united states bankruptcy court for the eastern district - Pnreorg.com
united states bankruptcy court for the eastern district - Pnreorg.com
united states bankruptcy court for the eastern district - Pnreorg.com
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Case 09-11204-jkf Doc 239 Filed 03/23/09 Entered 03/23/09 15:18:32 Desc Main<br />
Document Page 11 of 19<br />
21. Defendant James W. Robinson, Jr. is an individual residing at 411 Main Street,<br />
Red Hill, PA 18076 and is <strong>the</strong> plaintiff in litigation captioned James W. Robinson, Jr. v. John<br />
Costello, Philadelphia Newspapers LLC and Philadelphia Media Holdings LLC, Civil Action<br />
No. 04231, September Term 2008 (Phila. Ct. Com. Pl.) that was filed against John Costello,<br />
Philadelphia Newspapers LLC and Philadelphia Media Holdings LLC prior to <strong>the</strong> Petition Date.<br />
22. Defendant Harriet Hueitt is an individual residing at 288 W. Monroe Avenue,<br />
New Castle, DE 19720 and is <strong>the</strong> plaintiff in litigation captioned Harriet Hueitt v. Philadelphia<br />
Media Holdings LLC, a/k/a Philadelphia Dailey News; and Jeff Alexander, Civil Action No.<br />
03553, May Term 2008 (Phila. Ct. Com. Pl.) that was filed against Philadelphia Media Holdings<br />
LLC, a/k/a Philadelphia Daily News prior to <strong>the</strong> Petition Date.<br />
23. It is clear that <strong>the</strong> defendants herein (toge<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> “Defendants”) are stayed by<br />
section 362(a) of <strong>the</strong> Bankruptcy code from attempting to collect pre-petition debts from <strong>the</strong><br />
Debtors in <strong>the</strong> above referenced actions (<strong>the</strong> “Pre-Petition Litigation”). The Defendants likewise<br />
should be enjoined under <strong>the</strong> Bankruptcy Code and <strong>the</strong> Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, from<br />
attempting to collect from a Non-Debtor, because such ef<strong>for</strong>ts (i) will have <strong>the</strong> effect of action<br />
against <strong>the</strong> Debtors <strong>the</strong>mselves, and (ii) will cause significant interference with, and impairment<br />
of, <strong>the</strong> Debtors’ ef<strong>for</strong>ts to reorganize.<br />
24. By motion filed on March 23, 2009 (<strong>the</strong> “Preliminary Injunction Motion”), <strong>the</strong><br />
Debtors seek entry of an order preliminarily enjoining all such ef<strong>for</strong>ts.<br />
25. The relief sought by <strong>the</strong> Debtors is critical to <strong>the</strong> Debtors’ ability to preserve <strong>the</strong><br />
assets and value of <strong>the</strong> Debtors’ enterprise <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> benefit of present and future creditors and to<br />
eventually implement a plan of reorganization.<br />
11<br />
796017_3