07.01.2015 Views

Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, Unit Nos. 1 & 2 - Test ... - NRC

Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, Unit Nos. 1 & 2 - Test ... - NRC

Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, Unit Nos. 1 & 2 - Test ... - NRC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1. INTRODUCTION<br />

The aim of this test was to check:<br />

"* That the engine could work for 168 hours with very low load of approximately 85 kWm at 1200<br />

RPM, which represents 3.1 % of the nominal power of 2785 kWm at 1200 RPM or a BMEP of<br />

0.5 bar.<br />

" That at the end of the test it was still possible to increase the power in a relatively short time.<br />

(The m in kWm indicates that the power is mechanical just after flywheel to avoid confusion with<br />

the power just after generator which is electrical and generally written kWe. kWe = kWm *<br />

generator efficiency.)<br />

2. DEVELOPMENT OF TEST<br />

2.1. Incidents<br />

Only one incident occurred.<br />

The engine was stopped by an electrical power cut of the grid after 41 hours of running at very low<br />

load. The engine restarted normally, but a fuel rack was stuck. This fuel rack was quickly freed by<br />

hand, without stopping the engine. It was then decided to lubricate all the fuel racks regularly,<br />

every 8 hours.<br />

The cause of this jamming is probably:<br />

"* Long term storage of the engine<br />

For an engine in-service the recommendation is to lubricate the racks every 6 months. In that case<br />

it should be effective at preventing sticking.<br />

2.2. Evolution of main engine parameters<br />

Nothing abnormal.<br />

Nothing abnormal.<br />

Remarks

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!