09.01.2015 Views

VOL.37 NO.1 APRIL 2007 - British Shell Collectors' Club

VOL.37 NO.1 APRIL 2007 - British Shell Collectors' Club

VOL.37 NO.1 APRIL 2007 - British Shell Collectors' Club

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

PALLIDULA Page 14<br />

ABOUT ERRONEA SUCCINCTA, A SYNONYM OF E. ONYX<br />

by E.L. Heiman*<br />

Cypraea succincta Linnaeus, 1758 was first described in the 10 th edition of “Systema naturae” together with<br />

Cypraea onyx Linnaeus 1758, a well known cowry species with beautiful brightly colored shells. Later another<br />

onyx-like species were described: Cypraea adusta Lamarck, 1810 and Cypraea nymphae Jay, 1850, but the<br />

famous conchological authors of the past – L.A. Reeve, the Sowerbys, J.C. Melvill, J.G. Hidalgo – treated them<br />

and C. succincta as forms (synonyms) of C. onyx.<br />

Dodge (1953:87), who analyzed Linnaeus’ types, wrote: “C. succincta is not a good species, being merely the<br />

young of onyx. The identity of succincta is, moreover, proved by an examination of the type in the Queens’s<br />

collection in Sweden, as the shell described in the “Museum Ulricae” is manifestly the same as that of the<br />

“Systema.” It is an individual of onyx in the so-called Bulla stage, showing the pale brown background, the two<br />

white bands encircling it, the juvenile teeth appearing only at the base of the columellar lip, and the marked<br />

expansion of the aperture at that point. Hanley (1855, p. 189) had already reached this conclusion. The<br />

conchological writers up to Hanley’s day were either ignorant of the identity of succincta or, if they expressed an<br />

opinion, they were not in agreement.”<br />

Sowerby (1870) pictured three variety of Cypraea onyx (Linnaeus, 1758) – C. onyx, C. adusta Lamarck,<br />

C. nymphae Duclos – and wrote: “For some time I have tried to establish a collateral distinction, by which the<br />

pale fawn variety of onyx might be separated from the two normal conditions. The slopes of the back towards<br />

the ends appeared to be more gradual, the ends thicker, and the umbilicus less distinct; but an examination of<br />

intermediate forms in Miss Saul’s collection, subsequently convinced me that the three varieties must remain<br />

united under one specific name. I have described the dark brown shell as the type, because probably the<br />

normal condition.”<br />

1. <strong>Shell</strong>s of C. onyx pictured in a work by Sowerby (1870)<br />

First row: C. onyx (left) and C. succincta (right)<br />

Second row: C. adusta and C. nymphae (in the middle)<br />

C. onyx, distributed from the African coasts in the Indian Ocean to the Philippines, Japan and Melanesia, was<br />

traditionally treated as a valid species with forms ‘adusta’ and ‘nymphae.’ When studying intraspecific variation<br />

in Cypraeidae the Schilders (1938) first described in the Prodrome six subspecies of onyx in the genus Erronea:<br />

E. onyx onyx the nominotypical subspecies from North Malaysia to Japan, N. Australia, S. Java and Singapore.<br />

E. onyx melanesiae Schilder & Schilder, 1937 from New Britain.<br />

E. onyx nymphae (Jay, 1850) from Chagos Archipelago to Mauritius. This taxon is discussed in Report-2).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!