Details - Dhemaji

number of the said vehicle and after seeing it he has come to know that the vehicle is
registered in the name of Kamal Ch Chutia. He also said that the driving license of Surjya
Gogoi which he was seeing in Court today was valid. The road permit which has been shown
to him today was valid on the day he submitted the offence report. The insurance documents
shown to him in court covered the insurance of the vehicle on the day he submitted the
offence report. He also stated that he has not produced any Xerox of the notice which he
issued in Court. He denied the suggestion made to him by the defence counsel that he bore
personal grudge against the accused persons.
PW1 in his evidence stated that on 6.9.2011 he was on duty and his
area was from Jonai Tiniali to the ASTC counter. PW2 was the Town in Charge and he saw
the documents of the vehicle. The vehicle was parked and he saw from a distance that PW2
was questioning the driver of the vehicle. He further stated that he did not know for the lack
of which documents was the case given. He was given as a witness because his duty was
detailed in that area.
The defence also examined two witnesses. DW1 who is the driver of
the vehicle stated in his evidence that on 6.9.2011 police asked him to show his driving
license which he accordingly showed and he was not asked to show any other documents. He
also stated that he was wearing shoes when police came near his vehicle, which he had just
parked. There were no passengers in the bus. All the documents were valid when police
checked his vehicle. The owner of the vehicle which he drives is Kamal Chutia who was not
present in Court that day. In his cross examination this DW has stated that he told the name
of the owner of the bus as Hema Chutia.
DW2 Hema Chutia has stated in his evidence that the owner of the
vehicle AS-22/3366 was his son Kamal Chutia and he had all the valid documents of the
vehicle today which he has submitted in photocopies after comparing it with the original. He