04.01.2015 Views

National Bowel Cancer Audit Report 2011 - HQIP

National Bowel Cancer Audit Report 2011 - HQIP

National Bowel Cancer Audit Report 2011 - HQIP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

7. Summary and Discussion<br />

This year’s audit report confirms the progress that has been<br />

observed over recent years. Case ascertainment for England<br />

and Wales, is around 90 per cent and in several Networks the<br />

figure is over 90 per cent; something Wales has achieved for<br />

several time periods. Completeness of data submitted to the<br />

<strong>Audit</strong> is variable and, whilst data that is submitted seems to<br />

be fairly accurate when one compares with HES data, missing<br />

data remains a very real problem.<br />

There has been a good deal of national interest in postoperative<br />

mortality figures and we renew the plea that the<br />

six variables that are used for risk adjusted mortality are<br />

completed in all cases. The use of HES linked audit data<br />

has given added value to the <strong>National</strong> <strong>Bowel</strong> <strong>Cancer</strong> <strong>Audit</strong><br />

and it seems to have revealed several findings, in particular<br />

the increased peri-operative mortality in those cases not<br />

submitted, for whatever reason, to the <strong>Audit</strong>. We can,<br />

nevertheless, be pleased with the year on year reduction<br />

in post-operative mortality.<br />

Several measures that indicate good practice are now<br />

contained within the <strong>Audit</strong> and, where data completeness<br />

is of a high standard, the results at a Trust level are of<br />

considerable value in the peer review process. Almost all our<br />

patients are being discussed at MDT meetings, are being<br />

appropriately imaged with CT scanning and this, together<br />

with the pathological examination of the resected specimen<br />

and discussion at the MDT should lead to an integrated<br />

clinico-pathological stage for almost all cases. We remain<br />

disappointed that figures for the use of MR imaging in rectal<br />

cancer and the use of radiotherapy for such cases<br />

is so incomplete.<br />

There are many other areas where the advances in the<br />

management of colorectal cancer are reflected in the<br />

<strong>Audit</strong>. The year on year increase in the use of laparoscopic<br />

techniques is just one such example. This successful audit<br />

also has the ability to highlight areas where further work is<br />

needed. In studying the post-operative mortality issue there<br />

is clearly a need to resolve, at a national level, areas where<br />

improvements can be made. These may not be surgical but<br />

most surely will be of interest to the multi-professional team.<br />

Similarly, in accepting for the moment the late presentation<br />

with advanced disease, the management of the emergency<br />

admission, with its associated high mortality, also requires<br />

further investigation. These are just two of the many areas<br />

that could be the subject of a more focussed audit and the<br />

changes in the cancer audits, currently under discussion,<br />

together with a resolution to the uncertainty over sustainable<br />

funding, should allow the <strong>Audit</strong> to develop, refine the data<br />

set, and allow for a more flexible platform which can be<br />

altered to suit the audit questions posed.<br />

46 Copyright © <strong>2011</strong>, The NHS Information Centre, <strong>National</strong> <strong>Bowel</strong> <strong>Cancer</strong> <strong>Audit</strong>. All rights reserved.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!