31.12.2014 Views

(2010): Debris-flow activity along a torrent in - Dendrolab.ch

(2010): Debris-flow activity along a torrent in - Dendrolab.ch

(2010): Debris-flow activity along a torrent in - Dendrolab.ch

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Author's personal copy<br />

A. Sorg et al. / Dendro<strong>ch</strong>ronologia 28 (<strong>2010</strong>) 215–223 219<br />

Table 1. Former debris-<strong>flow</strong> <strong>activity</strong> left 69 visible growth defects and caused 200 growth reactions <strong>in</strong> 28 trees sampled <strong>along</strong> the Geisstriftba<strong>ch</strong><br />

<strong>torrent</strong>.<br />

Event (visible defects) Trees affected % of visible defects<br />

Tilt<strong>in</strong>g 28 41<br />

Stem burial 16 23<br />

Injury 14 20<br />

Exposure of roots 6 9<br />

Elim<strong>in</strong>ation of competitors 3 4<br />

Topped trees 2 3<br />

Total 69 100<br />

Response (growth reactions) Trees affected % of total responses<br />

Tangential rows of traumatic res<strong>in</strong> ducts 74 37<br />

Compression wood 41 20<br />

Growth suppression 42 21<br />

Growth release 25 13<br />

Injury 10 5<br />

Callus tissue 8 4<br />

Total 200 100<br />

<strong>Debris</strong>-<strong>flow</strong> frequency and sectors affected by<br />

events<br />

We reconstructed 13 debris-<strong>flow</strong> events for the period<br />

AD 1913–2006 based on 69 visible growth defects and 200<br />

growth disturbances observed <strong>in</strong> the 28 trees sampled. Table 2<br />

and Fig. 3 clearly illustrate that <strong>in</strong>dividual debris-<strong>flow</strong> events<br />

may <strong>in</strong>duce multiple reactions <strong>in</strong> a s<strong>in</strong>gle tree, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />

5–38 growth reactions identified per debris-<strong>flow</strong> event. At the<br />

same time, it becomes obvious that not all trees were equally<br />

affected by any given event. On average, 31% of the trees<br />

were show<strong>in</strong>g growth reactions after debris-<strong>flow</strong> <strong>activity</strong>.<br />

It also appears from the data that debris <strong>flow</strong>s did not<br />

equally affect the trees selected for analysis, and that differences<br />

exist depend<strong>in</strong>g on the elevation (i.e. lower vs. upper<br />

part of the <strong>ch</strong>annel) and on tree position (i.e. southern vs.<br />

northern <strong>ch</strong>annel levee). Those trees sampled <strong>in</strong> the lowermost<br />

part of the <strong>ch</strong>annel showed repeated signs of debris-<strong>flow</strong><br />

<strong>activity</strong> s<strong>in</strong>ce the beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g of the tree-r<strong>in</strong>g-based reconstruction<br />

<strong>in</strong> 1913. Trees located <strong>in</strong> the upper part of the <strong>ch</strong>annel<br />

were considerably younger and debris <strong>flow</strong>s occurr<strong>in</strong>g before<br />

the mid-twentieth century were therefore not recorded by<br />

these trees. Tak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to account their shorter lifespan, these<br />

trees show more signs of geomorphic <strong>activity</strong> than trees <strong>in</strong><br />

the lower part. Our data <strong>in</strong>dicate that the trees grow<strong>in</strong>g on the<br />

southern levee <strong>in</strong> the lower part of the <strong>ch</strong>annel (1280 m a.s.l.)<br />

were disturbed by 11 out of 13 debris-<strong>flow</strong> events. Other trees<br />

grow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the lower part (1300 m a.s.l.), but on the northern<br />

levee show growth anomalies for five out of six debris <strong>flow</strong>s<br />

after 1970.<br />

Disturbance events caused by <strong>in</strong>dividual debris <strong>flow</strong>s can<br />

be categorized <strong>in</strong>to different spatial patterns, with subsequent<br />

events regularly affect<strong>in</strong>g the same group of trees.<br />

Fig. 4A demonstrates that a debris-<strong>flow</strong> event <strong>in</strong> 1957 left<br />

signs only <strong>in</strong> 6 out of 18 trees grow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the southern levee,<br />

but did not apparently cause growth defects to trees stand<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Fig. 3. (A) Cross-section and (B) growth curves of a heavily affected Larix decidua Mill. Dur<strong>in</strong>g a debris-<strong>flow</strong> event <strong>in</strong> 1957, the tree was<br />

<strong>in</strong>jured and tilted by a debris-<strong>flow</strong> event. As a result, the wound was closed on the upslope side and the tree formed compression wood on the<br />

downslope side of the trunk. The growth reduction <strong>in</strong> 1966 orig<strong>in</strong>ates from a lar<strong>ch</strong> budmoth year.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!