2: DEMOGRAPHIC CHANGE AND THE EXPANSIO
Page 3 and 4: LIST OF TABLES Table 1.1 Metropolit
Page 5: LIST OF FIGURES Figure E.1 Map of p
Page 9 and 10: more than 165,000 people since the
Page 11 and 12: in such small urban centers of the
Page 13 and 14: Metropolitan counties in both the W
Page 15 and 16: and forested land in both Frederick
Page 17 and 18: Using the results of our statistica
Page 19 and 20: CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION Maryland h
Page 21 and 22: cover for years 1986, 1995 and 2001
Page 23 and 24: Anne Arundel County and Howard Coun
Page 25 and 26: In terms of percentage increase in
Page 27 and 28: projections suggest this is likely
Page 29 and 30: Figure 2.1 illustrates the populati
Page 31 and 32: American in 1990 to almost 35 perce
Page 33 and 34: Another aspect of diversification i
Page 35 and 36: In- and out-migration of population
Page 37 and 38: were 5,892, a similar statistic to
Page 39 and 40: An interesting finding in our analy
Page 41 and 42: domestic migration patterns, there
Page 43 and 44: Much of the housing development occ
Page 45 and 46: The housing development in Worceste
Page 47 and 48: Our analysis of land cover change w
Page 49 and 50: 1969. Of these workers, more than 1
Page 51 and 52: ate was followed closely behind by
Page 53 and 54: Frederick and Prince George’s cou
Page 55 and 56: Washington Queen Annes Howard Harfo
Page 57 and 58:
The retail trade sector has grown i
Page 59 and 60:
employment growth was the service s
Page 61 and 62:
than 30,000 new jobs from 1969 to 2
Page 63 and 64:
employment barely grew and farm emp
Page 65 and 66:
employment, ten percent of Wicomico
Page 67 and 68:
The presence of important federal r
Page 69 and 70:
Summary of analysis of employment T
Page 71 and 72:
CHAPTER FIVE MARYLAND’S AGRICULTU
Page 73 and 74:
the county was in farming compared
Page 75 and 76:
losses as the land in farming decli
Page 77 and 78:
Figure 5.4 Change in the number of
Page 79 and 80:
farm size at 91 acres in 2002, a de
Page 81 and 82:
the percent of farms over 1,000 acr
Page 83 and 84:
CHAPTER SIX LAND COVER CHANGE IN TR
Page 85 and 86:
Figure 6.2 1986 classification for
Page 87 and 88:
Figure 6.4 2001 classification for
Page 89 and 90:
Montgomery County Land Use Change (
Page 91 and 92:
Frederick County Frederick County,
Page 93 and 94:
Frederick County gained 7,103 acres
Page 95 and 96:
Figure 6.8 is a map of the LPI chan
Page 97 and 98:
Figure 6.8 Change in developed LPI
Page 99 and 100:
Figure 6.10 Change in agriculture/o
Page 101 and 102:
Third, farming is important to the
Page 103 and 104:
concentrations in health care and b
Page 105 and 106:
likely the parcel is to stay in agr
Page 107 and 108:
Probability Land Stays Agricultural
Page 109 and 110:
parcel is 50 meters (.03 miles) or
Page 111 and 112:
In this map, areas that are already
Page 113 and 114:
CHAPTER EIGHT CONCLUSION Rapid popu
Page 115 and 116:
The decline in the farming related
Page 117 and 118:
The value of this model for policy
Page 119 and 120:
Appendix 1 Figure A.1 shows a workf
Page 121:
transformation. The resulting class
show all

Demographic Change and the Expansion of Urban Areas in MD ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?