06.01.2015 Views

2004 - School of Social Service Administration - University of Chicago

2004 - School of Social Service Administration - University of Chicago

2004 - School of Social Service Administration - University of Chicago

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

MICROENTERPRISE PROGRAMS<br />

ACCION <strong>Chicago</strong> associates were interviewed together. One was a current<br />

chief operations <strong>of</strong>ficer and the other was a former employee. Both noted that<br />

by providing training and financial services, ACCION <strong>Chicago</strong> is giving lowincome<br />

individuals the tools (i.e., business skills and financial capital) to compete<br />

in the mainstream economy. This focus on providing both training and<br />

services contradicts ACCION <strong>Chicago</strong>’s mission because according to its mission,<br />

ACCION only provides microcredit activities. Thus, they argue that capital<br />

and training should go hand in hand. That is, if programs are to be most<br />

effective in helping the poor and unemployed overcome the barrier <strong>of</strong> economic<br />

isolation, they should focus on training services while simultaneously<br />

providing access to capital (Jonathan Brereton, chief operating <strong>of</strong>ficer, and<br />

Peter Redovich, associate, ACCION <strong>Chicago</strong>, personal communication,<br />

November 21, 2003). Their views are in agreement and coincide with research<br />

showing that although training activities provided by microenterprise programs<br />

should be combined with credit assistance, lack <strong>of</strong> access to financial capital is<br />

a major barrier to individual economic prosperity. Limitations on access to<br />

credit deserve a closer examination to determine their role in the trainingcredit<br />

relationship (Raheim, 1997).<br />

Often, microenterprise programs like those <strong>of</strong> ACCION <strong>Chicago</strong> have<br />

similarities with microenterprise programs in third-world countries. For<br />

example, Woodworth (2000) finds that to empower the third-world poor,<br />

small businesses are created through village banking. In this process, no<br />

collateral or credit history is required. When a group borrows money, each<br />

member <strong>of</strong> the group is individually liable for the entire amount <strong>of</strong> the loan.<br />

Woodworth noted that social pressure and trust create powerful incentives<br />

(such as group responsibility, accountability, and shame from the community)<br />

for the group to pay back the loan; members do not want to be the sole individual<br />

responsible for repayment. The structure <strong>of</strong> these microenterprise programs<br />

in third-world countries does not necessarily mirror those in the U.S.<br />

If the practices and programs at ACCION <strong>Chicago</strong> are analyzed, differences<br />

become apparent. ACCION <strong>Chicago</strong> requires collateral or a cosigner in order<br />

to prequalify for the loan. The microenterprise lenders in third-world countries<br />

definitely do not require such steps. In the U.S., such requirements create a<br />

creaming effect, such that the system favors those able to find cosigners and<br />

collateral. As a result, the poorest and least skilled are cut <strong>of</strong>f by this strategy.<br />

ACCURACY OF GOAL-STRATEGY MATCH<br />

ACCION <strong>Chicago</strong>’s proposed solution to the problem <strong>of</strong> poverty is to provide<br />

47

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!