17.11.2014 Views

Barbados - Carolina Population Center

Barbados - Carolina Population Center

Barbados - Carolina Population Center

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Barbados</strong> Caribbean Region HIV and AIDS Service Provision Assessment Survey 2005<br />

geographic coordinates of each facility. Although some facility surveys include<br />

observation of providers to assess the quality of care provided and interview of patients<br />

upon exiting the service, these are not a part of the HSPA.<br />

Each team received a list of facilities to be visited. Data collection took 1 day in most<br />

facilities, with 2 days allocated to hospitals, if required. In addition, if one of the<br />

observed services, such as VCT or PMTCT for example, was not being offered the day<br />

of the survey, or the health facility was closed for training or any other scheduled<br />

activity, the teams were to return on a day when the service was offered or the facility<br />

was open for clients.<br />

The team leader was instructed to ensure that the informant for each component of the<br />

facility survey was the most knowledgeable person for the particular health service or<br />

system component being addressed. Where relevant, the data collector indicated<br />

whether a specific item being assessed was observed, reported available but not<br />

observed, or not available, or whether it was uncertain whether the item was available.<br />

Equipment, supplies, and resources for specific services were required to be in the<br />

relevant service delivery area or in an immediately adjacent room to be accepted as<br />

available. Informed consent was taken from the facility director and from all other<br />

interviewed respondents and interviewed providers. Data collection teams were<br />

supervised throughout the field activities, and re-interviews were implemented for<br />

selected sections of the questionnaires for quality control.<br />

2.5.4 Process for Data Management and Report Writing<br />

After the data were collected, AID Inc. staff entered the results into CSPro using double<br />

data entry to ensure accurate keying of results. Two separate datasets were produced<br />

by (at least) two different data entry clerks. The two datasets were then compared for<br />

any keying errors. Errors found during the comparison were corrected to create a final<br />

dataset. A final dataset along with the original questionnaires were sent to MEASURE<br />

Evaluation/University of North <strong>Carolina</strong>, which completed the data analysis using<br />

STATA ® .<br />

The country report was written by MEASURE Evaluation/Macro technical staff and was<br />

vetted and revised with input from country representatives and stakeholders.<br />

St. George’s University, Grenada assisted with the final phase of the country report<br />

review and revisions. The final regional report will be written with input from MEASURE<br />

Evaluation/Macro technical staff and MOH officials responsible for the programs<br />

included in the survey.<br />

2.5.5 Data Analysis and Conventions Followed in Developing the<br />

Indicators<br />

The following conventions were observed during the analysis of the HSPA data:<br />

Assessing the availability of items. Unless specifically indicated, the HSPA<br />

considered observed items as available. HIV and AIDS services are frequently<br />

offered in various service sites within large facilities. For example, HIV testing may<br />

13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!