31.12.2014 Views

GMPs for APIs - Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients Committee - Cefic

GMPs for APIs - Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients Committee - Cefic

GMPs for APIs - Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients Committee - Cefic

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

"How to do"-Document Page 36 of 70<br />

9.3 For the API industry, computer printed labels are a norm and pre-printed labels are<br />

exceptions. Most of the ICH statements addressed pre-printed labels. Computer<br />

printed labels are typically printed “on demand” basis and little or no storage is<br />

needed.<br />

9.30 Applicable only <strong>for</strong> pre-printed labels or labels that are printed by on site computer<br />

and stored.<br />

For labels printed “on demand” blank roles of label are not applicable.<br />

9.31 The main focus is on pre-printed labels or labels that are printed by on site computer<br />

and stored.<br />

For labels printed on demand also procedures should be in place to check “number of<br />

labels demanded”, “number of labels printed”, number of labels put on the drums”,<br />

“number of labels attached to the batch record or other traceable documents, e.g.<br />

shipping / dispensing documents” , “number of labels destroyed”.<br />

Additionally a check that the label(s) con<strong>for</strong>m to the master should be documented in<br />

the batch record or other dispensing records. (See also chapter 6.52 <strong>for</strong> reference).<br />

Discrepancies referred to should be treated as critical deviations and thus the results of<br />

the investigation should be approved by the Quality Unit and include measures to be<br />

taken to prevent reoccurrence.<br />

9.32 See comments 9.31, returned labels are not likely to occur if “on demand” printed labels<br />

are used. If too much labels have been demanded, they should be destroyed and<br />

this activity should be documented in the batch record.<br />

9.33 –<br />

9.34 Programmable printing devices used to print labels on demand should not be subject to<br />

validation.<br />

Printing devices may be controlled by a template, which may be changed by designated<br />

personnel according to an established procedure(s).<br />

9.35 The examination of printed labels regarding proper identity and con<strong>for</strong>mity with a<br />

master should be documented in the batch record or other documentation systems in<br />

place, e.g. dispensing records.<br />

(see 9.44, examination and documentation of packaging and labelling).<br />

9.36 See 9.31 <strong>for</strong> reference.<br />

9.4 Packaging and Labelling Operations<br />

9.40 Additionally to primary packaging and labelling after completion of production relabelling<br />

with customer specific in<strong>for</strong>mation as part of manufacture / dispensing /<br />

shipment is common practice. These activities have to be documented in the batch<br />

record or other systems in place, e.g. dispensing records.<br />

9.41 One labelling operation at the same time, only one batch to be labelled (not to be interpretated<br />

as stored) on one pallet or in a defined area (spacially separated). Also barcode<br />

systems correlating batches to labels could be used to prevent mix-ups.<br />

Version 4 September 2002

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!