01.11.2014 Views

Canola Digest, January 2013 - SaskCanola

Canola Digest, January 2013 - SaskCanola

Canola Digest, January 2013 - SaskCanola

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

LEVERAGING RESEARCH<br />

HOW DO INPUTS<br />

ADD UP?<br />

By Heidi Dancho<br />

A recent study proves the importance of<br />

optimizing fertilizer, herbicides and genetics<br />

to produce high and stable yields.<br />

hen canola is properly<br />

managed, yield improving inputs – like<br />

better genetics, fertility and herbicides,<br />

are additive; they build on each other to<br />

improve yield,” says Eric Johnson, weed<br />

biologist with Agriculture and Agri-Food<br />

Canada (AAFC) in Scott, Saskatchewan.<br />

“The result is that by combining them,<br />

we produce even higher yields,” confirms<br />

Stewart Brandt, former AAFC researcher<br />

and current research manager with<br />

the Northeast Agricultural Research<br />

Foundation in Melfort, Saskatchewan.<br />

With funding through the Prairie <strong>Canola</strong><br />

Agronomic Research Program, Johnson<br />

and Brandt led a four year canola-barley<br />

cropping sequence study to determine<br />

the effect of adding and removing inputs<br />

to both empty and full input systems.<br />

Researchers examined the impact of<br />

full and 50 percent rates of fertilizer,<br />

herbicide and seed, as well as removing<br />

fertilizer and herbicide completely,<br />

and replacing a hybrid with an open<br />

pollinated variety.<br />

“When canola is properly<br />

managed, yield improving<br />

inputs are additive;<br />

they build on each other<br />

to improve yield.”<br />

– Eric Johnson<br />

<strong>Canola</strong> input study at Scott, Saskatchewan shows the difference between the full input<br />

treatment plot (left) and empty input plot (right).<br />

In addition to illustrating how inputs<br />

build on each other to improve yield,<br />

the study demonstrated the risk of input<br />

reductions on canola yield and yield<br />

variability over time.<br />

FERTILIZER AND HERBICIDES<br />

“The study showed that there is some<br />

opportunity for perhaps reducing<br />

fertilizer or herbicides inputs for one<br />

year without a huge impact on yield,<br />

but if you continue to do this, it definitely<br />

increases your risk and greatly reduces<br />

yields,” says Johnson.<br />

For example, the study found that while<br />

cutting fertilizer rate by 50 percent had<br />

no effect on yield in year one, it resulted<br />

in yield reductions of eight, 14 and<br />

22 percent respectively in years two<br />

to four. Removing fertilizer completely<br />

resulted in yield reductions of 17, 23, 30<br />

and 38 percent respectively. Eliminating<br />

herbicides did not result in lower yields<br />

in year one, however it severely reduced<br />

yield in years two to four by 31, 60 and<br />

76 percent respectively.<br />

continued on page 14<br />

13<br />

CANOLA DIGEST JANUARY <strong>2013</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!