BREEDING AND GENETICS - American Society of Animal Science
BREEDING AND GENETICS - American Society of Animal Science
BREEDING AND GENETICS - American Society of Animal Science
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
340 Relationship between EPDs for Angus bulls evaluated<br />
in the Angus National Cattle Evaluation and the<br />
Simmental Multi-Breed International Cattle Evaluation<br />
systems. B. E. Cunningham* 1 , S. Schaeffer 2 , and M. Dong 2 ,<br />
1 <strong>American</strong> Simmental Association, Bozeman, MT, 2 Cornell University,<br />
Ithaca, NY.<br />
In the ASA’s Multi-Breed International Cattle Evaluation (MB-ICE)<br />
system, sires are evaluated together regardless <strong>of</strong> genotype. There were<br />
107 Angus bulls in the MB-ICE system that were published in the Fall<br />
1997 Angus Sire Evaluation Report. The average accuracies for the Angus<br />
EPDs were .98, .97, .96, and .93 for Birth Weight (BWT), Weaning<br />
Weight (WWT), Yearling Weight (YWT), and Maternal Milk (MMK).<br />
The average-BIF accuracies for the ASA EPDs were .38, .35, .35, and<br />
.30 for BWT, WWT, YWT, and MMK. The BIF accuracies were converted<br />
to r ti. Individual expected correlations (E(r)) were calculated<br />
as the product <strong>of</strong> the Angus and ASA r tis. Sires were grouped into<br />
three groups based on individual E(r): High (> .75); Medium (.50–.74);<br />
and Low (< .50). Simple and rank correlations were calculated using<br />
the bulls’ ASA and Angus EPDs. The results indicate the ASA sire<br />
rankings should move closer to the Angus sire rankings with additional<br />
progeny and daughter records.<br />
Trait Group n r 1 pm r2 rank<br />
BWT High 47 .60 .60<br />
Medium 52 .40 .42<br />
Low 8 .10 .23<br />
WWT High 41 .71 .71<br />
Medium 55 .39 .35<br />
Low 11 −.13 .00<br />
YWT High 41 .68 .59<br />
Medium 54 .37 .32<br />
Low 11 .00 .24<br />
MMK High 33 .59 .52<br />
Medium 54 .38 .33<br />
Low 20 .30 .44<br />
1 Rank Correlation<br />
2 Product-Moment Correlation<br />
Key Words: Expected Progeny Difference, Beef Cattle, Genetic Evaluation<br />
J. Anim. Sci. Vol. 76, Suppl. 1/J. Dairy Sci. Vol. 81, Suppl. 1/1998 87