25.12.2014 Views

Connecticut Framework for Teacher Evaluation and Support – SEED ...

Connecticut Framework for Teacher Evaluation and Support – SEED ...

Connecticut Framework for Teacher Evaluation and Support – SEED ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Connecticut</strong> <strong>Framework</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Teacher</strong> <strong>Evaluation</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Support</strong> – <strong>SEED</strong> DRAFT September 2012<br />

3a: Communicating<br />

with students<br />

Critical Attributes<br />

Domain 3: Instruction<br />

Below St<strong>and</strong>ard Developing Proficient Exemplary<br />

<strong>Teacher</strong> attempts to explain the The instructional purpose of the The teacher links the instructional<br />

instructional purpose with limited lesson is clearly communicated to purpose of the lesson to student<br />

success, <strong>and</strong>/or directions <strong>and</strong> students, including where it is interests; the directions <strong>and</strong><br />

procedures must be clarified after situated within broader learning; procedures are clear <strong>and</strong> anticipate<br />

initial student confusion. <strong>Teacher</strong>’s directions <strong>and</strong> procedures are possible student misunderst<strong>and</strong>ing.<br />

explanation of the content may explained clearly. <strong>Teacher</strong>’s <strong>Teacher</strong>’s explanation of content is<br />

contain minor errors; some portions explanation of content is well thorough <strong>and</strong> clear, developing<br />

are clear; other portions are difficult scaffolded, clear <strong>and</strong> accurate, <strong>and</strong> conceptual underst<strong>and</strong>ing through<br />

to follow. <strong>Teacher</strong>’s explanation connects with students’ knowledge artful scaffolding <strong>and</strong> connecting<br />

consists of a monologue, with no <strong>and</strong> experience. During the<br />

with students’ interests. Students<br />

invitation to the students <strong>for</strong> explanation of content, the teacher contribute to extending the content,<br />

intellectual engagement. <strong>Teacher</strong>’s invites student intellectual<br />

<strong>and</strong> in explaining concepts to their<br />

spoken language is correct; however, engagement. <strong>Teacher</strong>’s spoken <strong>and</strong> classmates. <strong>Teacher</strong>’s spoken <strong>and</strong><br />

vocabulary is limited, or not fully written language is clear <strong>and</strong> correct. written language is expressive, <strong>and</strong><br />

appropriate to the students’ ages or Vocabulary is appropriate to the the teacher finds opportunities to<br />

backgrounds.<br />

students’ ages <strong>and</strong> interests. extend students’ vocabularies.<br />

The instructional purpose of the<br />

lesson is unclear to students <strong>and</strong> the<br />

directions <strong>and</strong> procedures are<br />

confusing. <strong>Teacher</strong>’s explanation of<br />

the content contains major errors.<br />

The teacher’s spoken or written<br />

language contains errors of<br />

grammar or syntax. The teacher’s<br />

vocabulary is inappropriate, vague,<br />

or used incorrectly, leaving students<br />

confused.<br />

At no time during the lesson does<br />

the teacher convey to the students<br />

what they will be learning.<br />

Students indicate through their<br />

questions that they are confused<br />

as to the learning task.<br />

The teacher makes a serious<br />

content error that will affect<br />

students’ underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the<br />

lesson.<br />

Students indicate through body<br />

language or questions that they<br />

don’t underst<strong>and</strong> the content<br />

being presented.<br />

<strong>Teacher</strong>’s communications<br />

include errors of vocabulary or<br />

usage.<br />

Vocabulary is inappropriate to<br />

the age or culture of the students.<br />

The teacher refers in passing to<br />

what the students will be learning,<br />

or it is written on the board with<br />

no elaboration or explanation.<br />

<strong>Teacher</strong> must clarify the learning<br />

task so students can complete it.<br />

The teacher makes no serious<br />

content errors, although may make<br />

a minor error.<br />

The teacher’s explanation of the<br />

content consists of a monologue or<br />

is purely procedural with minimal<br />

participation by students.<br />

Vocabulary <strong>and</strong> usage are correct<br />

but unimaginative.<br />

Vocabulary is too advanced or<br />

juvenile <strong>for</strong> the students.<br />

The teacher states clearly, at some<br />

point during the lesson, what the<br />

students will be learning.<br />

If appropriate, the teacher models<br />

the process to be followed in the<br />

task.<br />

Students engage with the learning<br />

task, indicating that they<br />

underst<strong>and</strong> what they are to do.<br />

The teacher makes no content<br />

errors.<br />

<strong>Teacher</strong>’s explanation of content is<br />

clear, <strong>and</strong> invites student<br />

participation <strong>and</strong> thinking.<br />

Vocabulary <strong>and</strong> usage are correct<br />

<strong>and</strong> completely suited to the<br />

lesson.<br />

Vocabulary is appropriate to the<br />

students’ ages <strong>and</strong> levels of<br />

development.<br />

In addition to the characteristics of<br />

“proficient,”<br />

The teacher points out possible<br />

areas <strong>for</strong> misunderst<strong>and</strong>ing.<br />

<strong>Teacher</strong> explains content clearly<br />

<strong>and</strong> imaginatively, using<br />

metaphors <strong>and</strong> analogies to bring<br />

content to life.<br />

All students seem to underst<strong>and</strong><br />

the presentation.<br />

The teacher invites students to<br />

explain the content to the class, or<br />

to classmates.<br />

<strong>Teacher</strong> uses rich language,<br />

offering brief vocabulary lessons<br />

where appropriate.<br />

Adapted from the Danielson <strong>Framework</strong> <strong>for</strong> Teaching 2007 <strong>and</strong> the <strong>Connecticut</strong> Common Core of Teaching 2010

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!