Extremum problems for eigenvalues of discrete Laplace operators
Extremum problems for eigenvalues of discrete Laplace operators
Extremum problems for eigenvalues of discrete Laplace operators
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
10 REN GUO<br />
Then 0 = ∂H<br />
∂θ 1<br />
and 0 = ∂H<br />
∂θ 2<br />
imply that<br />
∑ m<br />
∑ m<br />
(a 3 ...a m + a 2 a 3 ...â i ...a m )(1 + a 2 1) = (a 3 ...a m + a 1 a 3 ...â i ...a m )(1 + a 2 2).<br />
i=3<br />
Since a 1 + a 2 > 0, it is equivalent to<br />
(a 1 − a 2 )(a 1 + a 2 )(a 3 ...a m + a 1a 2 − 1<br />
a 1 + a 2<br />
The third factor is<br />
cot θ 3 ...cot θ m + cot(θ 1 + θ 2 )<br />
m<br />
∑<br />
i=3<br />
i=3<br />
a 3 ...â i ...a m ) = 0.<br />
m∑<br />
cot θ 3 ...ĉot θ i ...cot θ m<br />
which is written as ∑ m<br />
i=1 ã1...̂ã i ...ã m−1 , where ã 1 = cot(θ 1 + θ 2 ),ã i = cot θ i+1 <strong>for</strong><br />
i = 2,...,m−1. This expression corresponds to a cyclic (m−1)-gon. By assumption<br />
<strong>of</strong> the induction, ∑ m<br />
i=1 ã1...̂ã i ...ã m−1 > 0.<br />
Hence the only possibility is a 1 = a 2 . By similar argument, we show that a i = a j<br />
<strong>for</strong> any i,j. Hence the function ∑ m<br />
i=1 a 1...â i ...a m has the unique critical point such<br />
that θ i = π m<br />
<strong>for</strong> any i = 1,...,m.<br />
Next, we claim that ∑ m<br />
i=1 a 1...â i ...a m > 0. Without loss <strong>of</strong> generality, we assume<br />
that a 1 > 0,a 2 > 0,...,a m−1 > 0. Now<br />
m∑<br />
a 1 ...â i ...a m<br />
i=1<br />
i=3<br />
m−2<br />
∑<br />
= a 1 a 2 ...a m−2 (a m−1 + a m ) + a 1 ...â i ...a m−2 (a m−1 a m )<br />
i=1<br />
m−2<br />
∑<br />
m−2<br />
∑<br />
= a 1 a 2 ...a m−2 (a m−1 + a m ) + a 1 ...â i ...a m−2 (a m−1 a m − 1) + a 1 ...â i ...a m−2<br />
i=1<br />
m−2<br />
∑<br />
m−2<br />
a m−1 a m − 1 ∑<br />
= (a m−1 + a m )(a 1 a 2 ...a m−2 + a 1 ...â i ...a m−2 ) + a 1 ...â i ...a m−2 .<br />
a m−1 + a m<br />
Let ã m−1 = am−1am−1<br />
a m−1+a m<br />
i=1<br />
= cot(θ m−1 + θ m ). Then<br />
m−2<br />
∑ a m−1 a m − 1<br />
a 1 a 2 ...a m−2 + a 1 ...â i ...a m−2<br />
a m−1 + a m<br />
i=1<br />
m−2<br />
∑<br />
= a 1 a 2 ...a m−2 + a 1 ...â i ...a m−2 ã m−1 .<br />
i=1<br />
i=1<br />
i=1<br />
Consider an cyclic (m −1)-gon with angles θ 1 ,...,θ m−2 ,θ m−1 +θ m . By the assumption<br />
<strong>of</strong> induction,<br />
There<strong>for</strong>e ∑ m<br />
i=1 a 1...â i ...a m > 0.<br />
m−2<br />
∑<br />
a 1 a 2 ...a m−2 + a 1 ...â i ...a m−2 ã m−1 > 0.<br />
i=1