02.11.2014 Views

Internal Audit and Compliance - Health Care Compliance Association

Internal Audit and Compliance - Health Care Compliance Association

Internal Audit and Compliance - Health Care Compliance Association

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Government enforcement of quality ...continued from page 13<br />

fact that Congress has increased the OIG’s<br />

matching-grant money by $25 million each<br />

year for the next five years for bolstering state<br />

Medicaid Fraud Control Units, fraud cases<br />

focused on the quality of patient care can<br />

only be expected to increase. 35<br />

Integrating quality <strong>and</strong> compliance<br />

What does this mean for providers today, <strong>and</strong><br />

how does this change the role of compliance<br />

officers? It is clear that hospitals can no longer<br />

consider quality an issue that can be addressed<br />

through its normal peer review <strong>and</strong> quality programs.<br />

Unless hospitals link compliance with<br />

quality <strong>and</strong> peer review programs, they may well<br />

find themselves defending a fraud case for filing<br />

claims for services ultimately deemed medically<br />

unnecessary or of poor quality. <strong>Health</strong> care<br />

fraud cases present a far greater risk to hospitals<br />

than malpractice claims (the historical risk faced<br />

by hospitals when care was challenged as subst<strong>and</strong>ard<br />

or unnecessary). Fraud claims are not<br />

covered by insurance, cost thous<strong>and</strong>s to defend<br />

<strong>and</strong> millions to settle, gain public notoriety,<br />

may lead to both criminal <strong>and</strong> civil penalties,<br />

<strong>and</strong> undermine public confidence in the quality<br />

of care provided by the hospital.<br />

So, what should hospitals do now? First <strong>and</strong><br />

foremost, hospital compliance officers must<br />

work h<strong>and</strong>-in-h<strong>and</strong> with hospital administration,<br />

risk managers, quality officers, the<br />

medical staff office, <strong>and</strong> medical staff peer<br />

review committees. Lack of medical necessity<br />

<strong>and</strong> subst<strong>and</strong>ard care should be recognized<br />

as potential compliance issues, <strong>and</strong> should be<br />

included among the other issues addressed by<br />

compliance. Environmental risk assessments<br />

(a component of most hospital compliance<br />

programs), compliance policies, <strong>and</strong> st<strong>and</strong>ards<br />

of conduct should all be revised to tie together<br />

quality, risk management, peer review,<br />

<strong>and</strong> compliance.<br />

Second, compliance education programs<br />

should include information about the link<br />

between the delivery of quality, medically<br />

necessary care, <strong>and</strong> the requirements that<br />

must be met to bill for services. Quality <strong>and</strong><br />

risk management officials need to know<br />

whom to contact in the compliance department<br />

when they uncover instances of poor<br />

quality or unnecessary care, <strong>and</strong> compliance<br />

personnel need to know when to contact legal<br />

counsel to determine whether a risk of health<br />

care fraud may exist, <strong>and</strong> if so, what actions<br />

should be taken.<br />

Finally, compliance auditing <strong>and</strong> monitoring<br />

programs need to be integrated with quality<br />

chart reviews, risk management incident<br />

reporting systems, <strong>and</strong> peer review investigations<br />

to ensure that patterns of poor quality<br />

or medically unnecessary care are identified<br />

quickly <strong>and</strong> corrected. Part of any corrective<br />

action plan developed to address a pattern of<br />

unnecessary or poor quality care should also<br />

evaluate the impact on reimbursement <strong>and</strong><br />

determine whether any repayment obligation<br />

may exist.<br />

The government’s focus on quality will grow<br />

in the coming years. Faced with the increasing<br />

pressure to hold down costs while making<br />

the American health care system safer, the<br />

government likely will use the FCA more<br />

often to challenge poor quality or unnecessary<br />

care. Unless proper steps are taken to integrate<br />

quality into the compliance program, a<br />

hospital could face disastrous consequences,<br />

including fines, penalties, damage to reputation,<br />

<strong>and</strong> a loss of confidence by physicians<br />

<strong>and</strong> patients. And, unlike many of the other<br />

compliance issues that hospitals face, allegations<br />

of unnecessary or poor quality care can<br />

take years to overcome.<br />

Sophisticated hospital compliance officers<br />

will make sure that quality <strong>and</strong> peer review<br />

are integrated into the hospital’s compliance<br />

program, so that circumstances that could<br />

give rise to FCA liability can be addressed<br />

before the government, the press, or other<br />

critics intervene. n<br />

1 In most jurisdictions, a hospital is held liable for malpractice committed<br />

by members of its independent medical staff only if the hospital itself was<br />

negligent because it either failed to respond appropriately when it knew or<br />

should have known of the risk to a patient or because it failed to establish<br />

<strong>and</strong> follow appropriate policies to guide quality of care. See Andrea G.<br />

Nadel, J.D., Hospital’s Liability For Negligence In Failing To Review Or<br />

Supervise Treatment Given By Doctor Or Require Consultation, 12 A.L.R.<br />

4th 57 (1982).<br />

2 Information on False Claims Act Litigation, GAO Briefing for Congressional<br />

Requesters, December 15, 2005, p. 28.<br />

3 United States v. United Memorial Hospital., WL 33001119 (D. Mich.<br />

2002) (denying defendant’s motion to dismiss).<br />

4 Tenet <strong>Health</strong>care Agrees to Pay $54 Million Settlement Over Alleged<br />

Unnecessary Surgeries at Redding Hospital, California <strong>Health</strong>line, Aug. 7,<br />

2003, http://www.californiahealthline.org/index.cfm?Action=dspItem&ite<br />

mID=95253&classed=CL350.<br />

5 Louisiana Hospital Settles Federal Claims of Billing for Medically Unnecessary<br />

Services, 10 BNA <strong>Health</strong> <strong>Care</strong> Fraud Reporter 679 (September 13,<br />

2006).<br />

6 See, e.g., A.M. Smith et al., Peer Review of the Quality of <strong>Care</strong>: Reliability<br />

<strong>and</strong> Sources of Variability for Outcome <strong>and</strong> Process Assessments, 278 J.<br />

Am. Med. Ass’n. 1573 (1997).<br />

7 <strong>Health</strong> <strong>Care</strong> Quality Improvement Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. § 11101.<br />

8 Committee on Quality of <strong>Health</strong> <strong>Care</strong> in America Committee on Institute<br />

of Medicine, To Err is Human: Building a Safer <strong>Health</strong> System (1999).<br />

9 Committee on Quality of <strong>Health</strong> <strong>Care</strong> in America, Institute of Medicine,<br />

Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New <strong>Health</strong> System for the 21st Century<br />

(2001).<br />

10 JCAHO’s launch of reporting on core measures was an outgrowth of its<br />

ORYX initiative which began in 1997 to integrate the use of outcome <strong>and</strong><br />

other performance measures into the accreditation process. See http://www.<br />

jointcommission.org/Jointcommission/Templates/GeneralInformation.asp.<br />

11 Center for Medicare <strong>and</strong> Medicaid Services, Hospital Quality Initiative<br />

Overview (Dec. 2005), http://www.cms.hhs.gov/HospitalQualityInits/<br />

downloads/HospitalOverview200512.pdf.<br />

12 www.hospitalcompare.com.<br />

13 False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729-3733.<br />

14 GAO Report at 5.<br />

15 Id. at 32.<br />

16 Id. at 25.<br />

17 False Claims Act Advocate Says Prosecuting FCA Cases is Good Investment<br />

for Government, 10 BNA <strong>Health</strong> <strong>Care</strong> Fraud Report 478 (2006).<br />

18 John J. Meyer et al., <strong>Health</strong> <strong>Care</strong> Fraud <strong>and</strong> Abuse: Enforcement <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>Compliance</strong>, BNA’s <strong>Health</strong> Law & Business Series (2006).<br />

19 Civil Rights of Institutionalized Persons Act (CRIPA), 42 U.S.C. § 1997.<br />

20 Meyer, supra, at 2600:0328.<br />

21 <strong>Health</strong> Insurance Portability <strong>and</strong> Accountability Act of 1996, 18 U.S.C. §<br />

1347.<br />

22 Meyer, supra, at 2600:0328(a).<br />

23 See John T. Boese, Civil False Claims <strong>and</strong> Qui tam Actions, (3rd Ed.<br />

Aspen Publishers (2006); Joan K. Krause, “Promises to Keep”: <strong>Health</strong> <strong>Care</strong><br />

Providers <strong>and</strong> the Civil False Claims Act, 23 Cardozo L. Rev. 1363, 1382<br />

(2002); Joan K. Krause, <strong>Health</strong> <strong>Care</strong> Fraud <strong>and</strong> Quality of <strong>Care</strong>: a Patient-<br />

Centered Approach, 37 J. <strong>Health</strong> L. 161 (2004).<br />

24 See John T. Boese, When Angry Patients Become Angry Prosecutors:<br />

Medical Necessity, 43 St. Louis U. L. J. 53 (1999); Meyer, supra, at<br />

200:0316.<br />

25 U.S. Attorney Eastern District of California, RMC/Tenet Settlement Fact<br />

Sheet.<br />

26 U.S. Office of the Attorney General, OIG <strong>and</strong> Tenet <strong>Health</strong>care Corporation<br />

Reach Divestiture Agreement to Address Exclusion of Redding<br />

Medical Center, OIG News, Dec. 11, 2003.<br />

27 Tenet <strong>Health</strong>care agrees to pay $54 Million Settlement over Alleged<br />

Unnecessary Surgeries at Redding Hospital, California <strong>Health</strong>line, Aug. 7,<br />

2003, http://www.californiahealthline.org/index.cfm?Action=dspItem&ite<br />

mID=95253&classcd=CL350.<br />

28 See, for example, United States ex rel. Swan v. Covenant <strong>Care</strong>, Inc., Case<br />

No. Civ. S‐99-1981, DFL JFM (E.D. Cal. June 20, 2000 <strong>and</strong> United States<br />

v. NHC <strong>Health</strong>care Corp., 115 F. Supp 2d 1149 (W.D. Mo. Aug. 30,<br />

2000).<br />

29 United States Attorney’s Office Eastern District of Pennsylvania, U.S.<br />

Attorney’s Office Reaches Agreement with Hospital to Failure of <strong>Care</strong><br />

Allegations Stemming from Improper Use of Patient Restraints, News<br />

Release, July 25, 2005.<br />

30 Quality of <strong>Care</strong> Issues to Remain Focus of False Claims Act Cases, Sheehan<br />

Says, 10 BNA’s <strong>Health</strong> <strong>Care</strong> Fraud Report, BNA’s <strong>Health</strong> <strong>Care</strong> Fraud<br />

Report, 169 (2006.).<br />

31 Id.<br />

32 OIG’s Morris Tells AHLA to Watch For Increase in False Claims Act Cases,<br />

10 BNA <strong>Health</strong> <strong>Care</strong> Fraud Report, 524 (2006).<br />

33 Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 at § 6031.<br />

34 Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, Pub. Law 109-171, § 6032.<br />

35 Testimony of Daniel R. Levinson, Inspector General, Hearing before the<br />

S. Comm. on Homel<strong>and</strong> Sec. <strong>and</strong> Gov’t Affairs, Subcomm. on Fed. Fin.<br />

Mgmt., Gov’t Info., <strong>and</strong> Intn’l Sec., 109th Cong. 1, 2 (2006.)<br />

November 2006<br />

14<br />

<strong>Health</strong> <strong>Care</strong> <strong>Compliance</strong> <strong>Association</strong> • 888-580-8373 • www.hcca-info.org

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!