WOMEN â 2011 - Indian Social Institute
WOMEN â 2011 - Indian Social Institute
WOMEN â 2011 - Indian Social Institute
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Woman gangraped in moving vehicle in Sikar<br />
JAIPUR: A woman was allegedly gangraped in a moving vehicle in Sikar district on Wednesday night. In<br />
an FIR lodged by the victim at the Patan police station on Thursday, the woman alleged that four persons<br />
abducted her, along with her husband, from their house on Wednesday night and raped her while her<br />
husband was thrown out of the jeep on the way. In the FIR, she has identified the four accused as Bhiron<br />
Singh, Shakti Singh, Rakesh Singh and Chindu. The victim said the accused came called her husband<br />
out of their hut. After that, they forcibly put into a jeep and drove away. On the way, they gagged and<br />
blindfolded her and then threw her husband out. The four then took turns to rape her. They later dumped<br />
the woman at a deserted spot. "They tied the hands of victim's husband and threw him out of a jeep.<br />
Later, the woman was taken to an isolated place and raped in the vehicle," the police said. Police have<br />
arrested two of the four accused. Search is on for the remaining two. (TOI, 14/01/<strong>2011</strong>)<br />
‘Need to treat forcible sex with wife as rape’<br />
The government on Thursday conveyed to the Supreme Court the necessity to treat forcible sexual<br />
intercourse by a man with his wife as rape, saying even the Law Commission has recommended the<br />
“change” in law. Currently, it does not constitute rape if a man has sexual intercourse with his wife who is<br />
aged over 15. “Worldwide in law a man can rape his wife even if she is an adult. But here, it becomes an<br />
offence only if the woman who is his wife is aged below 15 years. This certainly requires amendment and<br />
the Law Commission has also recommended change,” Additional Solicitor General Indira Jaising said<br />
before a bench of Justices Dalveer Bhandari and Deepak Verma. Jaising was referring to the various<br />
anomalies in statutes regarding the “age of childhood” for girls and a lack of clarity on the legal status of<br />
child marriages. The hearing was based on a petition by National Commission for Women highlighting the<br />
various anomalies in different laws which were defeating the very purpose of banning child marriages<br />
under the Child Marriage Restraint Act. “As the law stands today, child marriages are neither void nor<br />
voidable. There should be uniformity in law as regards the age of childhood,” Jaising said. Citing<br />
examples, she said though the Child Marriage Act prevents marriage of girls below 18 years, Section 11<br />
of the Hindu Marriage Act does not declare a marriage void if the girl is below 18. In fact, Section 13 of<br />
the Hindu Marriage Act says that if a marriage is contracted with a girl below 15 and not repudiated by her<br />
till she reaches the age of 18, then the marriage can only be terminated through divorce. The bench<br />
asked the government to address the concerns and shortcomings in law at preventing child marriages.<br />
(IE, 14/01/<strong>2011</strong>)<br />
SC to hear plea for probe on Friday<br />
Jailed after being raped, the Banda victim, who is waging a battle against her alleged rapist BSP MLA<br />
Purushottam Dwivedi and the State police, saw help coming from the most unexpected quarters with<br />
noted lawyer Harish Salve on Monday requesting the Supreme Court to hold a judicial probe into the<br />
incident. An apex bench headed by Chief Justice SH Kapadia will hear Salve’s application on Friday. The<br />
order was made by a Bench comprising the CJI, Justices Aftab Alam and KS Radhakrishnan during<br />
hearing of a PIL filed by Prakash Singh on implementation of police reforms laid down by a historic<br />
decision of the court in 2006. Senior advocate Harish Salve, who made a mention before the Bench with<br />
a two-page application, requested an urgent intervention by the court into the matter, which clearly was<br />
an aberration on the part of police functioning. The Dalit girl was put in prison for charge of theft, which<br />
violated the procedure contained in the rulebook. Moreover, being a minor, the police should proceed<br />
against her under the Juvenile Justice Act by keeping her at a juvenile home. Faced with pressure from<br />
all quarters, the police finally decided to release the victim giving her a clean chit. She spent over a month<br />
in jail while her alleged rapist was allowed to roam free. Salve demanded an inquiry into the incident by<br />
the District Judge, Allahabad and suggested the report to be submitted to the Supreme Court within a<br />
week. Pressing for an urgent intervention, the application prepared by Salve stated, “An investigation into<br />
this incident would give this court valuable insight into where the system has failed and the kind of<br />
directions that would be necessary to ensure that if what is alleged in the news reports is true, such<br />
incidents do not repeat themselves.” The apex court decided to entertain the application since the PIL<br />
pointed out that implementation of police reforms was lacking on many counts. With police reforms aimed<br />
to insulate police from all kinds of political interference and provide them effective working conditions,<br />
secure tenure, the Bench saw the concern expressed about the minor victim being possibly harassed for<br />
daring to point fingers at the accused, a high-profile politician. (Pioneer, 18/01/<strong>2011</strong>)