26.12.2014 Views

united states bankruptcy court for the eastern district - Pnreorg.com

united states bankruptcy court for the eastern district - Pnreorg.com

united states bankruptcy court for the eastern district - Pnreorg.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Case 09-11204-jkf Doc 239 Filed 03/23/09 Entered 03/23/09 15:18:32 Desc Main<br />

Document Page 11 of 19<br />

21. Defendant James W. Robinson, Jr. is an individual residing at 411 Main Street,<br />

Red Hill, PA 18076 and is <strong>the</strong> plaintiff in litigation captioned James W. Robinson, Jr. v. John<br />

Costello, Philadelphia Newspapers LLC and Philadelphia Media Holdings LLC, Civil Action<br />

No. 04231, September Term 2008 (Phila. Ct. Com. Pl.) that was filed against John Costello,<br />

Philadelphia Newspapers LLC and Philadelphia Media Holdings LLC prior to <strong>the</strong> Petition Date.<br />

22. Defendant Harriet Hueitt is an individual residing at 288 W. Monroe Avenue,<br />

New Castle, DE 19720 and is <strong>the</strong> plaintiff in litigation captioned Harriet Hueitt v. Philadelphia<br />

Media Holdings LLC, a/k/a Philadelphia Dailey News; and Jeff Alexander, Civil Action No.<br />

03553, May Term 2008 (Phila. Ct. Com. Pl.) that was filed against Philadelphia Media Holdings<br />

LLC, a/k/a Philadelphia Daily News prior to <strong>the</strong> Petition Date.<br />

23. It is clear that <strong>the</strong> defendants herein (toge<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> “Defendants”) are stayed by<br />

section 362(a) of <strong>the</strong> Bankruptcy code from attempting to collect pre-petition debts from <strong>the</strong><br />

Debtors in <strong>the</strong> above referenced actions (<strong>the</strong> “Pre-Petition Litigation”). The Defendants likewise<br />

should be enjoined under <strong>the</strong> Bankruptcy Code and <strong>the</strong> Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, from<br />

attempting to collect from a Non-Debtor, because such ef<strong>for</strong>ts (i) will have <strong>the</strong> effect of action<br />

against <strong>the</strong> Debtors <strong>the</strong>mselves, and (ii) will cause significant interference with, and impairment<br />

of, <strong>the</strong> Debtors’ ef<strong>for</strong>ts to reorganize.<br />

24. By motion filed on March 23, 2009 (<strong>the</strong> “Preliminary Injunction Motion”), <strong>the</strong><br />

Debtors seek entry of an order preliminarily enjoining all such ef<strong>for</strong>ts.<br />

25. The relief sought by <strong>the</strong> Debtors is critical to <strong>the</strong> Debtors’ ability to preserve <strong>the</strong><br />

assets and value of <strong>the</strong> Debtors’ enterprise <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> benefit of present and future creditors and to<br />

eventually implement a plan of reorganization.<br />

11<br />

796017_3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!