29.12.2014 Views

The Union of Opposites in the Kabbalah - The new Israeli Jungian ...

The Union of Opposites in the Kabbalah - The new Israeli Jungian ...

The Union of Opposites in the Kabbalah - The new Israeli Jungian ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

68 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Union</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Opposites</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Kabbalah</strong><br />

In <strong>the</strong> poem, <strong>the</strong> two protagonists are equals. <strong>The</strong>ir names, Shulammite and<br />

Shlomoh, derive from <strong>the</strong> Hebrew root sh-l-m that denotes both peace and wholeness.<br />

<strong>The</strong> dual nature <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir names, simultaneously private and transpersonal,<br />

turns <strong>the</strong>m <strong>in</strong>to a qu<strong>in</strong>tessential embodiment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> man-woman relationship. <strong>The</strong><br />

Shulammite enchants Shlomoh, who describes her beauty <strong>in</strong> strik<strong>in</strong>gly rich and<br />

poetic terms through metaphors borrowed from nature that allude to earthl<strong>in</strong>ked,<br />

symbolic, and archetypal aspects. <strong>The</strong> lover is carried away by <strong>the</strong> collective<br />

unconscious <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> realm <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> animus and anima union. Regardless <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

read<strong>in</strong>g one chooses, <strong>the</strong> Song <strong>of</strong> Songs shows that <strong>the</strong> union <strong>of</strong> man and woman<br />

can be an experience <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> paradox <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Self, that is, <strong>the</strong> conjunction <strong>of</strong> opposites.<br />

<strong>The</strong> result <strong>of</strong> this experience is <strong>the</strong> sense <strong>of</strong> Oneness, a feel<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> peace with<br />

oneself and with <strong>the</strong> world.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Partsufim Doctr<strong>in</strong>e: Countenances or Archetypal Images<br />

About four hundred years ago <strong>in</strong> Safed, Isaac Luria <strong>in</strong>troduced a <strong>new</strong> system<br />

to describe processes with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Godhead that <strong>in</strong>volve Partsufim, or, psychologically<br />

speak<strong>in</strong>g, archetypal images <strong>in</strong> human form. Whereas <strong>the</strong> ten Sephiroth,<br />

<strong>the</strong> older system <strong>of</strong> godly emanation, had represented abstract concepts, <strong>the</strong> five<br />

Partsufim are personalized. <strong>The</strong> <strong>in</strong>teraction between <strong>the</strong>m is mythical and thus<br />

closer to psychological understand<strong>in</strong>g. <strong>The</strong> concept appears <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Zohar. Scholem<br />

(1946) notes that anthropomorphic thought w<strong>in</strong>s here its greatest victory <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

history <strong>of</strong> Jewish mysticism and “<strong>the</strong>se symbols reflect highly developed mystical<br />

meditations...almost impenetrable to rational thought...this symbolism is <strong>of</strong> a<br />

somewhat crude texture” (pp. 269–273). For Scholem, <strong>the</strong> symbols <strong>of</strong><br />

“Mo<strong>the</strong>r,””Fa<strong>the</strong>r,” “Son,” and “Daughter” <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Partsufim myth are crude by<br />

comparison to <strong>the</strong> abstract concept <strong>of</strong> div<strong>in</strong>e emanation <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Sephirot.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re are five major Partsufim. Keter (1) is now Arikh Anp<strong>in</strong>, “<strong>the</strong> Long<br />

Suffer<strong>in</strong>g,” represent<strong>in</strong>g pure mercy and div<strong>in</strong>e love. (In <strong>the</strong> Zohar, Arikh Anp<strong>in</strong> is<br />

also called Attika Kadisha, <strong>the</strong> Holy Ancient One.) This is <strong>the</strong> highest sefirah. Arikh<br />

Anp<strong>in</strong> also means slow to anger, namely, patient (from <strong>the</strong> Aramaic root Anaf and<br />

<strong>the</strong> Hebrew root Af, mean<strong>in</strong>g anger). He is also a grandfa<strong>the</strong>r, as is Keter. Hokhmah<br />

(2) and B<strong>in</strong>ah (3) become <strong>the</strong> Partsufim <strong>of</strong> fa<strong>the</strong>r and mo<strong>the</strong>r, Abba and Ima. <strong>The</strong>y<br />

are separated, but jo<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> an eternal union (zivug). Ze`ir Anp<strong>in</strong> (4) comprises <strong>the</strong><br />

six lower Sephiroth and means <strong>the</strong> short face or <strong>the</strong> short nose, <strong>the</strong> impatient, as<br />

opposed to Arikh Anp<strong>in</strong>. He is <strong>the</strong> son. Nukvah (5) (<strong>the</strong> fem<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>e) is Malkhut, <strong>the</strong><br />

tenth sefirah. She is both <strong>the</strong> daughter and <strong>the</strong> son’s consort.<br />

Follow<strong>in</strong>g is a diagram <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Partsufim scheme:<br />

Arikh Anp<strong>in</strong> - Keter (1)<br />

(Grandfa<strong>the</strong>r)<br />

Ima - B<strong>in</strong>ah (3) Abba - Hokhmah (2)<br />

(Mo<strong>the</strong>r)<br />

(Fa<strong>the</strong>r)<br />

Nukvah - Malkhut (5) Ze`ir Anp<strong>in</strong> - Hesed D<strong>in</strong> Tifereth (4)<br />

(Daughter)<br />

(Son) Netsah Hod Yesod

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!