Sponsorship Appeals - Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Gill, Ranjit Singh v. M.C.I. (IAD VA2-03074), Kang, November 12, 2003 ............................................................... 15 Glaw, Gerhard Franz v. M.C.I. (IAD T97-02268), Townshend, July 21, 1998.......................................................... 14 Habib, Mussarat v. M.C.I. (F.C. no. IMM-5262-06), Harrington, May 16, 2007; 2007 FC 524 ................................ 10 Hamid, Abdul v. M.C.I. (F.C., no. IMM-872-06), Martineau, February 26, 2007; 2007 FC 220.......................... 26, 29 Harripersaud, Janet Rameena v. M.C.I. (IAD TA3-11611), Sangmuah, June 30, 2005 ............................................ 30 Heera: M.C.I. v. Heera, Lilloutie (F.C.T.D., no. IMM-5316-93), Noël, October 27, 1994. .................................... 4, 8 Horbas v. Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration), [1985] 2 F.C. 359 (T.D.)........................................... 5 Jassar, Surjit Singh v. M.C.I. (IAD V94-01705), Lam, May 14, 1996........................................................................ 12 Johal, Surinder Singh v. M.E.I. (IAD V87-6546), Wlodyka, Singh, Verma, February 15, 1989................................ 13 Judge, Mansoor Ali v. M.C.I. (IAD TA3-20841), Leonoff, July 25, 2005 ................................................................... 14 Jung, Harry Kam v. M.E.I. (I.A.B. 84-6237), D. Davey, Chambers, Anderson, May 17, 1985.................................. 10 Kahlon, Darshan Singh v. M.E.I. (F.C.A., no. A-115-86), Mahoney, Stone, MacGuigan, February 6, 1989. Reported: Kahlon v. Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration) (1989), 7 Imm. L.R. (2d) 91 (F.C.A.) ................................................................................................................. 8, 18 Kaloti v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [2000] 3 F.C. 390 (C.A.) ................................ 22, 24, 27 Kang, Randip Singh v. M.C.I. (IAD VA2-02099), Clark, June 3, 2003 ........................................................................ 6 Kaur, Amarjit v. M.C.I. (IAD T97-03654), Buchanan, June 24, 1999 ........................................................................ 17 Kaur, Gurmit v. C.E.I.C. (F.C.T.D., no. T-2490-84), Jerome, May 8, 1985 ............................................................... 17 Khan, Mohammed Farid v. M.C.I. (F.C. no. IMM-2971-06), Hughes, December 13, 2006; 2006 FC 1490................................................................................................................................................................... 11 Khella, Kulwinder Kaur v. M.E.I. (IAD V89-00179), Singh, Angé, Verma, June 29, 1989....................................... 18 Khella, Palwinder Singh v. M.C.I. (F.C. no. IMM-1811-06), de Montingny, November 10, 2006; 2006 FC 1357............................................................................................................................................................ 5 Khera, Amarjit v. M.C.I. (F.C. no. IMM-6375-06), Martineau, June 13, 2007; 2007 FC 632 ........................ 5, 6, 8, 10 Klair, Paramjit v. M.C.I. (IAD TA4-09098), Sangmuah, February 22, 2006 ............................................................. 29 Li v. M.C.I. (F.C. no. IMM-5040-05), Lemieux, June 14, 2006; 2006 FC 757 ........................................................... 28 Litt, Gurdev Singh v. M.C.I. (V99-03351), Baker, December 18, 2000 ...................................................................... 25 Lorenz, Hubert Calvin v. M.C.I. (IAD VA6-00444), Nest, June 15, 2007.................................................................... 7 Lu, Hung Xuong (Roy) v. M.C.I. (IAD VA2-02237), Workun, March 24, 2004......................................................... 28 Sponsorship Appeals 33 Legal Services January 1, 2008 Bad Faith Family Relationships - Ch. 6
Lundrigan Group Ltd. v. Pilgrim (1989), 75 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 217 (Nfld. C.A.)......................................................... 26 Machin et al v. Tomlison (2000), 51 OR (3d) (OCA).................................................................................................. 20 Maire, Beata Jolanta v. M.C.I. (F.C.T.D., no. IMM-5420-98), Sharlow, July 28, 1999............................................. 10 Malik, Estelita v. M.E.I. (I.A.B. 86-4271), Rayburn, Goodspeed, Petryshyn, April 11, 1988 .................................... 10 Mann, Jagdeep Kaur v. M.C.I. (IAD TA3-19094), Stein, August 5, 2005 ................................................................. 16 Mann, Paramjit Kaur v. M.E.I. (IAD V89-00516), Chambers, Gillanders, Verma, March 20, 1990 ......................... 18 Mann, Pitter Ali Ram v. M.C.I. (IAD TA6-13395), Band, December 21, 2007 at paragraphs 15 and 16...................................................................................................................................................................... 17 Mansro, Gurmel Singh v. M.C.I. (IAD VA6-00931), Miller, July 18, 2007 ............................................................... 13 Mariano, Edita Palacio v. M.C.I. (IAD WA5-00122), Lamont, September 20, 2006 ................................................ 29 Martin, Juliee v. M.C.I. (IAD V95-00961), Lam, October 18, 1996........................................................................... 11 Martin: M.C.I. v. Martin, Juliee Ida (F.C.T.D., no. IMM-4068-96), Heald, August 13, 1997 .................................. 11 Melo, Eduardo Manuel v. M.C.I. (IAD T94-07953), Hoare, February 7, 2001 .......................................................... 25 Mohamed, Rodal Houssein v. M.C.I. (F.C. no. IMM-6790-05), Beaudry, June 5, 2006; 2006 FC 696............................................................................................................................................................................. 5 Mohammed, Amina v. M.C.I. (F.C. no. IMM-1436-05), Shore, October 27, 2005; 2005 FC 1442 ............................ 28 Morris, Lawrence v. M.C.I. (F.C. no. IMM-5045-04), Pinard, March 18, 2005; 2005 FC 369 .................................... 8 Ni, Zhi Qi v. M.C.I. (F.C. no. IMM-4385-04), Pinard, February 17, 2005; 2005 FC 241............................................. 6 Nijjar (Mann), Gurtejpal Kaur v. M.C.I. (IAD V98-03483), Borst, December 8, 2000 ............................................. 25 Nirwan: M.C.I v. Nirwan, Malkiat Singh (IAD VA0-01903), Clark, April 24, 2001................................................. 26 O’Brien v. Canada (1993), 153 N.R. 313 (FCA) ........................................................................................................ 22 Ouk, Chanta v. M.C.I. (F.C. no. IMM-865-07), Mosley, September 7, 2007; 2007 FC 891............................... 5, 6, 13 Owens, Christine Janet v. M.E.I. (F.C.A., no. A-615-83), Urie, Le Dain, Marceau, March 27, 1984 ........................ 17 Owusu, Margaret v. M.C.I. (F.C. no. IMM-1402-06), Harrington, October 6, 2006; 2006 FC 1195 ......................... 10 Parmar, Charanjit Singh v. M.C.I. (IAD V98-04542), Boscariol, November 23, 1999 ............................................. 14 Parmar, Kuljit Kaur v. M.C.I. (IAD VA1-03015), Boscariol, May 13, 2002 ............................................................. 27 Pillai, Rajkumar Vadugaiyah v. M.C.I., (F.C.T.D., Imm-6124-00), Gibson, December 21, 2001.............................. 21 R. v. Duhamel (1984), 57 A.R. 204 (S.C.C.) ............................................................................................................... 22 Sponsorship Appeals 34 Legal Services January 1, 2008 Bad Faith Family Relationships - Ch. 6
Page 1 and 2:
Immigration Appeal Division SPONSOR
Page 3 and 4:
Introduction Introduction This pape
Page 5 and 6:
A decision of the Immigration Appea
Page 7 and 8:
Chapter One Financial Refusals and
Page 9 and 10:
jurisdiction if the application was
Page 11 and 12:
Requirements for the Sponsor A spon
Page 13 and 14:
different methodology and reliance
Page 15 and 16:
Transitional Issues The transitiona
Page 17 and 18:
Singh Chahal, Balwinder v. M.C.I. (
Page 19 and 20:
This chapter will therefore deal on
Page 21 and 22:
convictions under Canadian federal
Page 23 and 24:
The Canadian criminal law provision
Page 25 and 26:
• “serious criminality” - equ
Page 27 and 28:
There is a distinction between para
Page 29 and 30:
elements correspond. One must, of c
Page 31 and 32:
In a judicial review from a visa of
Page 33 and 34:
o o o they have not in the last 10
Page 35 and 36:
applicant provided material to esta
Page 37 and 38:
CASES Aguilar: M.C.I. v. Aguilar, V
Page 39 and 40:
Perry, Ivelaw Barrington v. M.C.I.
Page 41 and 42:
(ii) their admission would cause or
Page 43 and 44:
(d) in the case of public safety, "
Page 45 and 46:
ecause the medical reports had expi
Page 47 and 48:
Where the Medical Notification form
Page 49 and 50:
The failure to avail oneself of the
Page 51 and 52:
It is therefore open to an appellan
Page 53 and 54:
medical officer to re-consider. Thi
Page 55 and 56:
addicted to drugs automatically bri
Page 57 and 58:
insured health services is expressl
Page 59 and 60:
Thangarajan 104 and in Yogeswaran 1
Page 61 and 62:
IRPA now sets out the impact of an
Page 63 and 64:
Colaco, Peter Anthony v. M.C.I. (F.
Page 65 and 66:
Mahey: M.C.I. v. Mahey, Gulshan (F.
Page 67 and 68:
Chapter Four Adoptions A child who
Page 69 and 70:
country in which the adoption takes
Page 71 and 72:
whether or not the child is an only
Page 73 and 74:
*“declaratory judgment”: a judg
Page 75 and 76:
the child into Canada so that he co
Page 77 and 78:
[i]t is the opinion of the Board th
Page 79 and 80:
the absence of cogent evidence, tha
Page 81 and 82:
sponsor’s biological father in an
Page 83 and 84:
In Singh 76 the Immigration Appeal
Page 85 and 86:
(iii) where the adoption is an inte
Page 87 and 88:
followed in the country of convicti
Page 89 and 90:
An issue that arose after the IRPA
Page 91 and 92:
Dooprajh, Anthony v. M.C.I. (IAD M9
Page 93 and 94:
Taggar: Canada (Minister of Employm
Page 95 and 96:
a foreign national from being consi
Page 97 and 98:
the relationship is not genuine and
Page 99 and 100:
The validity of a marriage in the j
Page 101 and 102:
The Immigration Appeal Division has
Page 103 and 104:
The validity of the marriage “und
Page 105 and 106:
A prior marriage is dissolved by di
Page 107 and 108:
The criteria enunciated in M. v. H.
Page 109 and 110:
The question is essentially whether
Page 111 and 112:
Section 1(2) of the IRP Regulations
Page 113 and 114: The relationship of “conjugal par
Page 115 and 116: also considered an offence under Ca
Page 117 and 118: Note, however, that local legislati
Page 119 and 120: Note also that subsection 22(3) of
Page 121 and 122: The constitutionality of s. 117(9)(
Page 123 and 124: According to s. 4 of the IRP Regula
Page 125 and 126: turn around and resume their previo
Page 127 and 128: CASES Adjani, Joshua Taiwo v. M.C.I
Page 129 and 130: Laforge, Robert v. M.C.I. (IAD MA3-
Page 131 and 132: Taggar: Canada (Minister of Employm
Page 133 and 134: In 2004 2 a new provision, Section
Page 135 and 136: adopted before having attained 19 y
Page 137 and 138: section 4(3) of the former Regulati
Page 139 and 140: prong of the new test? It will also
Page 141 and 142: As noted by the Court in Roopchand
Page 143 and 144: the couple. 53 In Froment, 54 the C
Page 145 and 146: couple. The conclusion reached by t
Page 147 and 148: An issue that often arises in a sec
Page 149 and 150: D) Marriage after commencement, but
Page 151 and 152: B) Doctrine of Res Judicata Res Jud
Page 153 and 154: Abuse of process is a particularly
Page 155 and 156: F) Using Res Judicata and Abuse of
Page 157 and 158: evidence justifying a new hearing i
Page 159 and 160: Immigration Appeal Division panel h
Page 161 and 162: not just applications by foreign na
Page 163: Chow, Wing Ken v. M.E.I. (I.A.B. 86
Page 167 and 168: Tabesh, Rita v. M.C.I. (IAD VA3-009
Page 169 and 170: Membership in the family class is d
Page 171 and 172: (b) a genuine parent-child relation
Page 173 and 174: and/or her right to security of per
Page 175 and 176: The transitional provisions 44 of t
Page 177 and 178: The current definition refers to th
Page 179 and 180: In Bains, 61 the issue was whether
Page 181 and 182: or not the condition was diagnosed
Page 183 and 184: CASES Adjani, Joshua Taiwo v. M.C.I
Page 185 and 186: Chapter Eight Misrepresentation Int
Page 187 and 188: In Wang 4 the IAD adopted the Immig
Page 189 and 190: An inadmissibility report prepared
Page 191 and 192: Transitional Issues Section 192 of
Page 193 and 194: Chapter Nine Non-compliance with th
Page 195 and 196: Meaning of “permanently” The or
Page 197 and 198: Timing In appeals where the issue i
Page 199 and 200: Failure to answer truthfully or pro
Page 201 and 202: Molice, Antoine Anel v. M.E.I. (IAD
Page 203 and 204: (f) complies with international hum
Page 205 and 206: […] The need to establish the con
Page 207 and 208: Along with these considerations the
Page 209 and 210: EVIDENCE Burden of Proof Before a d
Page 211 and 212: The Immigration Appeal Division has
Page 213 and 214: Given the open ended language of su
Page 215 and 216:
• the relative availability of he
Page 217 and 218:
CASES Ahmed, Muhammad Jamail v. M.E
Page 219 and 220:
Thamber, Avtar Singh v. M.C.I. (F.C
Page 221 and 222:
Content of the Duty of Fairness Gen
Page 223 and 224:
Delay In order for delay in process
Page 225 and 226:
addresses reopening in a removal or
Page 227 and 228:
MPSEP v. Cha, Jung Woo (F.C.A., no.
Page 229 and 230:
This means a person is admissible w
Page 231 and 232:
CASES Sahakyan, Sergey v. M.C.I. (F
Page 233 and 234:
Section 196 of IRPA applies to spon
Page 235 and 236:
Refusals based on the sponsor’s f
Page 237 and 238:
‣ Refusals based on financial gro
Page 239:
CASES Alleg, Sahila v. M.C.I. (F.C.
show all

Sponsorship Appeals - Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?