10.01.2015 Views

Why Latency Matters to Mobile Backhaul - O3b Networks

Why Latency Matters to Mobile Backhaul - O3b Networks

Why Latency Matters to Mobile Backhaul - O3b Networks

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Why</strong> <strong>Latency</strong> <strong>Matters</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Mobile</strong> <strong>Backhaul</strong><br />

Interactive user services<br />

The impact of latency on interactive services is more subjective. As the<br />

delay increases, the applications continue <strong>to</strong> function. However, the sense<br />

of immediacy and the usability degrades. At some point, the user becomes<br />

less <strong>to</strong>lerant of waiting for the response, eventually giving up and moving<br />

on <strong>to</strong> something more satisfying. A great deal of research has been done<br />

by companies whose revenues are impacted when users abandon their<br />

transactions.<br />

The importance of latency on web commerce was first showcased by Zona<br />

Research in 1999 with the popular “8-second rule”. Zona found that more<br />

than $4 billion e-commerce sales were lost due <strong>to</strong> poor site performance,<br />

which ultimately led <strong>to</strong> transaction abandonment. In a follow up study in<br />

2006, Jupiter Research concluded that the threshold had been reduced <strong>to</strong> 4<br />

seconds, as more users experience the performance of high-speed<br />

broadband.<br />

Google discovered that the number of web searches and ad revenue<br />

declined as they increased the number of user search results from 10 <strong>to</strong> 30.<br />

Further research found the result was due <strong>to</strong> the additional time required <strong>to</strong><br />

compute and present more results <strong>to</strong> the user. Increasing the results from<br />

10 <strong>to</strong> 30 required an additional 500ms <strong>to</strong> compute and resulted in a 25%<br />

drop in the number of searches done by users. Following this initial study,<br />

Google performed additional tests focused exclusively on the latency. They<br />

injected artificial delay in<strong>to</strong> the display of the search results. An increase in<br />

display time of 400ms actually decreased the number of searches per users<br />

by 0.44% <strong>to</strong> 0.76%. While these drops in usage appear small, they had a<br />

direct and meaningful impact on ad revenue.<br />

Similarly with Amazon: “We tried delaying the page in increments of<br />

100 milliseconds and found that even very small delays would result in<br />

substantial and costly drops in revenue,” said researcher Greg Linden.<br />

Linden provides a precise figure: -1% sales for 100ms or more latency.<br />

(Greg Linden in “Make Data Useful”, Data Mining course Stanford in 2006).<br />

Steve Souders from O’Reilly adds more examples in a blog posting<br />

http://radar.oreilly.com/2009/07/velocity-making-your-site-fast.html.<br />

In “Performance Related Changes and their User Impact,” Eric Schurman<br />

(Bing) explains that Bing researchers have conducted tests adding a static<br />

delay of 50 ms <strong>to</strong> 2 seconds <strong>to</strong> their servers. A negative impact on the Bing<br />

performance indica<strong>to</strong>rs resulted as soon as the delay increased by more<br />

than 50ms. The degradation noticed was linear.<br />

www.o3bnetworks.com 9

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!