27.11.2014 Views

SAMPLE AGREEMENT - Aphasia Institute

SAMPLE AGREEMENT - Aphasia Institute

SAMPLE AGREEMENT - Aphasia Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SCHEDULE E - PERFORMANCE<br />

1.0 DEFINITIONS.<br />

1.1 Terms. In this Schedule E, the following terms have the following meanings:<br />

“Accountability Indicator “means a measure of HSP performance for which a Target is set;<br />

“Explanatory Indicator” means a measure of HSP performance for which no Performance Target is set;<br />

“Performance Corridor “means the acceptable range of results around a Target;<br />

“Performance Standard” means the range of performance that results when a Performance Corridor is applied to a Target;<br />

“Service Volume” means a measure of services for which a Target has been set.<br />

“Target “means the level of performance expected of the HSP in respect of an Accountability Indicator.<br />

1.2 Accountability Indicators<br />

Without limiting the definition of “Accountability Indicator” set out in s. 1.1, Accountability Indicators:<br />

• are associated with a Target and a Performance Corridor or at a minimum, have a benchmark (e.g. current level of<br />

service must be maintained/decreased, etc.);<br />

• may be tied to dedicated funding from the MOHLTC;<br />

• are valid, feasible measures of system performance; and<br />

• allow for comparability across like organizations and/or regions.<br />

Balanced Budget is an example of an Accountability Indictor.<br />

1.3 Explanatory Indicators<br />

Without limiting the definition of “Explanatory Indicator” set out in s. 1.1, Explanatory Indicators:<br />

• are complementary indicators to the Accountability Indicators and will be documented in the technical specifications of<br />

the most appropriate Accountability Indicator(s);<br />

• support planning, negotiation or problem-solving at the provincial, LHIN level or agency level;<br />

• support transparency and enable planning discussions;<br />

• support of improving and sustaining health system quality, effectiveness and efficiency;<br />

• are indicators where data may already be provided through existing reporting systems; and<br />

The <strong>Aphasia</strong> <strong>Institute</strong> Page 33 of 43

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!