Faraday Rotation and Depolarization in AGN Jets

More documents

Recommendations

Info

1803+784 (BL Lac Object, z=0.68) Zavala & Taylor 2003 Udomprasert et al. 1997 OQ 172 (quasar, z = 3.53) Host galaxy rest frame RM is larger by (1+z) 2 = 20.5 here. For internal rotation in the jet, the comoving frame RM also includes (Doppler factor) -2 , which will typically be larger than the redshift effect, and in the opposite direction.
CLUES ABOUT THE ENVIRONMENT Connection to ISM, cloud interactions etc (Junor et al) Connection to AGN structure, inflow, outflow, unified models etc (Taylor et al)
Page 1 and 2: Faraday Rotation and Depolarization
Page 3 and 4: OUTLINE 1. Preliminaries - Faraday
Page 5 and 6: Preliminaries (1) χ(λ) = χ ο +
Page 7 and 8: Faraday Depolarization: This is due
Page 9 and 10: So how CAN you distinguish between
Page 11 and 12: ack back front front observed obser
Page 13 and 14: Corollary: If the observed EVPA rot
Page 15 and 16: "Core" rotation measures pre-VLBA V
Page 17 and 18: Radial distribution of rotation mea
Page 19: QUASARS: 3C 273 3C 279 3C 345 3C380
Page 23 and 24: Core Depolarization 43 and 86 GHz (
Page 25 and 26: Newspaper reporter: “Why do you r
Page 27 and 28: ∆χ = 60 o : minimum RMs are ± 2
Page 29 and 30: Transverse gradient of rotation mea
Page 31 and 32: Asada et al 2002 RM gradient = 70 r
Page 33 and 34: Zavala & Taylor 2005 • RM gradien
Page 35 and 36: ∆χ = 60 o 43 GHz Rotation measur
Page 37 and 38: 3C 273, epoch 1999.26, from 8, 15 a
Page 39 and 40: Is there a systematic component of
Page 41 and 42: There is a significant transverse g
Page 43 and 44: There is a significant transverse g
Page 45 and 46: 3C 273, epoch 1999.37 Total intensi
Page 47 and 48: The upper limit on the interior cur
Page 51: KONIEC

Faraday Rotation and Depolarization in AGN Jets

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?