Van Zyl and van der Westhuisen - tips

More documents

Recommendations

Info

DEEP CUTS? SOCIAL SERVICE DELIVERY UNDER GEAR Albert van Zyl 1 & Carlene van der Westhuizen 2 TIPS Conference July 2003 1 Albert van Zyl is a Research Associate at Stellenbosch University’s Department of Sociology 2 Carlene van der Westhuizen is a Tax Researcher at IDASA’s Budget Information Service
ABSTRACT Under Government’s GEAR policy, high levels of expenditure on social services (i.e. Social Development, Health, Education and Housing), failed to bring about a reduction in poverty and unemployment. The Government, in particular the National Treasury, blamed this outcome on the inefficiency in the delivery of social services. The “Left”, especially COSATU and its civil society partners, however, claimed that Government’s commitment to conservative deficit targets under GEAR resulted in deep cuts in spending on social services. In this paper we examine the claim from the “Left” that social spending was cut under GEAR and that this reduction led to a decrease in the quantity and quality of social services. We first analyse budgeted as well as actual spending on social services during the GEAR period (1996/7 to 2000/01). Figures were adjusted for the effects of inflation and population growth. We also examine social spending’s share of total expenditure and of Gross Domestic Product (GDP). We find that while budgeted and actual social spending and social spending as share of the budget increased, actual per capital social spending and social spending as share of GDP decreased over the period. We also find that social spending as share of GDP declined by less than total expenditure’s share of GDP. The evidence is therefore not conclusive enough to substantiate the claim that social spending was drastically cut under GEAR. Next we examine the trends in social service delivery during the period to form some preliminary impression of whether the quality and quantity of service delivery did decline over the GEAR period. Again, the data does not show clear evidence of a decline in the quality and quantity of services provided over the period. Our analyses do not provide conclusive evidence for either Government’s or COSATU’s claims and this debate continues to influence other debates around issues like the introduction of a basic income grant, a minimum package of education services, the realisation of basic socio-economic rights and the redesign of the equitable share formula which directs funding to the provinces. 2
Page 1: TIPS F O R U M 20032 0 0 3 P A P E
Page 5 and 6: the realisation of the socio-econom
Page 7 and 8: In their responses to various ‘GE
Page 9 and 10: while actual real expenditure on Ed
Page 11 and 12: 27 %, reflecting government’s com
Page 13 and 14: Housing Budgeted and actual real sp
Page 15 and 16: Table 2.11: Senior Certificate Pass
Page 17 and 18: provide for them in the budget 7 .
Page 19 and 20: Woolard, I. 2001. Report written fo

Van Zyl and van der Westhuisen - tips

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?