26.11.2014 Views

Report - Dr. Stirling McDowell Foundation for Research Into Teaching

Report - Dr. Stirling McDowell Foundation for Research Into Teaching

Report - Dr. Stirling McDowell Foundation for Research Into Teaching

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Getting Started<br />

In the fall of 2005 teachers, guidance counsellors, administrators and parents<br />

referred students <strong>for</strong> the newly created Literacy 10/20 courses that were being<br />

offered at MRCI. The goal of the Literacy classroom was to improve student<br />

comprehension of text through daily explicit instruction and promote life-long<br />

learning. In more colloquial terms, we also hoped to turn non-readers into<br />

readers. Once the students registered and classes began, each individual student<br />

was put through a series of pre- and post-tests to determine the student’s<br />

abilities and identify areas of needed intervention. The diagnostic that was used<br />

was the Gray Oral Reading Test.<br />

The results of the GORT pre-tests were both fascinating and depressing. Of the<br />

students referred, 97% fit the category of “dependent, struggling readers” since they<br />

all read, at the very least, three grade levels below their age in the areas of<br />

fluency, comprehension, accuracy and rate.<br />

The Literacy Classroom<br />

As the teacher of Literacy 10/20, I sat down and tried to decide in what direction<br />

to take my students and, in essence, where to begin. The words of K. E Stanovich<br />

echoed in my mind: “[A]s the developmental process continues, young struggling<br />

readers become older struggling readers, and the achievement gap widens”<br />

(Stanovich, 1986, p.30).<br />

The actual structure of the literacy classroom was guided by the principles and<br />

theories offered by numerous literacy experts. Students were introduced, through<br />

teacher-modelled explicit instruction, to a wide variety of reading comprehension<br />

strategies (Durkin, 1978; Duffy, 2003; Pressley, 1995; Beers, 2003). A strong<br />

emphasis was also placed on vocabulary development (Ehri, 1999; Calhoun,<br />

1999), fluency (Adams, 1990; Stanovich, 1986), and writing (Tankersley, 2005), and<br />

time was allotted each day <strong>for</strong> a wide variety of reading experiences at the<br />

developed level.<br />

After two semesters the students were then post-tested using the Grey Oral<br />

Reading Test to see if any growth had occurred in the areas of fluency,<br />

comprehension and accuracy. To our delight, all of the students saw some<br />

growth, and some of this growth was substantial, especially in the areas of<br />

fluency and comprehension.<br />

2 RESEARCH REPORT: A School-Based Study on the Relationship Between Increased Literacy Levels and School Attachment

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!