05.11.2012 Views

Michael J. Thompson Stephen Eric Bronner Wadood Hamad - Logos

Michael J. Thompson Stephen Eric Bronner Wadood Hamad - Logos

Michael J. Thompson Stephen Eric Bronner Wadood Hamad - Logos

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

P<br />

Ali Hossaini<br />

Vision of the Gods:<br />

An Inquiry Into the Meaning of Photography<br />

by<br />

Ali Hossaini<br />

hotography is ubiquitous within global culture, but we hardly understand<br />

its meaning. And we have only a dim comprehension of its origin. Unlike<br />

cinema, which contains the complexities of motion and montage, the<br />

photograph is simple and, for the most part, brutally realistic. Perhaps the<br />

photograph has seemed too obvious to merit prolonged scholarly attention.<br />

Histories of the medium abound, but their authors follow a pattern<br />

exemplified by Alison and Helmut Gernsheim’s distinguished History of<br />

Photography, first published in 1955. By the standard account, the first<br />

inklings of photography appeared when a 5th century scholar noticed a<br />

camera-like phenomenon, and culminated in the 1820s, when Nicephore<br />

Niepce doped a pewter plate with light-sensitive chemicals and exposed it<br />

within a camera obscura. At their most comprehensive, standard histories<br />

include references to the mediaeval scientists who experimented with pinhole<br />

optics and ultimately invented the camera obscura.<br />

Though the standard account is correct in its details, it neglects the broader<br />

context of photography. Photography is an evolutionary phenomenon, not a<br />

fixed process, and it has drastically altered society at each stage of refinement.<br />

Starting with simple devices, the medium has branched into an enormous<br />

family of technologies that includes cinema, television and digital imagery.<br />

Individuals use cameras, but the medium is far more powerful in the hands of<br />

corporations and the state. Optical media entertain and inform, impress and<br />

oppress; they permeate everyday life, yet cultural theory does not approach<br />

this variety from a coherent base of understanding. What ties together<br />

snapshots and surveillance? Theorists perceive the social effects of mass<br />

media, which range from liberation to abject dehumanization, but the origin<br />

of these effects has not been outlined. We need a paradigm that captures the<br />

common thread of photographic technologies, one that matches the<br />

sophistication of contemporary engineering. Current theory of the<br />

photograph depends on the camera, but the physical device is insufficient to<br />

<strong>Logos</strong> 2.3 – Summer 2003

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!