Australian Education Union, Victorian Branch
Australian Education Union, Victorian Branch
Australian Education Union, Victorian Branch
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
feature<br />
Ken Boston<br />
Gonski panel member<br />
and former directorgeneral<br />
of NSW schools.<br />
“The increasing performance gap<br />
between the top and bottom 20%<br />
of students in Australia (equivalent<br />
to about five-and-a-half years of<br />
schooling by Year 9) represents<br />
an extraordinary waste of potential<br />
human capital.<br />
The consequences … are<br />
immense. The loss accruing to<br />
the individual in terms of lost<br />
opportunity and lost earnings, the<br />
loss to the community resulting<br />
from the inability to capitalise on<br />
unrealised skills, and the associated<br />
costs to society arising from<br />
the need to support a consequent<br />
socio-economic underclass, are<br />
extraordinarily high.<br />
The growth of that performance<br />
gap is not the result of serendipity,<br />
but of deliberate funding policies in<br />
the 1990s, which sharply increased<br />
the disparity between rich and poor<br />
schools. This situation can and<br />
must be reversed.”<br />
Christopher Pyne<br />
Federal Coalition<br />
education<br />
spokesman.<br />
“We remain firmly<br />
committed to the current<br />
funding arrangements so that<br />
schools can plan with certainty into<br />
the future.”<br />
Barry O’Farrell<br />
NSW Liberal Premier<br />
Gonski’s “formula<br />
benefits public education<br />
and non-government<br />
education and it’s a formula that we<br />
would dismiss at our own peril.”<br />
➠ continued from page 19<br />
of students and the bottom 20%.<br />
<strong>Education</strong> Minister Peter Garrett spoke to<br />
the AEU delegation at an evening forum to<br />
mark National Public <strong>Education</strong> Day.<br />
Acknowledging the union’s frustration at the<br />
Government’s inaction on Gonski, he sought<br />
their continued support in the struggle for<br />
well-resourced public schools. He desired to<br />
introduce legislation to establish a funding<br />
framework by the end of the year.<br />
Work had started on technical aspects of<br />
implementing the proposed funding formula. “It<br />
is not work that grabs the headlines, but it is<br />
being done,” he said. For example, “we don’t<br />
yet have agreed measures beyond NAPLAN to<br />
choose our reference schools and we don’t yet<br />
have a definition of disability that would enable<br />
a loading to be constructed.<br />
“The review panel gave us a range in which<br />
a low SES loading should be paid, but not<br />
the precise increments or amounts in which<br />
it should be paid, or what specific conditions<br />
should be attached to its payment.”<br />
Ken Boston, a Gonski review panel member<br />
and former director-general of NSW schools,<br />
said continuing the existing schools funding<br />
system would have terrible economic and social<br />
consequences. The existing funding model<br />
expires at the end of next year and “we need<br />
the new model in place by 2014”.<br />
“We’re all pretty anxious about that.’’<br />
Coalition education spokesman Christopher<br />
Pyne told the AEU delegation that the Coalition<br />
remained “firmly committed to the current<br />
funding arrangements”. Unlike Mr Garrett, he<br />
did not stay for the post-forum reception.<br />
Delegations told MPs in marginal seats that<br />
state schools desperately needed extra money<br />
to help them bridge the huge gap between topperforming<br />
and bottom-performing students.<br />
State schools teach most children from lowincome<br />
families, single-parent families, rural<br />
and remote areas, those with disabilities and<br />
those from Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander<br />
backgrounds.<br />
What would state schools do with the<br />
extra money that Gonski believes they need?<br />
Their lists are long and include more support<br />
programs in literacy, numeracy, ESL and<br />
student welfare, extension programs, more<br />
professional development for teachers, new<br />
and improved equipment and resources in art,<br />
sport and music, and new buildings.<br />
Delegations revealed the disadvantages<br />
faced by many of their students (disengaged,<br />
separated, absent or drug-addicted parents,<br />
for example) and pointed to the success of<br />
National Partnerships-funded programs as<br />
evidence of the difference increased funding<br />
can make.<br />
Helen Trickey, a maths/science teacher from<br />
Gisborne Secondary College, said the message<br />
she carried from her principal to McEwen MP<br />
Rob Mitchell was the need for consistent, not<br />
piecemeal, funding.<br />
Her teaching had improved greatly with<br />
numeracy coaches paid for with National<br />
Partnerships funding, but this ends soon.<br />
Coaches helped her and others with task<br />
creation and differentiation, questioning<br />
techniques and the use of examples and<br />
analogies to explain not just how but why<br />
different maths activities were important<br />
(extrapolating from patterns has real-life<br />
applications in medical research, for example).<br />
The coaching she has received has made a<br />
“visible differenence to kids’ learning. You can<br />
physically see them ‘get it’. There’s been a lot<br />
more lightbulb moments,” she said.<br />
Ringwood Secondary College principal<br />
Michael Phillips told Mike Symons that drip-drip<br />
state and federal funding made a mockery of<br />
the autonomy that schools were supposedly<br />
being given. A Gonski funding system would<br />
“take the politics out of funding” and allow<br />
schools to plan long term and consistently<br />
deliver learning support programs, he said. ◆<br />
20 aeu news | june 2012