HCVF Assessments - PF Olsen Limited

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Three migratory species or their habitat likely to occur within 5 km of property: Migratory birds • White-bellied Sea-Eagle Haliaeetus leucogaster • Satin Flycatcher Myiagra cyanoleuca • Black-faced Monarch Monarcha melanopsis A further 14 threatened species and eight migratory species or their habitat may occur within 5 km of the property. This FMU is not considered High Conservation Value (1.2) according to the <strong>HCVF</strong> Toolkit as the FMU does not contain significant concentrations of rare or threatened species. HCV 1.3 Endemic species Yes No Notes: No endemic species are known to occur within the FMU. HCV 1.4 Critical temporal use Yes No Notes: The FMU does not provide habitat for maintaining significant temporal concentrations of species. HCV 2: Forest areas containing regionally significant large landscape level forests, contained within or containing the management unit, where viable populations of most if not all naturally occurring species exist in natural patterns of distribution and abundance. Notes: The FMU is not within a large forest area of native vegetation and fauna habitat. Yes No HCV 3: Forest areas that are in or contain rare, threatened or endangered ecosystems. Yes No Notes: Contains one vulnerable EVC: • Riparian Forest Contains one depleted EVC: • Lowland Forest Although the FMU contains only a small proportion of the Riparian Forest patch, this patch is the largest patch of Riparian Forest in the local area and is therefore considered High Conservation Value (3.0) according to the <strong>HCVF</strong> Toolkit. A site inspection will be required to verify the presence of Riparian Forest within the FMU. HCV 4: Forest areas that provide basic services of nature in critical situations (e.g. watershed protection, erosion control). HCV 4.1 Forests critical to water catchments Yes No Notes: The FMU does not play a critical role in protecting the catchment. HCV 4.2 Forests critical to erosion control Yes No Notes: Risk of erosion is negligible due to the relatively flat topography of the FMU.
HCV 4.3 Forests providing barriers to destructive fire Yes No Notes: The FMU does not contain forest types that provide barriers to destructive fires. HCV 5: Forests areas fundamental to meeting basic needs of local communities (e.g. subsistence, health, well-being). Notes: The FMU is not critical to the needs of local communities. HCV 6: Forest areas critical to local communities' traditional cultural identity (areas of cultural, ecological, economic or religious significance identified in cooperation with such local communities). Notes: There is no cultural association with the FMU. Yes Yes No No
Page 1 and 2: AUSTRALIA NEW ZEALAND FOREST INVEST
Page 3 and 4: HIGH CONSERVATION VALUE ASSESSMENTS
Page 5: Property Assessment for High Conser
Page 9 and 10: HIGH CONSERVATION VALUE ASSESSMENTS
Page 11 and 12: Three migratory species or their ha
Page 13: Merna 0 500 1000 1500 2000 m. Discl

HCVF Assessments - PF Olsen Limited

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?