27.11.2014 Views

Chalk and Trees - The Chilterns AONB

Chalk and Trees - The Chilterns AONB

Chalk and Trees - The Chilterns AONB

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

HS2 fight goes to court<br />

he campaign to stop the HS2 high speed rail line will reach the High Court in December 2012 when five formal challenges<br />

to the Government's proposals will<br />

Tbe heard by a judge. <strong>The</strong> proposed<br />

HS2 line will cut a permanent scar<br />

across the <strong>Chilterns</strong> <strong>AONB</strong> at its widest<br />

point <strong>and</strong> the years of construction<br />

would cause huge disruption to local life,<br />

the economy <strong>and</strong> wildlife. If the Court<br />

upholds any of the challenges the<br />

Government may be forced to go back<br />

to square one.<br />

Fight against HS2 goes on<br />

<strong>The</strong> five challenges to the Government's<br />

decision to proceed with HS2 will be heard in<br />

the High Court of Justice over a seven day<br />

period starting on December 3rd 2012. <strong>The</strong><br />

grounds for the challenges include:<br />

High Speed 2<br />

inadequate <strong>and</strong> faulty public consultation,<br />

non-compliance with EU environmental<br />

legislation,<br />

selection of wrong route <strong>and</strong><br />

short-comings in the compensation scheme.<br />

<strong>The</strong> judicial reviews will give anti-HS2 groups the opportunity to<br />

paint a clear picture of the many flaws in the Government's case for<br />

the new line <strong>and</strong> the processes it has followed so far. <strong>The</strong> Secretary<br />

of State for Transport will also be required to explain how 400<br />

responses were omitted from the public consultation analysis. <strong>The</strong><br />

challenges are being brought by:<br />

51M group – an alliance of local authorities opposed to HS2<br />

HS2 Action Alliance (two separate challenges)<br />

Heathrow Hub – a pressure group campaigning for a direct link<br />

to Heathrow Airport<br />

Aylesbury Golf Club<br />

If the Court upholds one or all of the challenges the Government<br />

may be required to scrap the current proposals for HS2 <strong>and</strong> start<br />

again.<br />

Local campaign groups <strong>and</strong> community organisations have<br />

been meeting HS2 Ltd at a number of Community Forums along<br />

the proposed route through the <strong>Chilterns</strong> to raise issues about the<br />

design <strong>and</strong> construction of the route <strong>and</strong> its environmental<br />

impacts. Shirley Judges of the Great Missenden Stop HS2 group<br />

summarises the frustrations felt about the ineffectiveness of these<br />

Forums:<br />

“<br />

People's expectations that the Forums would be a genuine<br />

chance to raise matters of concern with HS2 Ltd have not<br />

been met so far. It is obvious that as far as HS2 Ltd is<br />

concerned, the Forums are a box-ticking exercise, not a<br />

serious contribution to the process.<br />

”<br />

Mess, ugliness <strong>and</strong> noise –<br />

the construction of a high speed rail line in China<br />

Value of <strong>AONB</strong> ignored<br />

Incredibly, an assessment by the Department for Transport (DfT) of<br />

the cost of the damage to the l<strong>and</strong>scapes along the HS2 routes<br />

places a value of zero on the <strong>AONB</strong> status of the <strong>Chilterns</strong><br />

countryside. <strong>The</strong> l<strong>and</strong> that will be destroyed by the line in the<br />

<strong>Chilterns</strong> has been given the lowest value category, despite that fact<br />

that it is designated as some of the finest countryside in the UK.<br />

This is a massive devaluation from the previous official assessment<br />

in 2010. Hilary Wharf, of the HS2 Action Alliance, warned the<br />

move:<br />

establishes a precedent that the most precious green space<br />

can be devalued whenever the Government wants to build<br />

“on it badly enough.<br />

”<br />

<strong>The</strong> DfT claims the huge decrease in the value assigned to<br />

environmental damage is partly due to changes to the route to<br />

reduce its impact. However, the Board <strong>and</strong> others have already<br />

shown that these changes will create more, not less, damage to the<br />

<strong>Chilterns</strong>.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re is also strong evidence that HS2 Ltd's assessment of the<br />

impacts on the environment of building the high speed line will be<br />

completely inadequate. Public scrutiny of their plans to survey the<br />

likely impacts of the line on wildlife, habitats <strong>and</strong> l<strong>and</strong>scapes<br />

resulted in thous<strong>and</strong>s of comments pointing out many weaknesses,<br />

but only a small number of changes were made to the final plans.<br />

Surveys of wildlife are being squeezed into very short timescales –<br />

less than a year – <strong>and</strong> there is no detail on the exact methods that<br />

will be used. It seems that HS2 Ltd has not been instructed to carry<br />

12 <strong>Chalk</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Trees</strong> - Winter 2012

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!