AUSTRALIAN BIODIVERSITY RECORD - Calodema
AUSTRALIAN BIODIVERSITY RECORD - Calodema
AUSTRALIAN BIODIVERSITY RECORD - Calodema
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Australian Biodiversity Record, 2009 (3): 1-96<br />
and back and base of the tail as in the south-coastal NSW population. There is always a thin<br />
creamish, golden or pale yellowish dorsolateral stripe that runs from just above and behind<br />
the eye, along the nape (where it may be dark-edged along the upper edge), and along most<br />
of the body, but this stripe is most intense on the anterior of the body. This species only rarely<br />
possesses an obscure pale streak that extends from behind the eye to above the ear<br />
opening. The upper lateral zone of the body is usually black with scattered pale yellow or<br />
creamish speckles or spots that may have an irregular vertical alignment to them. However,<br />
some populations may have the upper lateral zone brownish rather than black. The lower<br />
lateral zone is creamish or creamish-yellow with dense black flecking which may form a<br />
darker variegated pattern posteriorly, and a finer, darker peppering pattern anteriorly. The<br />
upper parts of the limbs are the same colour as the dorsum, but with black flecks and small<br />
blotches, and the side of the original tail may be heavily speckled with black; regenerated tails<br />
are plain brown. Ventrally, whitish to creamish or creamish-yellow, with the throat, chin and<br />
infralabials finely flecked with blackish or dark bluish, and sometimes with a series of thin<br />
blackish or greyish lines formed from fine dotting under the throat, chest and venter. Some<br />
significant features of this species morphology are: body scales smooth in sub adult and<br />
mature specimens, but distinctly keeled in neonates, and in 36-44 rows at mid-body;<br />
paravertebrals similar in size or barely larger than adjacent dorsal scales, and numbering 74-<br />
88; prefrontals usually in broad contact; parietals in contact behind the interparietal;<br />
interparietal about 1.5 times longer than wide, and never separating parietals; supraoculars 4;<br />
mature specimens have the upper secondary temporals separated across the nape by four or<br />
five variable, obliquely aligned scales which contact the posterior margins of the parietals<br />
(usually comprised of 1-3 nuchals, plus the upper secondary temporals); supranasals usually<br />
absent; nasals separated; supralabials 7-8 (usually 7) (with 5 th or 6 th subocular); infralabials 7-<br />
10, with postmental in contact with first two or three infralabials on each side; lower eyelid<br />
movable and scaly; supraciliaries 9-12; ear-opening present and conspicuous (larger than<br />
nasal scale); no anterior ear lobules; well-developed pentadactyl limbs that strongly overlap<br />
when adpressed; hind limbs much longer than forelimbs; 4th toe much longer than the 3rd;<br />
base of 4th toe broad, with most lamellae with a median groove, and divided basally; 24-34<br />
subdigital lamellae (smooth) beneath 4th toe. Premaxillary teeth 7-9 (usually 9); Attains a<br />
maximum total length of around 350 mm., and a snout-vent length of about 140 mm, although<br />
most mature specimens would be slightly smaller, at around 280-300 mm in total length, and<br />
a SVL of around 100-120mm. Although females and males have similar snout-vent lengths,<br />
females tend to have larger body lengths. Variation in morphology suggests that this species<br />
is composite. There appears to be a taxonomically distinct population in the Mt Lofty Ranges<br />
of South Australia. An undescribed member of this species has also been known from mideastern<br />
and northern Queensland for nearly 50 years. A proposed Holotype (labelled as such)<br />
was even deposited in the Australian Museum by Eric Worrell, but his description was never<br />
published, I have examined this specimen and I am convinced that it is indeed a separate<br />
species quite distinct from quoyii. I have decided however to refrain from formally naming this<br />
species as Dr Glenn Shea has informed me that he is currently in the process of revising the<br />
Eulamprus quoyii complex. It is possible that Hinulia gastrosticta Günther, 1875 is applicable<br />
to one of these distinctive Queensland populations, and Wells and Wellington (1984)<br />
resurrected that species on the basis of the original description. However, I note also that<br />
Hutchinson and Rawlinson (1995) resynonymised Eulamprus gastrostictus with quoyii due to<br />
insufficient evidence that its earlier resurrection by Wells and Wellington was warranted.<br />
Although I have observed that “Eulamprus quoyii” exhibits quite distinct morphological<br />
differences in Queensland to that present in topotypic specimens from Sydney (the Type<br />
Locality of quoyii), I am now aware that there are at least two, possibly three distinct ‘forms’ of<br />
quoyii in Queensland. As the Type Locality of Hinulia gastrosticta Gunther, 1875 was given<br />
merely as ‘Queensland’, it is premature to assign this name to this or any other population in<br />
Queensland without examining the Holotype in the British Museum - which I am unable to do.<br />
The impending revision by Glenn Shea of the quoyii complex will hopefully resolve whether or<br />
not Hinulia gastrosticta is a valid taxon from Queensland, so I have accepted the decision of<br />
Hutchinson and Rawlinson and refrain from using the name further until the matter is resolved<br />
by Shea.<br />
Distribution: As currently defined, this species occurs over a large part of eastern Australia,<br />
ranging from about Cairns in north-eastern Queensland, south to the mid-south coast of New<br />
South Wales (including parts of the coastal section of the Australian Capital Territory at Jervis<br />
Bay), parts of the Murray-Darling River Basin of north-western and western NSW, north-<br />
14