The Application of Fundamental Analysis and Technical ... - mibes

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Appendix Table 1: Industrial Firm’s Performance Correlated with Index, Sector, Size, Establishment Date and Import Date. Performance Perf Sector SEC Index IND Size SIZ EstDate EST ImpDate IMP Performance Pearson Perf Correlation 1 -,092 ,271(*) -,054 -,183 -,018 Sig. (2-tailed) ,466 ,029 ,669 ,149 ,885 N 65 65 65 65 64 65 * Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed). Table 2: Regression Summary Model R R Square Adjusted R Square Std. Error of the Estimate 1 ,384(a) ,148 ,074 6,865 a Predictors: (Constant), ImpDate IMP, Index IND, Sector SEC, EstDate EST, Size SIZ Table 3: Regression ANOVA Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. 1 Regression 7,415 4 1,854 ,409 ,796(a) Residual 18,141 4 4,535 Total 25,556 8 a Predictors: (Constant), IntDate INT, Index IND, EstDate EST, Size SIZ b Dependent Variable: Performance PERF Table 4: Regression Coefficients Model Unstandardized Coefficients Standardized Coefficients t Sig. B Std. Error Beta 1 (Constant) -68,288 77,954 -,876 ,430 Index IND 1,804 3,152 ,505 ,572 ,598 Size SIZ 2,368 2,173 1,147 1,089 ,337 EstDate EST ,027 ,039 ,469 ,680 ,534 IntDate INT ,016 ,031 ,327 ,532 ,623 a Dependent Variable: Performance PERF Table 5: Banks’ Performance Correlated with Index, Size, Establishment Date and Import Date Performance PERF Index IND Size SIZ EstDate EST IntDate INT Performance Pearson PERF Correlation 1 -,047 ,162 ,139 ,193 Sig. (2-tailed) ,905 ,678 ,721 ,618 N 9 9 9 9 9 ** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). * Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).
Table 6: Stocks’ Performance Correlated with Sector, Index, Size, Establishment Date and Import Date Sector SEC Index IND Size SIZ EstDate EST ImpDate IMP Performnace1 Pearson Correlation ,221 ,050 -,151 -,221 -,200 Sig. (2-tailed) ,059 ,670 ,198 ,059 ,088 N 74 74 74 74 74 Performance2 Pearson Correlation -,138 ,164 -,255(*) ,054 ,039 Sig. (2-tailed) ,240 ,164 ,029 ,645 ,744 N 74 74 74 74 74 Performnace3 Pearson Correlation -,076 ,035 ,025 -,090 -,073 Sig. (2-tailed) ,518 ,765 ,832 ,446 ,538 N 74 74 74 74 74 Performance4 Pearson Correlation ,129 ,094 ,014 ,008 ,040 Sig. (2-tailed) ,273 ,426 ,904 ,944 ,737 N 74 74 74 74 74 Performance5 Pearson Correlation ,069 ,102 -,029 ,213 ,179 Sig. (2-tailed) ,559 ,386 ,806 ,068 ,128 N 74 74 74 74 74 * Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed). ** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). Table 7: Check of Independency using the Chi- Square Perform1 Perform2 Perform3 Perform4 Perform5 Index IND Chi- Square(a,b) 56,541 59,459 37,243 36,270 169,243 27,351 df 5 5 5 5 5 4 Asymp. Sig. ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 a 0 cells (,0%) have expected frequencies less than 5. The minimum expected cell frequency is 12,3. b 0 cells (,0%) have expected frequencies less than 5. The minimum expected cell frequency is 14,8.
Page 1 and 2: The Application of Fundamental Anal
Page 3 and 4: Korean stock returns during the per
Page 5 and 6: to fund their allowances, their cas
Page 7 and 8: specific attributes of the particul
Page 9: Weigand, R.A. and Irons, R., 2005,
Page 13: Covariance cov Out of Time Savings

The Application of Fundamental Analysis and Technical ... - mibes

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?