journal - University of Maryland School of Law

More documents

Recommendations

Info

18 MD. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW & TRADE [Vol. 14 and eventually ban imports that are products of or contain CFCs, unless the country of origin has a similar phaseout program. Though this may not be economically advantageous to the U.S., it would be an effective weapon against potentially powerful Third World objections, especially if all developed countries were to adopt similar domestic measures. The United States should also consider using its trade leverage to effect an immediate worldwide ban on aerosol sprays. 1 The government must also be willing to explore other alternatives if projected reductions in CFC use fail to materialize as rapidly as expected. A proper starting point would be the promulgation of new regulations to prohibit the use of CFCs in cleansing agents by the nation's armed services. Finally, if alternatives are not developed quickly enough by industry, the government must be willing to establish a tax on ozone depleting chemicals. The EPA must also forge ahead with its proposal to impose a regulatory fee on CFC producers in order to remove any windfall profits generated from future supply restrictions. 62 VI. CONCLUSION The difficulties of achieving international consensus on effective regulations to protect the global atmosphere are enormous. They are dwarfed, however, by the potentially catastrophic consequences of failing to reach such consensus. The Montreal Protocol represents a momentous advance in international environmental cooperation, but it will not by itself solve the ozone depletion problem. The Protocol's controls must be strengthened, and the economic concerns of developing countries must be addressed to achieve a more rapid phaseout of CFCs. It is simply unfair to expect nations which consume a disproportionately small share of the world's resources to bear most of the burden for a crisis created largely by the developed world. The limited success achieved by the Montreal Protocol to date has raised the possibility of conquering ozone destruction. Now it has become necessary for the global community to recast the treaty in a form that will be fully effective. The ramifications of such an amended treaty's success will be significant beyond the problem of ozone depletion. For if the global community is able to overcome this one problem, 61. Despite a near total ban by the United States, many countries have not followed suit and are still using CFCs as propellants for aerosols. 62. See S3 Fed. Reg. 30604 (1988) (to be codified at 40 C.F.R. pt. 82) (proposed Aug. 12, 1988), for a more detailed explanation of the EPA's attempt to deal with unintended economic consequences of regulations adopted to implement the Montreal Protocol domestically.
1990] MONTREAL PROTOCOL 19 it will improve its chances of coping successfully with future environmental crises that are expected to be even more politically and economically challenging.
Page 1: MARYLAND JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL L
Page 5: MARYLAND JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL L
Page 8 and 9: 2 MD. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW
Page 27 and 28: K MART V. CARTIER: THE SUPREME COUR
Page 29 and 30: 1990] K MART v. CARTIER mon ownersh
Page 31 and 32: 19901 K MART v. CARTIER created by
Page 33 and 34: 1990] K MART v. CARTIER ered to be
Page 35 and 36: 1990] K MART v. CARTIER his concurr
Page 37 and 38: 1990] K MART v. CARTIER may not use
Page 39 and 40: 1990] K MART v. CARTIER Finally, th
Page 41 and 42: 1990] K MART v. CARTIER protection
Page 43 and 44: 19901 K MART v. CARTIER pie, Maryla
Page 45 and 46: 1990] K MART v. CARTIER require tha
Page 47: 19901 K MART v. CARTIER reconcile w
Page 74 and 75:
68 MD. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW
Page 76 and 77:
Page 78 and 79:
Page 81 and 82:
NOTE GREGORIAN v. IZVESTIA: AN ANAL
Page 83 and 84:
1990] GREGORIAN v. IZVESTIA of the
Page 85 and 86:
19901 GREGORIAN v. IZVESTIA cution.
Page 87 and 88:
1990] GREGORIAN v. IZVESTIA the lib
Page 89 and 90:
1990] GREGORIAN v. IZVESTIA II. STA
Page 91 and 92:
1990] GREGORIAN v. IZVESTIA Section
Page 93 and 94:
1990] GREGORIAN v. IZVESTIA bia, th
Page 95 and 96:
1990] GREGORIAN v. IZVESTIA rule. C
Page 97 and 98:
1990] GREGORIAN v. IZVESTIA the fin
Page 99 and 100:
1990] GREGORIAN v. IZVESTIA munist
Page 101 and 102:
1990] GREGORIAN v. IZVESTIA hands o
Page 103 and 104:
1990] GREGORIAN v. IZVESTIA viet St
Page 105 and 106:
NOTE THE ROLE OF INTERNATIONAL LAW
Page 107 and 108:
1990] INT'L LAW IN DOMESTIC COURTS
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
19901 INT'L LAW IN DOMESTIC COURTS
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131:
Page 134 and 135:
128 MD. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LA
Page 136 and 137:
Page 138 and 139:
Page 140 and 141:
Page 142 and 143:
Page 144 and 145:
Page 146 and 147:
Page 148 and 149:
Page 150 and 151:
Page 153 and 154:
BOOKS RECEIVED RESISTING PROTECTION
Page 155 and 156:
1990) BOOKS RECEIVED COFFEE AND DEM
Page 157 and 158:
1990] BOOKS RECEIVED THE TAIWAN REL
Page 159 and 160:
1990] BOOKS RECEIVED WORLD ECONOMIC
Page 161 and 162:
1990] BOOKS RECEIVED TREATY CONFLIC
Page 163 and 164:
1990] BOOKS RECEIVED HUMAN RIGHTS A
Page 165 and 166:
1990] BOOKS RECEIVED HONG KONG COUN
Page 167 and 168:
ARTICLES FOREIGN CORRUPT PRACTICES
Page 169 and 170:
1990] FOREIGN CORRUPT PRACTICES ACT
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
UNITED STATES v. VERDUGO-URQUIDEZ,
Page 183 and 184:
1990] U.S. v. VERDUGO-URQUIDEZ bein
Page 185 and 186:
1990] conduct had to be excessive.
Page 187 and 188:
1990] U.S. v. VERDUGO-URQUIDEZ supp
Page 189 and 190:
1990] U.S. v. VERDUGO-URQUIDEZ Verd
Page 191 and 192:
1990] US. v. VERDUGO-URQUIDEZ Unite
Page 193 and 194:
1990] U.S. v. VERDUGO-URQUIDEZ vali
Page 195 and 196:
1990] U.S. v. VERDUGO-URQUIDEZ tion
Page 197 and 198:
1990] U.S. v. VERDUGO-URQUIDEZ disr
Page 199 and 200:
1990] U.S. v. VERDUGO-URQUIDEZ IV.
Page 201 and 202:
COMMENT THE UNITED STATES' 1986 EME
Page 203 and 204:
1990] SANCTIONS AGAINST LIBYA Reaga
Page 205 and 206:
1990] SANCTIONS AGAINST LIBYA power
Page 207 and 208:
1990] SANCTIONS AGAINST LIBYA 1. No
Page 209 and 210:
1990] SANCTIONS AGAINST LIBYA ments
Page 211 and 212:
1990] SANCTIONS AGAINST LIBYA d'Aff
Page 213 and 214:
1990] SANCTIONS AGAINST LIBYA sion
Page 215 and 216:
1990] SANCTIONS AGAINST LIBYA 2. Pr
Page 217 and 218:
1990] SANCTIONS AGAINST LIBYA On Ju
Page 219 and 220:
1990] SANCTIONS AGAINST LIBYA (b) E
Page 221 and 222:
19901 SANCTIONS AGAINST LIBYA ulate
Page 223 and 224:
1990] SANCTIONS AGAINST LIBYA permi
Page 225 and 226:
1990] SANCTIONS AGAINST LIBYA illeg
Page 227 and 228:
1990] SANCTIONS AGAINST LIBYA FIGUR
Page 229 and 230:
19901 SANCTIONS AGAINST LIBYA FIGUR
Page 231 and 232:
1990] SANCTIONS AGAINST LIBYA Prohi
Page 233 and 234:
1990] SANCTIONS AGAINST LIBYA larat
Page 235 and 236:
1990] SANCTIONS AGAINST LIBYA incom
Page 237 and 238:
1990] SANCTIONS AGAINST LIBYA a. Ta
Page 239 and 240:
NOTE REEVALUATING THE "CORPORATE VE
Page 241 and 242:
1990] HESTER v. FED. REPUBLIC OF NI
Page 243 and 244:
Page 245 and 246:
Page 247 and 248:
Page 249 and 250:
Page 251 and 252:
Page 253 and 254:
Page 255:
19901 HESTER v. FED. REPUBLIC OF NI
Page 258 and 259:
Page 260 and 261:
Page 262 and 263:
Page 264 and 265:
Page 266 and 267:
Page 268 and 269:
Page 270 and 271:
Page 273 and 274:
BOOKS RECEIVED PRIVATIZATION AND ST
Page 275 and 276:
1990] BOOKS RECEIVED RIGHT v. MIGHT
Page 277 and 278:
1990] BOOKS RECEIVED LAW UNDER STRE
Page 279:
1990] BOOKS RECEIVED 273 factions p
show all

journal - University of Maryland School of Law

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?