Messianic Wonders and Skeptical Rationalists - Hakirah.org
Messianic Wonders and Skeptical Rationalists - Hakirah.org
Messianic Wonders and Skeptical Rationalists - Hakirah.org
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Messianic</strong> <strong>Wonders</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Skeptical</strong> <strong>Rationalists</strong> : 221<br />
propose other reasons for Rabbi Yochanan’s condemnation. If Rabbi<br />
Yochanan was not speaking literally, then this account is hardly an<br />
attack against rationalism, but rather against those who do not interpret<br />
the Sages in a rationalist way.<br />
We therefore have an extraordinary situation which sets rationalists<br />
<strong>and</strong> traditionalists at polar extremes. In explaining Rabbi<br />
Yochanan’s definition of a heretic, rationalists <strong>and</strong> traditionalists each<br />
see the other as the focus of Rabbi Yochanan’s condemnation. The<br />
traditionalists see Rabbi Yochanan as castigating his student for being<br />
a rationalist, while the rationalists see Rabbi Yochanan as castigating<br />
his student for not realizing that he himself was a rationalist. 48 This<br />
story demonstrates the enormous consequences that emerge from the<br />
difference between rationalists <strong>and</strong> traditionalists. Yet, at the same<br />
time, we see that both rationalists <strong>and</strong> traditionalists of today can<br />
each point to a long history of authorities whose approach they are<br />
following. The first step towards peaceful coexistence is underst<strong>and</strong>ing<br />
the opposite position, <strong>and</strong> appreciating its long history in the authorities<br />
of the past. ∗<br />
48 However, Rabbeinu Avraham ben HaRambam writes that while the<br />
literalist interpretation is wrong, it does no harm provided that one<br />
does not reject the interpretation as a result. Rambam, on the other<br />
h<strong>and</strong>, writes that literalist interpretations make a mockery of the Sages.<br />
∗<br />
I would like to thank all those who helped me in discussing <strong>and</strong> debating<br />
this essay, especially Rabbi Nesanel Neuman <strong>and</strong> David Sidney.