Michael J. Thompson Stephen Eric Bronner Wadood Hamad - Logos
Michael J. Thompson Stephen Eric Bronner Wadood Hamad - Logos
Michael J. Thompson Stephen Eric Bronner Wadood Hamad - Logos
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
P<br />
Ali Hossaini<br />
Vision of the Gods:<br />
An Inquiry Into the Meaning of Photography<br />
by<br />
Ali Hossaini<br />
hotography is ubiquitous within global culture, but we hardly understand<br />
its meaning. And we have only a dim comprehension of its origin. Unlike<br />
cinema, which contains the complexities of motion and montage, the<br />
photograph is simple and, for the most part, brutally realistic. Perhaps the<br />
photograph has seemed too obvious to merit prolonged scholarly attention.<br />
Histories of the medium abound, but their authors follow a pattern<br />
exemplified by Alison and Helmut Gernsheim’s distinguished History of<br />
Photography, first published in 1955. By the standard account, the first<br />
inklings of photography appeared when a 5th century scholar noticed a<br />
camera-like phenomenon, and culminated in the 1820s, when Nicephore<br />
Niepce doped a pewter plate with light-sensitive chemicals and exposed it<br />
within a camera obscura. At their most comprehensive, standard histories<br />
include references to the mediaeval scientists who experimented with pinhole<br />
optics and ultimately invented the camera obscura.<br />
Though the standard account is correct in its details, it neglects the broader<br />
context of photography. Photography is an evolutionary phenomenon, not a<br />
fixed process, and it has drastically altered society at each stage of refinement.<br />
Starting with simple devices, the medium has branched into an enormous<br />
family of technologies that includes cinema, television and digital imagery.<br />
Individuals use cameras, but the medium is far more powerful in the hands of<br />
corporations and the state. Optical media entertain and inform, impress and<br />
oppress; they permeate everyday life, yet cultural theory does not approach<br />
this variety from a coherent base of understanding. What ties together<br />
snapshots and surveillance? Theorists perceive the social effects of mass<br />
media, which range from liberation to abject dehumanization, but the origin<br />
of these effects has not been outlined. We need a paradigm that captures the<br />
common thread of photographic technologies, one that matches the<br />
sophistication of contemporary engineering. Current theory of the<br />
photograph depends on the camera, but the physical device is insufficient to<br />
<strong>Logos</strong> 2.3 – Summer 2003