25.12.2014 Views

BREEDING AND GENETICS - American Society of Animal Science

BREEDING AND GENETICS - American Society of Animal Science

BREEDING AND GENETICS - American Society of Animal Science

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

340 Relationship between EPDs for Angus bulls evaluated<br />

in the Angus National Cattle Evaluation and the<br />

Simmental Multi-Breed International Cattle Evaluation<br />

systems. B. E. Cunningham* 1 , S. Schaeffer 2 , and M. Dong 2 ,<br />

1 <strong>American</strong> Simmental Association, Bozeman, MT, 2 Cornell University,<br />

Ithaca, NY.<br />

In the ASA’s Multi-Breed International Cattle Evaluation (MB-ICE)<br />

system, sires are evaluated together regardless <strong>of</strong> genotype. There were<br />

107 Angus bulls in the MB-ICE system that were published in the Fall<br />

1997 Angus Sire Evaluation Report. The average accuracies for the Angus<br />

EPDs were .98, .97, .96, and .93 for Birth Weight (BWT), Weaning<br />

Weight (WWT), Yearling Weight (YWT), and Maternal Milk (MMK).<br />

The average-BIF accuracies for the ASA EPDs were .38, .35, .35, and<br />

.30 for BWT, WWT, YWT, and MMK. The BIF accuracies were converted<br />

to r ti. Individual expected correlations (E(r)) were calculated<br />

as the product <strong>of</strong> the Angus and ASA r tis. Sires were grouped into<br />

three groups based on individual E(r): High (> .75); Medium (.50–.74);<br />

and Low (< .50). Simple and rank correlations were calculated using<br />

the bulls’ ASA and Angus EPDs. The results indicate the ASA sire<br />

rankings should move closer to the Angus sire rankings with additional<br />

progeny and daughter records.<br />

Trait Group n r 1 pm r2 rank<br />

BWT High 47 .60 .60<br />

Medium 52 .40 .42<br />

Low 8 .10 .23<br />

WWT High 41 .71 .71<br />

Medium 55 .39 .35<br />

Low 11 −.13 .00<br />

YWT High 41 .68 .59<br />

Medium 54 .37 .32<br />

Low 11 .00 .24<br />

MMK High 33 .59 .52<br />

Medium 54 .38 .33<br />

Low 20 .30 .44<br />

1 Rank Correlation<br />

2 Product-Moment Correlation<br />

Key Words: Expected Progeny Difference, Beef Cattle, Genetic Evaluation<br />

J. Anim. Sci. Vol. 76, Suppl. 1/J. Dairy Sci. Vol. 81, Suppl. 1/1998 87

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!