03.01.2015 Views

Manitoba Law Journal Issue 35(1) - Patriot Rebel.pdf - Robson Hall ...

Manitoba Law Journal Issue 35(1) - Patriot Rebel.pdf - Robson Hall ...

Manitoba Law Journal Issue 35(1) - Patriot Rebel.pdf - Robson Hall ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

8 MANITOBA LAW JOURNAL |VOLUME <strong>35</strong> NUMBER 1<br />

of the other trials he presided over, involving other persons associated with the<br />

uprising, he could not be called a highly skilled lawyer or jurist. 29<br />

C.<br />

The Charge<br />

The Canadian government had the choice of three statutes under which it<br />

could lay charges against Riel: the 1838 Fenian Act, 30 the 1868 Canadian High<br />

Treason Felony Statute, 31 and the medieval 1<strong>35</strong>1 Statute of Treasons. 32 The last<br />

made “high treason” the most serious offence in English law, with death being the<br />

only possible outcome upon conviction. The decision to charge Riel under this<br />

1<strong>35</strong>1 legislation was made by the Justice Minister, Sir Alexander Campbell, and<br />

by the Prime Minister, Sir John A. Macdonald. Of the seventy-two participants<br />

charged in the rebellion, only Riel was charged with high treason, 33 the only<br />

charge that carried an automatic death penalty.<br />

Two intertwined reasons have been suggested for the government’s decision.<br />

First, the record suggests that Macdonald wanted Riel executed. 34 Second, the<br />

government was politically motivated to paint the rebellion as the act of one evil<br />

man, rather than what it was: a Métis movement for recognition of their rights to<br />

land, language and religion. <strong>35</strong><br />

The decision to charge Riel with high treason was risky. The essence of high<br />

treason was the act of a citizen against the sovereign. But Riel had become an<br />

American citizen on March 16, 1883. The appropriate charge for Riel, a noncitizen,<br />

would have been under the Fenian Act, which made it treason for a<br />

citizen of another country to levy war against Canada. 36 Either the government<br />

was unaware of Riel’s American citizenship, or they knew and were willing to take<br />

the chance – correctly as it turned out – that this “technicality” would not result<br />

in Riel’s acquittal. 37<br />

29<br />

30<br />

31<br />

32<br />

33<br />

34<br />

<strong>35</strong><br />

36<br />

37<br />

Ibid at 56-62.<br />

In 1838, Upper Canada passed An Act to protect the Inhabitants of this Province against <strong>Law</strong>less<br />

Aggressions from subjects of Foreign Countries, at peace with Her Majesty, 1838, 1 Vict., c 3. This was<br />

subsequently amended by 1840, 3 Vict, c 12. The statute was so heavily relied on to prosecute<br />

the Fenians that it became known as the “Fenian Act”. Under the Fenian Act, it was treason for<br />

a citizen of another country, an alien, to levy war against Canada.<br />

SC 1868, 31 Vict, c 69, formally titled An Act for the better security of the Crown and of the<br />

Government. Under s 5, it was treason-felony to levy war against the Crown or the government.<br />

(UK), 25 ed III, Stat 5, c 2.<br />

Goulet, supra note 25 at 48.<br />

Jean Teillet, “Exoneration for Louis Riel: Mercy, Justice, or Political Expediency” (2004) 67 Sask<br />

L Rev <strong>35</strong>9.<br />

Bumsted, supra note 12 at 271.<br />

Teillet, supra note 34.<br />

Riel was charged with breaches of allegiance (as a British subject) and local allegiances (as a<br />

person living with Canada under the protection of the sovereign). In fact, due to the<br />

Naturalization Act, 1870 of the United Kingdom the doctrine of national allegiance was wiped

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!