03.01.2015 Views

Exclusive Company: Only and the Dynamics of Vertical Inference ...

Exclusive Company: Only and the Dynamics of Vertical Inference ...

Exclusive Company: Only and the Dynamics of Vertical Inference ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

8 <strong>Only</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Dynamics</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Vertical</strong> <strong>Inference</strong><br />

seems crazy to me ... I just have a very hard time with Horn's <strong>the</strong>ory about <strong>the</strong> truthconditions<br />

oil love only you.<br />

Fur<strong>the</strong>r, Adas denies that only NP subjects are monotone decreasing (or<br />

downward entailing), given <strong>the</strong> lack <strong>of</strong> any valid inference from (14a) to (14b).<br />

(14) a. <strong>Only</strong> Socrates entered <strong>the</strong> race.<br />

b. <strong>Only</strong> Socrates entered <strong>the</strong> race early.<br />

This observation actually dates back seven centuries to Peter <strong>of</strong> Spain, who<br />

notes (in <strong>the</strong> Tractatus Syncategoremata, Mullally 1945: 33) that no entailment<br />

goes through ei<strong>the</strong>r way in (14):<br />

(14') a. y- <strong>Only</strong> Aristotle moves.-*\<br />

b. ^»-<strong>Only</strong> Aristotle runs. -^<br />

But Peter didn't have polarity or inversion to worry about. How does Atlas<br />

account for <strong>the</strong> downward or negative effects associated with only NP The<br />

suspension facts he disputes, along with <strong>the</strong> putative compositionality <strong>of</strong> only if.<br />

The inversion facts he does not acknowledge. And as for polarity licensing,<br />

Atlas maintains on <strong>the</strong> basis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> contrast between (15a) <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> more<br />

marginal or unacceptable (15b-d)<br />

(15) a. <strong>Only</strong> John ever suspected David Alex<strong>and</strong>er.<br />

b. *<strong>Only</strong> Bill wants Sam to finish <strong>the</strong> report until Friday.<br />

c. "<strong>Only</strong> Phil will give Lucy a red cent.<br />

d. <strong>Only</strong> I was all that keen to go to <strong>the</strong> party.<br />

that—contrast to popular opinion, including that <strong>of</strong> virtually everyone who has<br />

considered <strong>the</strong> issue, from Klima 11 to, amazingly, both Ladusaw <strong>and</strong><br />

Linebarger—only NP does not in fact license NPIs:<br />

I do not find <strong>the</strong> syntactic observation that only triggers Negative Polarity Items sufficiently<br />

well-grounded, <strong>and</strong> so I do not believe that <strong>the</strong>re is yet sufficient ground to take only to be a<br />

negative lexical item. (Atlas 1993: 31 3)<br />

Downloaded from http://jos.oxfordjournals.org/ by guest on September 12, 2014<br />

In fact, though, popular opinion is correct, as <strong>the</strong> data in (16) show.<br />

(16) a. (Of all her friends,) <strong>Only</strong> Phil would lift a finger to help Lucy.<br />

b. <strong>Only</strong> your wife gives a hoot about what happens to you.<br />

(McCawley 1981: 83)<br />

c. My nose <strong>and</strong> my lungs are only alive at all because <strong>the</strong>y are part <strong>of</strong> my<br />

body <strong>and</strong> share its common life.<br />

(C. S. Lewis, Mere Christianity, cited injacobsson 1951)<br />

<strong>Only</strong> NP is indeed a polarity licenser, although as a non-overt negator <strong>and</strong> a<br />

non-anti-additive quantifier in <strong>the</strong> sense <strong>of</strong> Zwarts (1986) <strong>and</strong> van der Wouden<br />

(1994), not every polarity item will freely occur within its scope. In this respect,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!