06.01.2015 Views

happy father's day 2008 - The Metro Herald

happy father's day 2008 - The Metro Herald

happy father's day 2008 - The Metro Herald

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CAPITAL COMMENTS<br />

June 13, <strong>2008</strong><br />

MCCAIN SAYS GAS PRICES<br />

WON’T DROP<br />

AND COULD RISE<br />

Record high prices for gasoline<br />

probably won’t drop before<br />

the November election, Republican<br />

John McCain said.<br />

“I don’t think it’s going much<br />

lower, and it could go higher,” McCain<br />

said on NBC’s “To<strong>day</strong> Show.” “I don’t<br />

think so, not when you’ve got a finite<br />

supply, basically, and a cartel controlling<br />

it.”<br />

Although the GOP presidential candidate<br />

didn’t address the question of<br />

raising taxes on oil companies, he said<br />

the companies “absolutely” should return<br />

some profits to consumers. “And<br />

they should be embarking on research<br />

and development that will pay off in<br />

reducing our dependence on foreign<br />

oil,” he said.<br />

“<strong>The</strong> point is, oil companies have<br />

got to be more participatory in alternate<br />

energy, in sharing their profits in a<br />

variety of ways, and there is very<br />

strong and justifiable emotion about<br />

their profits,” McCain said.<br />

<strong>The</strong> issue of oil company profits<br />

came up this week in the Senate, where<br />

Republicans stopped the Democrats<br />

from imposing a tax on windfall profits<br />

and taking away billions of dollars<br />

in tax breaks in response to the $4-agallon<br />

price of gas.<br />

In the past McCain has indicated he<br />

would consider such a tax proposal,<br />

saying he didn’t want to see companies<br />

making “obscene profits” that distort<br />

the market.<br />

McCain used the opportunity to<br />

bring up his proposal for a gas tax holi<strong>day</strong><br />

that would suspend the federal tax<br />

of 18.4 cents per gallon, a proposal that<br />

Democratic rival Barack Obama dismisses<br />

as a gimmick. Critics say that<br />

cutting the price<br />

would only increase<br />

demand,<br />

which would<br />

lead to higher<br />

prices again.<br />

“Look what’s<br />

happened to<br />

Americans who<br />

are on a fixed in-<br />

Senator<br />

John McCain<br />

come, particularly<br />

low-income<br />

Americans—that’s why I wanted to<br />

give them a little break,” McCain said.<br />

“<strong>The</strong>y drive the furthest. <strong>The</strong>y drive<br />

the automobiles that use the most gasoline.<br />

I wanted to give them a little<br />

break for the summer.”<br />

In the interview, McCain said President<br />

Bush’s strategy to increase the<br />

number of troops in Iraq last year is<br />

working. McCain has been an ardent<br />

supporter of the Iraq war, but he criticized<br />

the early handling of the war, saying<br />

Bush did not send enough troops<br />

initially. In fact, he challenged the characterization<br />

that the strategy of increasing<br />

troop levels was Bush’s: “May I<br />

correct that statement I advocated the<br />

surge policy before President Bush.”<br />

McCain was asked if, since he argues<br />

the strategy is working, he has a<br />

better estimate for when U.S. troops<br />

could leave Iraq.<br />

“No, but that’s not too important,”<br />

McCain said. “What’s important is casualties<br />

in Iraq.<br />

“Americans are in South Korea.<br />

Americans are in Japan. American troops<br />

are in Germany. That’s all fine. American<br />

casualties, and the ability to withdraw.<br />

We will be able to withdraw.... But the<br />

key to it is we don’t want any more<br />

Americans in harm’s way.”<br />

Obama wants to begin withdrawing<br />

troops from Iraq, which McCain<br />

opposes.<br />

JOHNSON RESIGNS FROM TEAM<br />

VETTING OBAMA VEEP<br />

Jim Johnson, a manager of Democrat<br />

Barack Obama’s vice presidential<br />

search team, resigned amid<br />

criticism over his personal loan deals.<br />

“Jim did not want to distract in any<br />

way from the very important task of<br />

gathering information about my vice<br />

presidential nominee, so he has made a<br />

decision to step aside that I accept,”<br />

Obama said in a statement. “We have a<br />

very good selection process under way,<br />

and I am confident that it will produce<br />

a number of highly qualified candidates<br />

for me to choose from in the weeks<br />

ahead. I remain grateful to Jim for his<br />

service and his efforts in this process.”<br />

Johnson, the former chairman of<br />

mortgage lender Fannie Mae, received<br />

loans with the help of the CEO of<br />

Countrywide Financial Corp., which is<br />

part of a federal investigation in the<br />

midst of the subprime mortgage crisis.<br />

<strong>The</strong> story was first reported by the<br />

Wall Street Journal.<br />

Republican presidential candidate<br />

John McCain had accused Obama of<br />

hypocrisy for speaking out against<br />

Countrywide’s tactics while his vetter<br />

got favorable rates on three home<br />

mortgages totaling $1.7 million.<br />

Johnson served on Obama’s vetting<br />

team with two prominent Democratic<br />

attorneys—former Deputy Attorney<br />

General Eric Holder and Caroline<br />

Kennedy, the daughter of the late President<br />

John F. Kennedy.<br />

Johnson brought the most experience<br />

to the vetting team, having filled<br />

the same role for Democratic nominees<br />

John Kerry in 2004 and Walter Mondale<br />

in 1984. He and Holder had been holding<br />

meetings this week with lawmakers<br />

on Capitol Hill to seek their input on<br />

possible running mate candidates.<br />

<strong>The</strong> campaign declined to answer<br />

questions about whether Johnson<br />

would be replaced or the vetting<br />

process will be left to Holder and<br />

Kennedy, who have not been involved<br />

in a vice presidential search before.<br />

On Tues<strong>day</strong>, Obama said Johnson<br />

had a “discrete task” and was performing<br />

it well. He suggested the Countrywide<br />

connection was not a problem<br />

since Johnson was an unpaid volunteer<br />

and hadn’t been assigned to work in a<br />

future administration.<br />

“I am not vetting my V.P. search<br />

committee for their mortgages,”<br />

Obama said at the time.<br />

Democrats say the nation should<br />

be ashamed of its ban on gays<br />

serving openly in the military.<br />

It discourages qualified people from<br />

joining the ranks at a time when the<br />

armed forces are stretched by two<br />

wars, they say, and is degrading to<br />

those willing to serve their country.<br />

So what have the Democrats done<br />

about it Nothing, really.<br />

Since taking control of Congress in<br />

January 2007, Democrats have not<br />

convened hearings on the matter or<br />

taken up legislation that would let gays<br />

serve openly, although most party<br />

members favor repealing the prohibition.<br />

Instead, Democrats have focused<br />

their efforts on bringing troops home<br />

from Iraq and other issues that have<br />

broad appeal among voters, such as<br />

lowering gas prices.<br />

In a recent interview with <strong>The</strong> Advocate,<br />

a gay newsmagazine, Democrat<br />

Barack Obama stopped short of<br />

promising to lead the way for change,<br />

saying only that he can “reasonably<br />

see” a repeal of the current ban if<br />

elected president.<br />

Indeed, the gays-in-the-military<br />

issue has slid from being a top campaign<br />

pledge of President Clinton’s to<br />

a footnote on the Democratic agenda<br />

even as some of its staunchest opponents<br />

soften their rhetoric and acknowledge<br />

that the nation’s attitudes<br />

are changing.<br />

“Politics is often driven by risk<br />

aversion and fear and that’s big,” said<br />

Nathaniel Frank, a senior research fellow<br />

at <strong>The</strong> Michael D. Palm Center in<br />

Santa Barbara, Calif., who supports<br />

eliminating the ban. “<strong>The</strong>re are people<br />

FEDERAL METRO FUNDING<br />

MEASURE PASSES HOUSE<br />

Under the leadership of Congressman<br />

Steny H. Hoyer (D-<br />

MD), Congressman Tom Davis<br />

(R-VA) and members of the Washington<br />

regional delegation, the U.S.<br />

House of Representatives to<strong>day</strong> approved<br />

a key regional and national<br />

transportation priority to provide $1.5<br />

billion in matching dedicated funding<br />

for the Washington <strong>Metro</strong>politan Area<br />

Transit Authority (WMATA). <strong>The</strong><br />

funding is deemed as essential to maintaining<br />

and improving WMATA infrastructure<br />

and services for area residents,<br />

federal workers and visitors to<br />

the Nation’s Capital.<br />

“<strong>The</strong> Washington Area <strong>Metro</strong> system<br />

is a critical national and regional<br />

asset that serves area residents, employees<br />

of the federal government and<br />

millions of annual visitors to the Nation’s<br />

Capital,” stated Congressman<br />

Hoyer. “<strong>The</strong>re is a clear federal interest<br />

in ensuring that ‘America’s Subway,’<br />

which was created by Congress, is able<br />

to operate safely and efficiently for<br />

years to come.”<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Metro</strong> funding measure was<br />

approved as an amendment offered by<br />

Rep. Hoyer along with Reps. Tom<br />

Davis and Chris Van Hollen to the Amtrak<br />

reauthorization bill. <strong>The</strong> amendment<br />

is very similar to legislation introduced<br />

by Rep. Davis to authorize<br />

$1.5 billion over ten years to help finance<br />

capital and preventive maintenance<br />

projects and require matching<br />

dedicated funds from Maryland, Virginia<br />

and the District of Columbia.<br />

“A world capital deserves a worldclass<br />

transit system, and this will ensure<br />

we have one,” said Congressman<br />

Davis. “It will ensure the federal government<br />

can continue to function in<br />

case of natural or man-made disaster,<br />

and it will ensure the system can meet<br />

increased demands placed on it by the<br />

high cost of energy.”<br />

Securing a joint federal-state commitment<br />

to WMATA has long been<br />

seen as essential to providing overdue<br />

capital improvements and maintenance<br />

for the system’s aging infrastructure.<br />

<strong>Metro</strong> officials recently estimated that<br />

the system needs approximately $489<br />

million in urgent and outstanding infrastructure<br />

repair work. <strong>The</strong> system<br />

has been stressed every further with a<br />

rapidly growing ridership, in part due<br />

to rising energy costs in the region.<br />

According to a recent Washington Post<br />

story, “In April, <strong>Metro</strong>’s ridership increased<br />

4.3 percent over the same period<br />

the year before.”<br />

“<strong>Metro</strong>’s value to the region and the<br />

DEMOCRATS RELUCTANT TO TAKE ON<br />

“DON’T ASK, DON’T TELL”<br />

who don’t want to be out front on this.”<br />

<strong>The</strong> reluctance is in large part a result<br />

of Clinton’s painful experience. As<br />

one of his first acts as president, Clinton<br />

sought to make good on his 1992<br />

campaign pledge to open the military<br />

to gays. His effort to change the law<br />

eventually gave way to the current<br />

“don’t ask, don’t tell” policy—but not<br />

before debate on the issue divided his<br />

party, awakened a fierce social conservative<br />

movement and helped GOP critics<br />

cast Clinton as a social liberal who<br />

was woefully out of touch with the<br />

military.<br />

“Don’t ask, don’t tell” is intended<br />

to keep the military from asking recruits<br />

their sexual orientation. In turn,<br />

service members can’t say they are gay<br />

or bisexual, engage in homosexual activity<br />

or marry a member of the same<br />

sex.<br />

No doubt Obama and congressional<br />

Democrats want to avoid Clinton’s<br />

fate. If elected, Obama’s primary task<br />

would be trying to end the Iraq war<br />

without severing his ties to the military<br />

or appearing to the American public as<br />

weak on national security issues.<br />

“Many (party) members underestimate<br />

where Americans are on this,”<br />

said Marty Meehan, the former Massachusetts<br />

Democratic congressman who<br />

last year introduced a House bill to repeal<br />

the current policy. His attempts to<br />

advance the legislation met quiet resistance<br />

among the more conservative<br />

Democrats on the House Armed Services<br />

Committee who feared the issue<br />

would prove too divisive among their<br />

constituents, particularly those on military<br />

bases.<br />

Rep. Steny Hoyer<br />

(D-MD)<br />

nation is immeasurable,”<br />

stated Rep.<br />

Hoyer. “Not<br />

only is it indispensible<br />

as a<br />

transit system<br />

for residents of<br />

and visitors to<br />

the Nation’s<br />

Capital, it is an<br />

essential component<br />

of the region’s emergency<br />

evacuation plans. Now that this measure<br />

has passed the House, we will work<br />

with our colleagues in the Senate to<br />

overcome the hurdles in that body.”<br />

<strong>The</strong> federal commitment to the<br />

Washington <strong>Metro</strong> system dates back<br />

to 1960, when Congress passed and<br />

President Eisenhower signed into law<br />

legislation to provide for the development<br />

of a regional rail system serving<br />

the Nation’s Capital, funding $6.2 billion<br />

of the approximately $10 billion<br />

needed to construct the original 103-<br />

mile system. Congress has since<br />

passed <strong>Metro</strong> authorization bills in<br />

1965, 1969, 1979, and 1990.<br />

Senate action on the measure is<br />

pending due to the objections of Senator<br />

Tom Coburn (R-OK) who has<br />

blocked consideration.<br />

DC BLACK<br />

REPUBLICAN<br />

COUNCIL<br />

FORUM<br />

MEETING<br />

<strong>The</strong> DCBRC Monthly Informational<br />

Discussion<br />

Forum on Tues<strong>day</strong>,<br />

June 17th will be an interesting<br />

and informational event that you<br />

should mark on your calendar.<br />

<strong>The</strong> guest speaker will be<br />

Shannon Reeves who is the<br />

Republican National Committee’s<br />

head of African American<br />

Outreach. <strong>The</strong> event is an excellent<br />

opportunity to determine<br />

what the RNC is doing<br />

toward African Americans in<br />

the <strong>2008</strong> General Elections and<br />

to provide input on what<br />

African American want in this<br />

campaign season and in the<br />

winning candidate’s White<br />

House Administration.<br />

Make plans to join the<br />

DCBRC at Duke’s City Restaurant<br />

(1208 U Street, NW) on the<br />

17th and to bring: announcements<br />

and inside information to<br />

share with other active Black<br />

Republicans. And, bring a list<br />

of suggestions for Mr. Reeves<br />

and the RNC to take notice of in<br />

regards to impacting and influencing<br />

the Black Vote.<br />

Please RSVP to 202-547-<br />

4125 (Bill Reed) Busxchng<br />

@his.com, 202-583-3524<br />

(Bob Richards) RbRchrds@<br />

cs.com by 06/13/08.<br />

UNITED WE STAND<br />

6 THE METRO HERALD

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!