25.12.2014 Views

reducing barriers to support - BC Society of Transition Houses

reducing barriers to support - BC Society of Transition Houses

reducing barriers to support - BC Society of Transition Houses

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

QUESTIONS FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION<br />

Throughout this paper we have posed questions for you <strong>to</strong> consider as we endeavor <strong>to</strong> build<br />

collaborative relationships and reduce <strong>barriers</strong> for women fleeing violence who have varying levels <strong>of</strong><br />

mental wellness and substance use. These questions are listed again below.<br />

1. How do we define problematic mental wellness and substance use Who defines when substance<br />

use or mental wellness is problematic Is it possible <strong>to</strong> see mental wellness and substance use as<br />

survival mechanisms If so, what implications would this have for <strong>Transition</strong>, Second and Third Stage<br />

<strong>Houses</strong> and Safe Homes<br />

2. How can we ensure that the programming in each <strong>of</strong> our sec<strong>to</strong>rs is inclusive and responsive <strong>to</strong> the<br />

various needs <strong>of</strong> the diversity <strong>of</strong> women in <strong>BC</strong> and the Yukon What mechanisms can we put in<br />

place <strong>to</strong> hold ourselves accountable<br />

3. In the context <strong>of</strong> <strong>Transition</strong>, Second and Third Stage Housing and Safe Homes, how do we tease out<br />

which rules are necessary and which can be done without, or, can be applied more flexibly Aside<br />

from changes <strong>to</strong> policy and procedures, how do we foster attitudinal shifts that would create space<br />

for open, non-judgmental discussions about all <strong>of</strong> the impacts <strong>of</strong> violence against women<br />

4. Is it feasible <strong>to</strong> have women with varying levels <strong>of</strong> mental wellness and substance us reside in a<br />

<strong>Transition</strong> House with other women who may be in recovery Is it beneficial or ethical <strong>to</strong> have a<br />

blanket policy requiring women <strong>to</strong> abstain from substance use or <strong>to</strong> comply with taking medications<br />

while in a <strong>Transition</strong> House<br />

5. How can we strengthen relationships between the VAW, Mental Wellness and Substance Use<br />

sec<strong>to</strong>rs What about for regions where Mental Wellness and Substance Use services are not<br />

available How do we sustain relationships and maintain them despite fluctuations in funding and<br />

changes <strong>to</strong> funding bodies<br />

29

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!