16.10.2014 Views

Establishing Marine Protected Area Networks - Georgia Strait Alliance

Establishing Marine Protected Area Networks - Georgia Strait Alliance

Establishing Marine Protected Area Networks - Georgia Strait Alliance

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

W<br />

HAT<br />

ARE THE BROADER<br />

CONSIDERATIONS NEEDED TO<br />

ENSURE THAT MPA NETWORKS<br />

ARE SET IN CONTEXT?<br />

To help ensure the success of MPA networks, designers must also reflect on:<br />

Economic and social considerations:<br />

❏ Integrate the network into the economic and socio-cultural setting and<br />

promote activities that maximize positive benefits.Planners need to identify<br />

the broad costs and benefits provided by effectively managed MPA networks, as<br />

well as the indirect and opportunity costs incurred by people living in and around<br />

protected areas. One tool for making these calculations is economic valuation<br />

of consumptive and non-consumptive activities and non-use values, such as those<br />

provided by ecosystem services. Current social relationships and aspirations,<br />

cultural traditions and values, and political processes that influence attitudes and<br />

decisions about coastal and marine resource use and protection are also important<br />

considerations.<br />

❏ Evaluate the economies of scale provided by networks, as well as the<br />

costs of inaction. Network planners should consider the increased benefits and<br />

economies of scale when moving from an individual MPA to a network of MPAs,<br />

as well as the costs of inaction – that is, of not creating a network. For example,<br />

MPA networks may provide value-added benefits over individual MPAs, such as<br />

increased ecosystem services and reduced management costs per unit area.<br />

Spatial and temporal considerations reflect the<br />

fact that ecosystems function at different scales and<br />

change over time due to factors such as human<br />

activities or climate change. Planners should:<br />

❏ Take actions to address ecological processes,<br />

resources and impacts that extend beyond network<br />

boundaries or influence MPA networks.<br />

Network design must account for connectivity<br />

within and between networks, as well as the<br />

impacts of activities outside network boundaries,<br />

including upstream areas such as catchments. Given<br />

the fluid nature of the ocean environment, network<br />

planners must apply all available information on<br />

biological, chemical, and physical linkages–within<br />

the network and beyond.<br />

❏ Address the concept of “shifting baselines”<br />

in network design. The “shifting baseline syndrome”<br />

is the failure of managers and decision makers<br />

to fully grasp the enormous changes that have<br />

occurred in ocean ecosystems because they have<br />

occurred gradually over many years. Managers<br />

often fail to see that their baseline already represents<br />

a disturbed state.Therefore, it is especially<br />

important that planners set historically appropriate<br />

objectives for the MPA network.<br />

Scientific and information management<br />

considerations. Science and information play<br />

fundamental roles in planning and implementing<br />

MPA networks. Yet managers must do more than<br />

apply available information; they must seek new<br />

information that is pertinent to management and<br />

create mechanisms for gathering such information.<br />

Network planners and managers should:<br />

❏ Develop and employ appropriate scientific<br />

skills, tools, training and partnerships to design<br />

and systematically monitor MPA networks.<br />

Planners can address this in a number of ways: by<br />

setting research priorities and training requirements<br />

based on management needs; by creating auditing<br />

science programs that seek to assess and optimize<br />

results; and/or by incorporating end-user and<br />

manager input into multi-annual scientific work<br />

programs.<br />

❏ Ensure standardization, synthesis, storage<br />

and access to information across and among<br />

MPA networks. Information on individual MPAs<br />

may be scattered across institutions and /or individuals.<br />

Planners should foster coordination among<br />

institutions, develop information archives and create<br />

mechanisms for ensuring broad access to information.<br />

Such systems should be actively managed and<br />

should provide relevant historical data as well as<br />

current scientific knowledge.<br />

Institutional and governance considerations.<br />

Institutional and governance arrangements can have<br />

a significant effect on network design and management.<br />

In some cases, these institutional arrangements<br />

have taken shape over many years and were devised<br />

to meet the demands of the time, rather than the<br />

need for developing representative and effectively<br />

managed MPA networks or meeting sustainability<br />

objectives. Network planners and managers should,<br />

therefore:<br />

❏ Develop and maintain effective coordination<br />

and linkages across sectors and jurisdictions.<br />

Government agencies often fail to coordinate their<br />

marine-based activities, resulting in a divided and<br />

insular management approach aligned with sectorbased<br />

laws.This can mean duplication of effort, failure<br />

to address cumulative impacts and a poor outcome<br />

8 | <strong>Establishing</strong> <strong>Marine</strong> <strong>Protected</strong> <strong>Area</strong> <strong>Networks</strong> <strong>Establishing</strong> <strong>Marine</strong> <strong>Protected</strong> <strong>Area</strong> <strong>Networks</strong> | 9

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!