04.11.2014 Views

thesis

thesis

thesis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Theoretical Foundations 67<br />

possible solution to the negative quantitative effect of closure on potential contributors<br />

might lie in multiple access layers, in liberal and flexible norms.<br />

A further approach to address the negative quantitative effect of closure on potential<br />

contributors is to discuss the core assumptions of peer production theory. Peer<br />

production is a viable production model as: social value is created in quantities and<br />

qualities unmatched by other modes of production, superior knowledge creation is<br />

enabled by free access to information and by contribution of persons from different<br />

provenance, and they are then free to experiment due to the lack of managerial,<br />

hierarchical specifications. While peer production has a strong normative societal<br />

impact, it also manages to deliver results. Simplified, the assumed superior or at<br />

least competitive product quality is the result of a large number of voluntary contributors<br />

combined with a high degree of openness of information and low investment<br />

costs for contributors. From the angle of the end result of the production<br />

process, the number of potential contributors is not the decisive variable. The key<br />

criterion is the number of those actually contributing and the value of their respective<br />

contributions. A community that needs to close itself off could invent governance<br />

mechanisms and techniques that enable it to accurately identify valuable<br />

potential contributors. Simplified, the product quality would then be the result of<br />

the assumed likelihood of contribution, the number of potential contributors and<br />

the value of individual contributions. Hence, likelihood and value can make up for<br />

less potential contributors. If a community thus manages to bring in talents willing<br />

to contribute, if it is opened to a substantial number of potential contributors, it<br />

might be able to compensate for the losses of excluding a large number of potential<br />

contributors.<br />

So much for the theorising about collaborative, distributed production under secrecy.<br />

The degree of secrecy required in reality, the impact on the production process,<br />

possibly governance techniques to mitigate the negative effects of secrecy on effectivity<br />

and costs of production — all of that might look entirely different from that<br />

which has been envisaged here. An exploratory journey into the world of Internet<br />

security production is to shed more light on these questions.<br />

2.4 Peer production of Internet security<br />

The rise of the Internet has nurtured a fascinating trend towards geographically<br />

distributed, self-organised collaboration driven mainly by individual persons. The<br />

poster-child of this new type of organisation in the production of informational<br />

goods has been free and open source software projects. Peer production and open

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!