april 15, 2008 - Criminal Law Library Blog

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Lippman, P.J., Tom, Williams, Acosta, JJ. 3394 The People of the State of New York, Ind. 9665/94 Respondent, -against- Luis Grueso Camacho, Defendant-Appellant. _________________________ Steven Banks, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Richard Joselson of counsel), for appellant. Robert M. Morgenthau, District Attorney, New York (Olivia Sohmer of counsel), for respondent. _________________________ Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Bonnie G. Wittner, J.), entered on or about June 2, 2006, which specified and informed defendant that the court would resentence him for his conviction of three counts of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the first degree to an aggregate term of 28 years, unanimously affirmed, and the matter remitted to Supreme Court, New York County, for further proceedings upon defendant's application for resentencing. We perceive no basis for reducing the proposed sentence, which reduces defendant’s original aggregate term from 35 years to life to 28 years. THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT. ENTERED: APRIL 15, 2008 10 _______________________ CLERK
Lippman, P.J., Tom, Williams, Acosta, JJ. 3395 Miguel Reyes, Index 23886/01 Plaintiff-Appellant, Harding Steel, Inc., et al., Defendants-Respondents, Bay Windows Shade Co., Defendant. - - - - - - Harding Steel, Inc., Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant, -against- -against- Lewistown Manufacturing, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent. [And a Fourth Party Action] _________________________ Peter E. Tangredi & Associates, White Plains (Denise O’Connor of counsel), for Miguel Reyes, appellant. Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker LLP, New York (Debra A. Adler of counsel), for Harding Steel, Inc., respondent/appellant. Law Office of Lori D. Fishman, Tarrytown (Michael J. Latini of counsel), for Nate Nate Metal Craft, Barzel Iron Works, Inc. and Metal Craft by N. Barsily, Inc., respondents. Henderson & Brennan, White Plains (John T. Brennan of counsel), for Lewistown Manufacturing, Inc., respondent. _________________________ Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Betty Owen Stinson, J.), entered February 27, 2007, which granted the motions of thirdparty defendant Lewistown Manufacturing, Inc. and defendants Nate Nate Metal Craft, Barzel Iron Works, Inc., and Metal Craft by N. Barsily, Inc. (collectively, Metal Craft) for summary judgment 11
Page 1 and 2: SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION F
Page 3 and 4: Lippman, P.J., Tom, Williams, Acost
Page 5 and 6: Danann Realty Corp. v Harris, 5 NY2
Page 7 and 8: Circle Rubbish launched “a force
Page 9: classes, and scheduling visits with
Page 13 and 14: was cut too deep. Defendants’ the
Page 21 and 22: witnesses and collective tailoring
Page 23 and 24: stipulated to the grounds, and the
Page 29 and 30: Mullaney v Wilbur, 421 US 684 [1975
Page 33 and 34: liability claims “share few, if a
Page 35 and 36: ecords of drug transactions and def
Page 37 and 38: argument that this testimony invade
Page 39 and 40: in the 12 hours prior to plaintiff
Page 41 and 42: individual as the sole tenant in th
Page 43 and 44: opposed the motion, and pending the
Page 45 and 46: that defendant’s vehicle was regi
Page 47 and 48: arrests respectively. In fact, one
Page 49 and 50: inmate-victim who vaguely claimed t
Page 51 and 52: CATTERSON, J. (dissenting) Because
Page 53 and 54: person that’s in the cell closest
Page 55 and 56: evidence that anyone had intimidate
Page 57 and 58: him. See People v. Harte, 29 A.D.3d
Page 59 and 60: summary judgment on his Labor Law
Page 61 and 62:
aise a triable issue as to construc
Page 63 and 64:
specific substance of the conversat
Page 65 and 66:
Gonzalez, J.P., Williams, Catterson
Page 67 and 68:
Mazzarelli, J.P., Andrias, Friedman
Page 69 and 70:
interest of justice. As an alternat
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
leave to amend the complaint to ass
Page 79 and 80:
in the first degree. After being de
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
decline to review it in the interes
Page 85 and 86:
panelist understood that he needed
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
to be compensated for its services
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Lippman, P.J., Saxe, Nardelli, Will
Page 101 and 102:
Lippman, P.J., Tom, Mazzarelli, And
Page 103 and 104:
Tom, J.P., Andrias, Friedman, Gonza
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Gonzalez, J.P., Nardelli, Buckley,
Page 109:
The Following Orders Were Entered A
show all

april 15, 2008 - Criminal Law Library Blog

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?