CHAPTER 25 Weighted Graphs and Applications Objectives ⢠To ...
CHAPTER 25 Weighted Graphs and Applications Objectives ⢠To ...
CHAPTER 25 Weighted Graphs and Applications Objectives ⢠To ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Seattle<br />
1<br />
807<br />
San Francisco<br />
381<br />
2<br />
1267<br />
1015<br />
1331<br />
2097<br />
Denver<br />
3<br />
1663<br />
1003<br />
599<br />
4<br />
Kansas City<br />
533<br />
Chicago<br />
7<br />
864<br />
1260<br />
787<br />
983<br />
8<br />
888<br />
Boston<br />
9<br />
214<br />
New York<br />
Los Angeles<br />
1435<br />
496<br />
5<br />
781<br />
10<br />
Atlanta<br />
810<br />
Dallas<br />
239<br />
6<br />
661<br />
Houston<br />
1187<br />
11<br />
Miami<br />
Figure <strong>25</strong>.9<br />
The edges in the minimum spanning tree for the cities are highlighted.<br />
Check point<br />
<strong>25</strong>.5 Find a minimum spanning tree for the following graph.<br />
<strong>25</strong>.6 Is the minimum spanning tree unique if all edges have different weights?<br />
<strong>25</strong>.7 If you use an adjacency matrix to represent weighted edges, what will be the time complexity for<br />
Prim’s algorithm?<br />
<strong>25</strong>.8 What happens to the getMinimumSpanningTree() function in <strong>Weighted</strong>Graph if the<br />
graph is not connected? Verify your answer by writing a test program that creates an unconnected<br />
graph <strong>and</strong> invokes the getMinimumSpanningTree() function.<br />
<br />
26