ALI-ABA Course of Study Modern Real Estate Transactions July 25 ...
ALI-ABA Course of Study Modern Real Estate Transactions July 25 ...
ALI-ABA Course of Study Modern Real Estate Transactions July 25 ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
2298<br />
3. Specific performance.<br />
a. Landlord’s breach <strong>of</strong> contract to lease. See Ryan v. Stanger Inv.<br />
Co., 620 S.W.2d 505 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1981) (contract to lease is<br />
specifically enforceable); Wetherbee, Ltd. v. Allred, 969 S.W.2d<br />
756 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998).<br />
b. Landlord’s breach <strong>of</strong> a covenant to repair. See F.G. Madera,<br />
Annotation, Rights and Remedies <strong>of</strong> Tenant Upon Landlord’s<br />
Breach <strong>of</strong> Covenant to Repair, 28 A.L.R. 2d 446, 473 (1953 &<br />
Supp. 2003); Lucas v. Evans, 453 So. 2d 141 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App.<br />
1984) (Tenant was entitled to specific performance <strong>of</strong> Landlord’s<br />
repair covenant); but see also Boroch<strong>of</strong>f Props., Inc. v. Creative<br />
Printing Enters., Inc., 233 Ga. 279, 210 S.E.2d 809 (1974) (right to<br />
make repairs and recover costs and right to recover damages were<br />
adequate remedies at law); Continental & Vogue Health Studios,<br />
Inc. v. Abra Corporation, 369 Mich. 561, 120 N.W.2d 835 (1963)<br />
(no specific performance where remedy at law is adequate).<br />
c. Landlord’s breach <strong>of</strong> a restrictive covenant. See N.H. Donuts, Inc.<br />
v. Skiptaris, 129 N.H. 774, 533 A.2d 351 (1987) (Landlord ordered<br />
to remove a building that blocked premises from view <strong>of</strong> highway,<br />
in violation <strong>of</strong> covenant).<br />
4. Injunctive relief.<br />
a. Continuous or repeated acts creating a nuisance. See 49 AM. JUR.<br />
2d Landlord and Tenant § 544 (1995 & Supp. 2002) (injunction<br />
available under some circumstances).<br />
b. Other types <strong>of</strong> breaches <strong>of</strong> the covenant <strong>of</strong> quiet enjoyment. See<br />
Med Mac <strong>Real</strong>ty Co., Inc. v. Lemer, 154 A.D.2d 656, 547 N.Y.S.2d<br />
65 (1989) (Landlord was enjoined from interfering with Tenant’s<br />
alterations and sublease, which were permitted under lease); Am.<br />
Warehousing Servs., Inc. v. Weitzman, 169 Ill. App. 3d 708, 523<br />
N.E.2d 1082 (1988) (temporary restraining order was proper to<br />
prevent Landlord from using self-help remedy to block Tenant’s<br />
customers’ access to premises during rent dispute); S.E. Nichols,<br />
Inc. v. Am. Shopping Ctrs., Inc., 115 A.D.2d 856, 495 N.Y.S.2d<br />
810 (1985) (injunctive relief is available to prevent enforcement <strong>of</strong><br />
Landlord’s remedies until rights <strong>of</strong> parties can be settled, but only<br />
if requested before expiration <strong>of</strong> cure period for Tenant’s alleged<br />
default); Long Island Gynecological Serv. v. 1103 Stewart Ave.<br />
Assocs. Ltd. P’ship, 224 A.D.2d 591, 638 N.Y.S.2d 959 (1996)<br />
(Tenant able to obtain Yellowstone injunction even though sought<br />
after end <strong>of</strong> cure period because Tenant demonstrated that if could<br />
not cure the default within the prescribed thirty-day period);<br />
QBMKE\5422644.4<br />
- 2 -