27.12.2014 Views

CHAPTER 33 - Columbia Law School

CHAPTER 33 - Columbia Law School

CHAPTER 33 - Columbia Law School

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Ch. <strong>33</strong> TEMPORARY RELEASE PROGRAMS 907<br />

challenge the legislature or executive’s decision to make you ineligible for temporary release based<br />

upon the crime for which you were convicted, if you have not yet participated in the program. 84<br />

However, it is possible to win, as seen in Lopez v. Coughlin. 85 In that case, an HIV-positive<br />

prisoner applied for work release. The TRC approved the application because the facility doctor,<br />

who was familiar with the prisoner’s condition, said his medical condition would not affect his<br />

ability to be in work release. Central Office reversed and denied the application solely on the basis of<br />

the prisoner’s condition. The Albany County Supreme Court held that this was completely irrational<br />

since the doctor had already given his approval. The court said that Central Office’s findings “were<br />

based on generalizations and possibly inaccurate assumptions” and ordered the TRC to reevaluate<br />

its decision. 86 In Flaherty v. Coughlin, the prisoner alleged that he had been denied temporary release<br />

privileges in retaliation for filing a class action suit. 87 His class action challenged a statewide prison<br />

lockdown, and shortly after filing the suit, Flaherty applied for temporary release privileges. The<br />

TRC accepted him, but the Commissioner of Corrections, whose approval was legally required in<br />

1983 (the time of the suit), reversed the TRC recommendation. Flaherty alleged retaliation and<br />

asked for TRC and Commissioner office documents. The district court dismissed his request, but the<br />

Second Circuit said that because factual evidence existed that retaliation may have been a factor, the<br />

documents Flaherty needed should be given to him so that he could prepare his case. 88<br />

2. Revocation of Temporary Release<br />

(a) How Your Temporary Release Can Be Revoked<br />

Your temporary release may be suspended or revoked by the superintendent or director of your<br />

correctional institution upon recommendation of the TRC or the Commissioner of the Department<br />

of Correctional Services. 89 This suspension or revocation can be made at any time if the<br />

superintendent or director has information that:<br />

(1) Your continued participation in the program is not in the interest of community safety<br />

and goes against your best interests; or<br />

(2) There is a substantial likelihood that you cannot successfully complete the temporary<br />

release program. 90<br />

Some factors which will be considered indicators that you are unsuited for temporary release<br />

include:<br />

(1) Arrest and/or convictions for crimes committed while participating in the program;<br />

84. Lee v. Governor of New York, 87 F.3d 55, 59–60 (2d Cir. 1996) (finding neither an interest in participation in the<br />

temporary release programs for prisoners excluded based on their crime, nor an equal protection or a retroactive<br />

punishment violation); see also Moore v. N.Y.S. Dep’t of Corr. Servs., 26 F.App’x. 32, <strong>33</strong>, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 23192, at<br />

*2 (2d Cir. 2001) (unpublished) (holding that the nature of a prisoner’s crime and his failure to accept full responsibility for it<br />

were rational bases for denying petitioner participation in family reunion program and that such denial was therefore not a<br />

violation of due process).<br />

85. See Dorst v. Pataki, 167 Misc. 2d 329, <strong>33</strong>7, 6<strong>33</strong> N.Y.S.2d 730, 735 (2d Cir. 2001) aff’d, 90 N.Y.2d 696, 699, 687<br />

N.E.2d 1348, 1349, 665 N.Y.S.2d 65, 66 (1997) (holding that executive order flatly eliminating all felons from participation<br />

in temporary release programs was unconstitutional, although upholding power of executive to impose other limits on<br />

temporary release participation); see also Flaherty v. Coughlin, 713 F.2d 10, 14 (2d Cir. 1983); Lopez v. Coughlin, 139<br />

Misc. 2d 851, 529 N.Y.S.2d 247 (Sup. Ct. Albany County 1988).<br />

86. Lopez v. Coughlin, 139 Misc. 2d 851, 854, 529 N.Y.S.2d 247, 249 (Sup. Ct. Albany County 1988).<br />

87. Flaherty v. Coughlin, 713 F.2d 10, 11 (2d Cir. 1983).<br />

88. Flaherty v. Coughlin, 713 F.2d 10, 14 (2d Cir. 1983).<br />

89. N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. Tit. 7, § 1904.1(a) (2001).<br />

90. N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. Tit. 7, § 1904.1(b) (2001).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!