WEDECO MiPRO™ Oxidation Solution Brochure

€ / m³
0,08
Comparison of costs & consumption per m³
0,07
0,06
0,05
0,04
0,03
0,02
0,01
MiPRO eco 3
Ozone: 5 g
H 2
O 2
: 10 g
MiPRO photo
MiPRO eco 3
plus
EEO: 0,26 kW
H 2
O 2
: 10 g
EEO: 0,16 kW
Ozone: 3 g
H 2
O 2
: 5 g
UV (MP) + H 2
O 2
EEO: 0,56 kW
H 2
O 2
: 10 g
The diagram compares costs and consumption
(energy, ozone, H 2
O 2
) per m³.
The treatment goal of this case is the
reduction of pesticides and pharmaceuticals
at a water flow of 2.000 m³/h. The
costs includes capital costs, footprint,
oxygen, energy, H 2
O 2
and maintenance.
In addition to our established expertise, we possess
our own lab and research facilities for water treatment,
which investigate the specific research requirements of
our customers.
Our experts determine the right procedure for your situation
on site at your facility using mobile AOP validation
stations. This does not only apply to new treatment
systems - it can also be used to optimize existing
processes. The various procedures can be tested based
on your specific parameters in just a short period of
time. Practical experience, after all, provides results that
are more tangible and more promising than theoretical
approaches.
“How can a combination of O 3
, H 2
O 2
and UV be less
expensive than H 2
O 2
/ UV”
Different water contaminants are treated best with the most
suitable technology, tailored for the specific contaminant removal.
The MiPRO eco 3
plus solution allows to design each
single step to the optimum. This optimisation results in lower
total treatment cost.
“Why does low pressure UV irradiation work
especially well with AOP”
In many cases, photosensitive substances like NDMA or Amidotrizoic
Acid are directly degraded very efficiently with UV
light (254 nm). By photolysis, the UV light causes the breaking
up of the chemical compounds and thus the degradation of
the pollutants. In addition, the activation of Hydrogen Peroxide
leads to effective oxidation of micro-pollutants.
7