05.11.2014 Views

In re Krystal Papcke, Case No. 99-24700, Bruce Lanser, Trustee v ...

In re Krystal Papcke, Case No. 99-24700, Bruce Lanser, Trustee v ...

In re Krystal Papcke, Case No. 99-24700, Bruce Lanser, Trustee v ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

FACTS<br />

The <strong>re</strong>levant facts a<strong>re</strong> as follows. The debtor, <strong>Krystal</strong> <strong>Papcke</strong>, formerly known as <strong>Krystal</strong><br />

Downs, filed for divorce from her husband, Paul Downs, on August 18, 1<strong>99</strong>7. While the divorce<br />

was pending, Mr. Downs became awa<strong>re</strong> that a worker's compensation award was forthcoming to<br />

Ms. <strong>Papcke</strong>. Concerned that the funds might be dissipated if they we<strong>re</strong> paid to Ms. <strong>Papcke</strong><br />

befo<strong>re</strong> the court divided the couple’s property, Mr. Downs demanded that those funds be<br />

included in the martial estate. He filed a motion to modify the temporary order to bring those<br />

funds within the court's jurisdiction. The court orde<strong>re</strong>d Ms. <strong>Papcke</strong>'s attorney to deposit the<br />

worker's compensation proceeds into his trust account until further di<strong>re</strong>ction of the court.<br />

Befo<strong>re</strong> trial, the parties ente<strong>re</strong>d into a partial settlement ag<strong>re</strong>ement <strong>re</strong>solving a number of<br />

issues un<strong>re</strong>lated to the transaction which is the subject of this action. Then, at the time of trial,<br />

the parties ente<strong>re</strong>d into an oral ag<strong>re</strong>ement, which the court incorporated into its Findings of Fact,<br />

Conclusions of Law and Judgment of Divorce, dated January 6, 1<strong>99</strong>9. (Judgment 11j.-l.).<br />

Appa<strong>re</strong>ntly, as a means to balance out the assets and debts of the marital estate, the parties ag<strong>re</strong>ed<br />

that Mr. <strong>Papcke</strong> <strong>re</strong>ceive the enti<strong>re</strong> amount of the funds held by Ms. <strong>Papcke</strong>’s attorney, which<br />

totaled $9,542. The sum was awarded to Mr. <strong>Papcke</strong> to obtain a <strong>re</strong>lease of a lien on a Pontiac<br />

Bonneville awarded to Mr. Downs. Ms. <strong>Papcke</strong> ag<strong>re</strong>ed to hold Mr. Downs harmless on the debt<br />

due her father for the purchase of the car, which the divorce dec<strong>re</strong>e states was in the original<br />

amount of $5,000. The funds we<strong>re</strong> disbursed to Mr. <strong>Papcke</strong> di<strong>re</strong>ctly from the trust account of<br />

Ms. <strong>Papcke</strong>'s attorney on January 7, 1<strong>99</strong>9. Ms. <strong>Papcke</strong> filed a petition for chapter 7 <strong>re</strong>lief on<br />

May10, 1<strong>99</strong>9.<br />

115:09/15/00 2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!